• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

CBS/Paramount sues to stop Axanar 2 - Electric Boogaloo-Fanboys gone WILD-too many hyphens

Do you enjoy pie?

  • Yes, sweet, please

    Votes: 79 40.9%
  • Yes, savory, please

    Votes: 42 21.8%
  • Yes, any kind

    Votes: 80 41.5%
  • No, I'm a heathen

    Votes: 37 19.2%

  • Total voters
    193
I don't think there's much stopping him, honestly. Aesthetic designs don't have intellectual property protection in the US*, and it's not an official ship with an official name anyway. There's no legal barrier to selling a model of a spaceship called U.S.S. Ares. You could probably get away with even selling a model of the TOS Enterprise as long as the box said something like "Future Space Exploration Cruiser circa 2266" and not the trademarked phrases "Star Trek" or "Starship Enterprise." That was a fairly common practice in aftermarket Star Trek model kits back in the day, though now that distribution is so much easier, people are a lot less circumspect about not using potentially-protected names or phrases. Getting a dozen resin kits you hand-molded smashed is a lot more trouble than having a 3D-printable model taken offline, especially since you can just reupload the latter with a different name.

Alec in particular might be limited by his legal agreement with Paramount/CBS, but IIRC, the restrictions were fairly narrow, mostly to get him to stop representing merch as official Star Trek product.

*This is why luxury brands can be so garishly over the top about their logos. There's nothing stopping you from selling a handbag that's exactly the same shape as a Louis Vuitton purse, but their distinctive "LV" logo and patterns that are stitched, printed, or embossed into the material are protected under trademark law, so you can't legally duplicate that.
 
This is why luxury brands can be so garishly over the top about their logos.

This is also due to the difference between Copyright Law and Trademark Law. As I understand it, if you have a trademark, you must defend it against all unauthorized use or risk losing it to public domain. A copyright holder may choose selectively to enforce (or not) against third-party use. Example, one author allowed fan fiction but had her lawyers send cease & desist letters for fan fiction that put her teenage characters in X-rated stories. On the other hand Mickey Mouse is trademarked and thus is why Disney sends lawyers after grandmothers who hand-embroider him on a sweater for her grandson and hospitals that paint him on the walls in the children's ward. Yes, it looks bad from a PR point of view, but legally, they are required to do so.

As to the Axanar ship models, I think they should lose in court as it's obviously a derivative of Paramount's Trek look & feel.
 
The one big thing that could block this model's production and sale is the prior lawsuit brought to Axanar, Inc. by CBS/Viacom/Paramount. There's already precedent established for IP theft/infringement in this case, above and beyond "fair use" predicates. Mostly because of revenue generated for the project (and other purposes). It may accelerate the process, because, y'know, I don't think they're giving away the kits for free! :D

That, and C/V/P has a history of sending their lawyers, in general, after producers of garage kits, blueprints and other Trek-related memorabilia not considered "officially sanctioned", when $$$ is involved. This is especially true if said-products flew in the face of released merchandise (or of imminent release). The Stage 9 effort was another example of this - I think due to new (licensed) walkthrough's being added to STO for purchase. I can't remember clearly if that was the catalyst for the S9 shutdown, or if it was something else, but there was definitely an official C&D involved there.
 
I don't think there's much stopping him, honestly. Aesthetic designs don't have intellectual property protection in the US*, and it's not an official ship with an official name anyway. There's no legal barrier to selling a model of a spaceship called U.S.S. Ares. You could probably get away with even selling a model of the TOS Enterprise as long as the box said something like "Future Space Exploration Cruiser circa 2266" and not the trademarked phrases "Star Trek" or "Starship Enterprise." That was a fairly common practice in aftermarket Star Trek model kits back in the day, though now that distribution is so much easier, people are a lot less circumspect about not using potentially-protected names or phrases. Getting a dozen resin kits you hand-molded smashed is a lot more trouble than having a 3D-printable model taken offline, especially since you can just reupload the latter with a different name.

Alec in particular might be limited by his legal agreement with Paramount/CBS, but IIRC, the restrictions were fairly narrow, mostly to get him to stop representing merch as official Star Trek product.

*This is why luxury brands can be so garishly over the top about their logos. There's nothing stopping you from selling a handbag that's exactly the same shape as a Louis Vuitton purse, but their distinctive "LV" logo and patterns that are stitched, printed, or embossed into the material are protected under trademark law, so you can't legally duplicate that.

I dunno. I hear what you're saying, and if it was some Chinese company I've never heard of making this model, I'd bet it would fly underneath CBS/Paramount's radar. But this is Alec Peters we're talking about. I don't think it matters that the Ares is an original design*, it looks Star Trek enough that Paramount would have a case, Plus, as was mentioned above, they already had a lawsuit against Axanar in the past.

*Original, as in it's clearly based on the design influences of Starfleet vessels, which are not Peters' IP.
 
Yeah, nobody looks at that and goes, "Oh, look, Star Wars!"

And unless you knew where it was from, you'd assume it was from some modern Trek show you don't want to watch/never watched, or some video game.


If Alec was such a genius, he wouldn't still be milking this thing what -- about a decade later now??? -- and would have wowed us with some new short film with total original ideas (assuming such a project got film and wasn't in Fundrasing Hell forever).
 
This is also due to the difference between Copyright Law and Trademark Law. As I understand it, if you have a trademark, you must defend it against all unauthorized use or risk losing it to public domain. A copyright holder may choose selectively to enforce (or not) against third-party use. Example, one author allowed fan fiction but had her lawyers send cease & desist letters for fan fiction that put her teenage characters in X-rated stories. On the other hand Mickey Mouse is trademarked and thus is why Disney sends lawyers after grandmothers who hand-embroider him on a sweater for her grandson and hospitals that paint him on the walls in the children's ward. Yes, it looks bad from a PR point of view, but legally, they are required to do so.

As to the Axanar ship models, I think they should lose in court as it's obviously a derivative of Paramount's Trek look & feel.
Kinda sorta. Trademarks must be used, which is to prevent anyone from squatting on them. IIRC while Standard Oil per se no longer exists, at least three current companies have rights to use the brand Standard in various markets, and either sell products or have gas/petrol stations bearing the Standard name in order to keep that trademark. A company need not actively squash every single instance of trademark infringement, but must demonstrate that they've not abandoned it by sitting on the sidelines while someone else uses their mark to the point where they can make a claim on it.

Visual marks are more complicated because even if the trademark lapses, the copyright on the visual representation of the logo and related graphics remain intact.
 
*digs self out from under pile of cobwebs and blinks oddly at the crowd*

Damn. This thread must be immortal...

...seriously? This is still going on?

Has there been a movie? I thought they claimed they finished filming it like a year or two ago?

smh...
 
Also some of the starfleet ship designs in Axanar were just ST09 designs with new nacelles. They even still had the viewscreen windows I think.
And the Klingon ships as well. The Ares is great for the TOS era but it's completely marred by an awful history in this project. It also grinds a bit on the narrative as the CONSTITUTION class was to be the main weapon against the Klingons.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top