^ when I saw that video on the news early this morning, I literally jumped off the sofa as if I could do anything - woke the whole house at 6am with my heart in my throatHiding in boxes isn't the way to get yourself positive media attention, this Australian baby shows the proper way to gain it.
FORT COLLINS, Colo. – Authorities are pursuing criminal charges in the case of a boy who vanished into his parents' garage while the world feared he was trapped aboard a helium balloon — prompting speculation of a hoax.
The boy's parents, Richard and Mayumi Heene, met with Larimer County investigators for much of the afternoon, but Sheriff Jim Alderden didn't say who would be charged or what the charges would be.
Alderden didn't call Thursday's hours-long drama a hoax, but he expressed disappointment that he couldn't level more serious charges in the incident, which sent police and the military scrambling to save young Falcon Heene as millions of worried television viewers watched.
"We were looking at Class 3 misdemeanor, which hardly seems serious enough given the circumstances," Alderden said. "We are talking to the district attorney, federal officials to see if perhaps there aren't additional federal charges that are appropriate in this circumstance."
its getting closedr to the ground now
The O.J. trial made all this horseshit possible. I remember the Baby Jessica saga, and yeah, it was headlines, but it didn't stop the rest of the news from being reported. 'Round-the-clock coverage was reserved for real news stories like presidential elections or the first Gulf War.
I can't believe this is what passes for newsworthy these days.
I don't think we had any of those the other day.like presidential elections or the first Gulf War.
Thing is, they got the robot out of the cop van across the other side of the road and it took HOURS for it to trundle across to the offending van.
We would occassionally check back and it was,
"The Robot - Hour 4
but it had only just reached the middle of the road. I LOATHE stupid sensationalist American media.
Thing is, they got the robot out of the cop van across the other side of the road and it took HOURS for it to trundle across to the offending van.
We would occassionally check back and it was,
"The Robot - Hour 4
but it had only just reached the middle of the road. I LOATHE stupid sensationalist American media.
And then some douchebag reporter would talk down to people on the situation
"Now they're extending the arm.......that arm has a hydraulic pump on it so it should be fine"
I agree fully with cultcross. Suspicion is one thing, but there are certain standards of evidence and proof that must be met. Right now I think a lot of people are just pissed that they got excited/scared for nothing, and want to see someone punished for it. This guy is eccentric, and he makes a good target. At this point that's all that the proof amounts to. There were calls for punishment long before this kid ever threw up on TV and a show.Oh, they can be charged with the false police report and then held liable for expenses involved in the recovery of the balloon. You may call it ludicrous, which is fine since that's your opinion. I know someone who works Search and Rescue out in Utah, and his county is among those out West that has started to bill people should a S&R endeavor take place due to negligence, etc. Funds and manpower are scarce.
I wouldn't call it 'ludicrous', that's exactly what should happen. What I think is ludicrous is the overreaction here that seems ready to treat the guy like a murderer because he dared make the American TV audience look gullible.
I know someone who works missing person searches too. Me. And yes, we would bill someone who had deliberately sent us on a wild goose chase, the helicopter alone costs thousands an hour. Not to mention other manpower, shipping in experts, diversion of resources from other activities, abuse of the public awareness system damaging its effectiveness, etc etc. I'm on board with charging the guy every cent it cost, but let's tone down the hyperbole a bit, shall we?
News must travel slow to the UK. There is more and more coming out that you've even missed in this thread. The Balloon Boy vomited during an interview (nerves? Because of what, you may ask); the comment about "being for the show"; how the parents called the news station FIRST, rather than 911; the emergence of a former co-worker stating how the father has always been about garnering attention; the now revelations that the family has financial problems.....It is likely to be a civil matter of demanding payment for the rescue attempts, if it can be shown they staged it.
Again, since you think it's not big deal because, "Well, 'what-if' the boy had been in the balloon...". Whatever.Yeah, let's just chalk it up to a big misunderstanding. That will make everything better.
Where is all this coming from? Because I suggested it might be worth actually showing to the civil standard of proof that they staged it before slapping them with liability for the cots? Horrors, please, shoot my bleeding liberal heart.
I never once said 'it's not a big deal', or 'what if the boy was in the balloon' so you just plain made those up.
I am well aware of the mounting evidence; in fact I believe it was a hoax at this point. But liability comes with certain standards of proof.
It gets worse. There is a rap video.![]()
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a7vfqvgGap0&feature=player_embedded
I agree fully with cultcross. Suspicion is one thing, but there are certain standards of evidence and proof that must be met. Right now I think a lot of people are just pissed that they got excited/scared for nothing, and want to see someone punished for it. This guy is eccentric, and he makes a good target. At this point that's all that the proof amounts to. There were calls for punishment long before this kid ever threw up on TV and a show.Oh, they can be charged with the false police report and then held liable for expenses involved in the recovery of the balloon. You may call it ludicrous, which is fine since that's your opinion. I know someone who works Search and Rescue out in Utah, and his county is among those out West that has started to bill people should a S&R endeavor take place due to negligence, etc. Funds and manpower are scarce.
I wouldn't call it 'ludicrous', that's exactly what should happen. What I think is ludicrous is the overreaction here that seems ready to treat the guy like a murderer because he dared make the American TV audience look gullible.
I know someone who works missing person searches too. Me. And yes, we would bill someone who had deliberately sent us on a wild goose chase, the helicopter alone costs thousands an hour. Not to mention other manpower, shipping in experts, diversion of resources from other activities, abuse of the public awareness system damaging its effectiveness, etc etc. I'm on board with charging the guy every cent it cost, but let's tone down the hyperbole a bit, shall we?
News must travel slow to the UK. There is more and more coming out that you've even missed in this thread. The Balloon Boy vomited during an interview (nerves? Because of what, you may ask); the comment about "being for the show"; how the parents called the news station FIRST, rather than 911; the emergence of a former co-worker stating how the father has always been about garnering attention; the now revelations that the family has financial problems.....
Again, since you think it's not big deal because, "Well, 'what-if' the boy had been in the balloon...". Whatever.Yeah, let's just chalk it up to a big misunderstanding. That will make everything better.
Where is all this coming from? Because I suggested it might be worth actually showing to the civil standard of proof that they staged it before slapping them with liability for the cots? Horrors, please, shoot my bleeding liberal heart.
I never once said 'it's not a big deal', or 'what if the boy was in the balloon' so you just plain made those up.
I am well aware of the mounting evidence; in fact I believe it was a hoax at this point. But liability comes with certain standards of proof.
'Round-the-clock coverage was reserved for real news stories like presidential elections or the first Gulf War.
The parents who set off a worldwide drama by reporting their 6-year-old son was inside a flying saucer-like helium balloon hurtling over Colorado concocted the stunt to market themselves for a television show, a sheriff said Sunday.
Larimer County Sheriff Jim Alderden said no charges had been filed yet, and the parents weren't under arrest. He said he expected to recommend charges of conspiracy, contributing to the delinquency of a minor, making a false report to authorities and attempting to influence a public servant.
Some of the most serious charges each carry a maximum sentence of six years in prison and a $500,000 fine. The sheriff said if charges were filed, his office would seek restitution, but he didn't know the total cost of the rescue effort, which included military helicopters, a ground rescue and even a mounted posse. Officials also rerouted planes around the balloon's flight path and briefly shut down some flights from Denver International Airport.
Alderden said the parents Richard and Mayumi Heene "put on a very go
Hmm, I believe some people here were criticizing me for bringing up filing a false police report as well as how serious a matter it was for re-routing air traffic around Denver International.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.