Kirk already wrote his entire review for the movie based on the preconceived notions that he pulled out of his ass as soon as he saw the first pictures of the green suit.
Yeah, and I guess I made up Mar-Vell not being in the movie, and her getting brainwashed at of my rear. I also must have been really creative to invent her getting powers through weird blood bullshit. Oh wait, thats all stuff we know happened through trailers, and all stuff that is a giant fuck you to the actual character and source material.
I think the whole thing with Shazam being made to act less like a perfect boy who can do no wrong left him permanently unhinged when it comes to CBMs.
You see, only people who don't know shit about the original Captain Marvel think that there are no comics where Billy wasn't a perfect goodie two shoes pre-New 52.
Read Jerry Ordway's The Power of Shazam. It is THE definitive version of the character, where Billy is a naturally good person, not an angsty shithead, but definitely has flaws and problems and screws up sometimes. A character can have problems and be flawed without the flaws being that they're a shithead while still being heroic. It just takes a good writer. Actually, Grant Morrison did it decently once, so it actually only needs a mediocre or better writer.
You're gonna have to elaborate on this. Quite a bit.
Making Carol Danvers an amnesiac tool of the Kree is the polar opposite of what the character actually is. So, in that way its just as wrong as the examples I used.
Um, yes. You have to watch the whole thing before you can make a proper analysis. That's how it works.
We know what happens to Fake carol, and it doesn't match what happened in the source material, and changes the context so much that it ruins everything (it also takes away all of her own stuff, but I guess we can't let the female hero be the driving force of her story, or let her do things like create her costume, at least with Wonder Woman her armor is an Amazon thing).
I'd put any DCEU movie over Captain Marvel when it comes to looks and CG, and even the one good DCEU film (Wonder Woman) was weak in the CG department, much less the awful snyder films and mediocre Suicide Squad.
Funny how he compares it to Batman becoming a killer to minor changes in the origin to fit the MCU, which is a separate universe from the comics universe and not forced to follow it exactly, yet likes the DCEU which actually made Batman a killer. It’s almost like this is all an act to cause a shitstorm.
You are completely wrong. I HATE all of the Snyder DCEU movies, and the only DCEU movie I think is outright great is Wonder Woman. Suicide Squad is a tolerable mindless action movie if you pretend it isn't a comic adaptation (otherwise its godawful), and Justice League was a meh film kind of saved by Whedon making Superman actually feel like Superman and overall toning down the Snyder bullshit. Aquaman looks good, but its not out yet.
But Man of steel and Batman v Superman? Those movies are offensively awful, for many reasons including turning Batman into The Punisher with a cape. In comparison, I'm a huge MCU fan who didn't believe they had a single bad film until Spider-Man Homecoming came out, and even after Homecoming and Ant-Man & The Wasp I still think they're mostly a hit maker, having 2 (and soon to be 3) bad movies isn't a bad percentage at this point.
It really is a shame that comic book movies are made for general audiences and not the 5 people who think the original origin of a character should be shown, despite not even being canon in the comics any more.
Yeah, god forbid an adaptation actually
adapt something. That would be silly.