• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Can You Believe It's Been Ten Years Since TPM Premiered?

Tulin

Vice Admiral
Admiral
In a couple of weeks we will be at the tenth anniversay since the premiere of the release of TPM.

I find this to be simply amazing!

Since that time we have seen the PT(mercifully)play out and come to an end. We have seen The Matrix trilogy come and go(again, except for the first one, thankfully it is gone!)and we have seen the sleeper POTC trilogy come and go(ditto for the first film there - like TM series, second two should have stayed locked in Davey Jones' locker!).

Who else is shocked that the time has gone so quickly?
 
I try to think about the PT as little as possible... if Spike didn't keep showing them I might have succeeded by now. :rolleyes:

TPM gets bonus points for the podrace, but nothing else in my book.

30 years since ST:TMP is scarier to me lol.
flamingjester4fj.gif
 
I still find the effects work in TPM to be one of the best parts of it(Williams score obviously being the other thing). That is to say, the actual QUALITY of the effects work - not the actual AMOUNT and HOW it was used.

I would give all the battle droids up for something the quality of the Hoth attack from TESB, which still blows me away.


So what are some of your memories from the opening?

I remember seeing it three times on opening day, even though I had only planned for twice. I think that's how such a lower quality film got so much revenue - people were STARVED for new SW and, in those heady months and weeks before the premiere, as far as we knew, THAT was what we were getting - a FOURTH SW film!!!!

It was almost beyond BELIEF.

However, once the opening scroll rolled up and we had info about tax breaks and trade guild negotiations, well.......
 
Even scarier: 13 years since ST:FC. I feel like I watched it yesterday. Well, I did. But you know what I mean. :scream:
 
Yeah, it's been ten years. And what are we doing now? Oh, we're all excited about the new Star Trek movie. Same old. Same old.
 
^ Indeed(re: same old, same old).

I think it's actually a part of getting older that these films don't really excite me anymore, because I have seen them all before, under different names and in different forms.

I must admit, being 38, it is interesting seeing younger people here and elsewhere getting all in a flap over some new Will Smith film or the latest toy commerical cum summer mega blockbuster. I can understand why my uncles and older family members used to look at me in a funny way when, as a kid I was running around saying "SW this..." and "SW that..."!!!!!
 
Yeah I don't know if it's because I'm getting older or what, but this whole decade feels like it's just flown by.

Hell, it feels like only yesterday that the Year 2000 was a really big deal. Now it's already 2009.
 
Shut up you infant.

Yes, that is probably what they were thinking. This would make perfect sense because when I now hear my five year old nephew raving on about Transformers(which to me is just complete shit), I think EXACTLY those words.

Oh and, of course, whatever he likes is crap, compared to what I enjoyed as a kid.
 
I can't believe that next month (May 25th) will be 32 years since ANH was released. I think TPM, AOTC & ROTS were all let downs. I also don't care for the enhanced versions of ANH, TESB & ROTJ that Lucas forced on us. The originals were the best with ANH being a masterpiece of sci-fi movie making.
 
With the Clone Wars series I'm probably more back into Star Wars now than I was ten years ago.
 
My reactions to The Phantom Menace...and keep in mind, I was 14 were:

....well, I was going "the advanced buzz didn't like it? this is okay...wow, Jedis fighting droids!"

...basically, everything until they got down to Naboo and met Jar Jar, I thought "wow, this is Star Wars'

Some people hated that "the opening scrawl contained too much information"....hey, I don't think so; I mean they had to say "the Republic is in decline, its taxing the outlying trade routes as a result, but this is making the corporations like the Trade Federation upset that can afford their own private armies; war is looming"

...the "heavy asian accents" for the Neimodians....I kind of thought were odd when I first heard them. But you know what? I said; hey, the Imperials sounded "British...even though its space and there's no Britain"....so I let that go.

basically, the opening fight scene was just great.

Then....something about Jar Jar was just "nails on chalkboard". Was it the character design? That at least, no. Nothing inherent in the design. But his entire voice and pidgin dialect....it didn't sound "Jamaican" to me or something, as some have said, it just sounded "REALLY ANNOYING" nails on chalkboard. The result was that...I could tell they obviously were trying to market the movie to children to buy merchandise. I was amazed.

But the real problem was just how BAD the script was.

And to top it off, the child actor they got to play Anakin was TERRIBLE. Now I realize there are few good child actors....but this is STAR WARS and you SETTLED For that?!

The parts that weren't cliched were just bad scripting.

it's....the actual basic outline of the story, on paper, wasn't actually bad. "this native character called Jar Jar who'se kind of bungling but helps them" isn't an inherently bad idea; but it's as if they turned everything up to 11

10 years later and I STILL don't know why its called "The Phantom Menace"!

Was Episode Two better? Marginally! but by then....okay TPM's saving grace was that the special effects really were cool to watch, showed what CGI could really start to do; but that "wow factor" was wearing off by the second installment.

Hayden got better as Anakin in episode 3...they actually let him get ANGRY. I maintain that Hayden isn't exactly the worst actor ever, but seriously look at the lines they were feeding him and the direction; it was just awful scripting.

Padme consistently felt like "Leia Redux". The only reason to watch was that Ewan McGreggor was great. Samuel L. Jackson didn't get enough to do.

***really, the only prequel episode I actually feel the need to even...even watch on TV by leaving my TV on in the background when spike runs them, is episode III.

****What the Star Wars prequels did was make us all really upset....seeing as in the next few years of the early 2000's, Star Wars stunk and so did Star Trek. The two biggest franchises went under.

Meanwhile, it set us up for wanting a NEW series that "gets it right", which I really think was "Lord of the Rings", because they actually had a good story (it was after all, a successful book first so it was already tested for quality), good scripting, good direction and acting, good special effects BUT the special effects SERVED THE PLOT instead of taking its place, and respect for the source material.

At least...at least Star Wars was a good reason to go to the movies, franchises are fun.

But we've been in a slump....Pirates 2 and 3 didn't live up to the original, 2007 was the year of the Threequel, thought 2008 was a bit better...well, very good, we had Iron Man then ***DARK KNIGHT*** its been a while since I was CONSUMED by a "movie franchise", like when X-Men exploded onto the scene.

I fell out of love with Battlestar Galactica when season 3 started and I realized "they're making this up as they go along and there is no "Cylon Plan" to the point that they're picking Final Five Cylons based on who would be most shocking, breaking all of their own rules and flat out needing to retcon certain things".........and then I said "maybe its just that BSG is a TV show, and like Farscape season 4 before it, inherently its hard to tell stories on the scale they want because the network will always interfere with their creative freedom...maybe its better to focus on movie franchises again"

****so this summer looks big though: they're starting a new Terminator trilogy set IN the Future War, we've got what's for all intents and purposes X-Men 4 centered on Wolverine....and STAR TREK is back!

You know....all the way up until when I read the advanced reviews, I was saying "it'll be a decent movie but not make us want to "fall in love again"

but the Harry Knowles AICN reviews just LOVED it and said it brought tears to his eyes it was so mind-blowingly amazing and left you hungry for MORE and the return of Star Trek.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top