• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

BREAKING: Paramount Sets Top Secret Star Trek Movie For Summer 2023; To Be Produced By J.J. Abrams

Status
Not open for further replies.
So much variety, what is “Star Trek” other than a name? Maybe that’s all it’s been since DS9, which was pretty different.

Is there still a common ethos vibe to it all, or is that stretching things? Not crabbin, just wondering aloud. Well, in typing, actually
 
Ok. So is there any essence to it? I was really asking, not trying make a point.

It was “humanistic, pluralistic space navy having adventures.” Through TNG.

Maybe it’s just a franchise name, though what I described sounds like DSC.

Maybe it’s a fictional universe with no common ethos across shows.

Eh, let’s drop it, ha ha! That’s not the point of this thread.
 
Ok. So is there any essence to it? I was really asking, not trying make a point.
I don't know...maybe?

For me, when I research TOS's history and Trek's history in general what comes across to me is two things:
1). action/adventure in a science fiction setting to entertain the audience while offering potential social commentary
2). A more optimistic view of humanity's ability to learn from past mistakes.

To me, that invites a lot more variety in storytelling that TOS and occasionally TNG would take advantage of, but few other shows did as much, save for the one offs. They always emphasis a particular piece, rather than taking it as a sand box with a variety of possibilities.
 
I'm interested to see where they take Kirk's character. In '09 he was this brash cocky rebel kid who had daddy issues. Into Darkness taught him the humility of being in the Captain's chair and how you shouldn't be taking it for granted. Beyond showed him to be at a crossroads but at the end he knows where his place is on the bridge of a starship.
 
I'm interested to see where they take Kirk's character. In '09 he was this brash cocky rebel kid who had daddy issues. Into Darkness taught him the humility of being in the Captain's chair and how you shouldn't be taking it for granted. Beyond showed him to be at a crossroads but at the end he knows where his place is on the bridge of a starship.
I think it would be cool to see him step in to the mentor role. Have a newly promoted ensign who is a bit reckless and rough around the edges and is constantly butting heads with Kirk. Kirk is irritated and wants to transfer him and takes Spock and Uhura to remind him of how he used to be.

And they are trying to deal with the Doomsday machine, and have to rescue Commodore Decker and Carol Marcus.
 
I think it would be cool to see him step in to the mentor role. Have a newly promoted ensign who is a bit reckless and rough around the edges and is constantly butting heads with Kirk. Kirk is irritated and wants to transfer him and takes Spock and Uhura to remind him of how he used to be.

And they are trying to deal with the Doomsday machine, and have to rescue Commodore Decker and Carol Marcus.
maybe make the ensign Will Decker. that would be interesting.
 
An Ensign Decker was heard being paged on Discovery's commsystem in Season 1 or 2. I wonder if they intended him to be Will Decker and that he once served aboard Discovery after graduating from the Academy.
 
I would love a Denis Villeneuve Star Trek film, but I don't think it's something he'd ever do.
I'm not so sure. If he was told they wanted to take it away from the current model (which would please me greatly) and do a movie in his ballpark that captures something of the grandeur and the futuristic feel of TMP he might bite.

There's probably zero chance of him wanting to make anything stylistically similar to the last few movies.
 
They almost gave Tarantino a rated-R Star Trek film about gangters on a duplicate Earth and virtually no Enterprise, perhaps they're not entirely against doing crazy things with the franchise.
 
They almost gave Tarantino a rated-R Star Trek film about gangters on a duplicate Earth and virtually no Enterprise, perhaps they're not entirely against doing crazy things with the franchise.

Tarantino is that rare thing. A bankable auteur. If he says he wants to do a Star Trek movie, of course you give him the keys to the castle.
 
With Strange New Worlds, which is sure looking like good ol Star Trek, finally, why even make new movies. Kirk and Mitchell take over SNW after three or four years, probably. Why even make movies? Is this really happening this time?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top