Very... strict.
Very... strict.
And hope usually is baseless, yes.
I will never think that people watching, crowd funding or being in some way involved in a production of a fan film is less of a fan of Star Trek, or taking money out of the franchise, that is utterly insane to me.
So true.
Wait... we're Trek fans. Aren't we supposed to be optimistic and hopeful?
Kor
agreed as fans we are not cash cows for studios to serve up any old rubbish to, and give it both our money and our undying support, the first JJ movie, has some heavy lifting to do resetting the timeline, but it manages to do both that and a good movie, but its not a good Star Trek movie, it is its own thing, hence why some fans are cold on it. CBS is not giving the fanbase proper Star Trek, and this fan films are, this is the beauty of having a prime universe and the movie universe.But this whole "entitlement" argument works both ways, imo. It's true that fans don't have any right to complain about something they don't legally own. At the same time, there's nothing that says a company or franchise is automatically entitled to continued success indefinitely. Everything runs its course and if you want to stave off the inevitable, you need to keep your audience happy.
agreed as fans we are cash cows for studios to serve up any old rubbish to, and give it both our money and our undying support, the first JJ movie, has some heavy lifting to do resetting the timeline, but it manages to do both that and a good movie, but its not a good Star Trek movie, it is its own thing, hence why some fans are cold on it. CBS is not giving the fanbase proper Star Trek, and this fan films are, this is the beauty of having a prime universe and the movie universe.
The studios go out of there way to say these movies are not for the fans, and the cast even those who you would think would be Star Trek fans tell us they are not Star Trek movies (mentioning no names), then the studios wonder why the fans favour the Fan films made in the spirit of prime universe over their rebooted mass market Star Trek themed action movies.
n
I will never think that people watching, crowd funding or being in some way involved in a production of a fan film is less of a fan of Star Trek, or taking money out of the franchise, that is utterly insane to me.
true they are proper Star Trek, of course they are not, but I find them to be more in tone with the prime universe, than the JJ movie verse, and the prime universe is Star Trek for me, as I suspect that is the case for alot of fans.
Fan films are a fun diversion... But I wouldn't say any of them quite qualify as "proper Star Trek."
Kor
I realise I may not be unbiased on this as I might like to think, I would stress I dont think the movies are "utter garbage" but on the same level I did enjoy the "Time Line Restored" video. I also dont think that only the fan films can make good Star Trek, its just at the moment they are currently the only ones who are doing so, I have more hope for the official web series, and like ive said before I think the timing of this, is partly about that.Considering the most popular fan productions are outwardly hostile to JJ Trek I can see how CBS/P would get that idea. I had a feeling fan films were not long for this world when James Cawley blew up the JJ-prise and said "Time Line restored" not terribly long after having a walkon role in the 2009 film. Talk about biting the hand that feeds you. That, to me, started the idea that fan films were the only true torchbarers of Trek. Axanar has been pounding the idea that they were making a Trek movie that's more true than Paramount. David Gerrold has one hissy fit after another that JJ Trek is action garbage and only fans make real work. So it's not that insane a premise to think this is what you're competing with if you're CBS/P. And who want's to compete with someone who is factually stealing their IP? This aggression shall not stand, man.
For Paramount / CBS to take the view that all the people who donated to fan films, are openly hostile to them, and are not Star Trek fans, is insane, and I would personally insulted if someone from either party said that I was less of a fan for supporting those the fan films.
So this makes me wonder, if one were to make multiple 2 15 minute shorts each not exceeding combined 30 minutes where each 30 minutes focuses on one or two characters, would that person be able to then down the line make a 30 minute short where each of the characters that were created happen to be in the same location?
Someone makes shorts:
Bugs and Daffy
Bob and Dora
Thelma and Louise
And after these 3 the person makes a short that
Bugs, Bob, Thelma, Daffy, and Dora are in but not Louise
Would that violate the rules if each short had a self contained story? Or can the person make the first 3 shorts but not the 4th? Or since the person made the first one, they can now never go back into the trek multiverse.
Does anyone else remember when people who purported to be journalists actually *researched* the story they were doing with some thoroughness? No? Just me? And we've always been at war with Eastasia? Okay, gotcha.
*sigh*
because this thread goes back to this quote, where its suggested that fans take money from a franchise, not give it money,Dunno why you're making this about fans. No fans are being sued or directly effected by these rules, only the productions. They over reached and they got slapped down. If I make soda and call it Coca Cola you may not be able to drink it when Coke sues, but I get the punishment.
my direct response being her, I am not of the belief these fan films, and the efforts of fans to support them, take from the main franchise, certainly not when the main franchise has headed in a different direction itself.It seems in the Age of Entitlement, people demonstrate their fandom by outlining how much money they are willing to take OUT of a franchise.
Weird.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.