I liked it for what it was star trek ,yes its not tos but how can you not enjoy this different take on a classic show .Star trek tos is and will be star trek to me,if new actors are going to do it now , dont copy what you can not beat, but put a new spin on it to be close to it .It makes me wonder what they liked about the 1966 show to begin with, or indeed even if they did at all. What the elder show cultivated in me was the desire to look at things from both sides and to try to respect those other opinions without resorting to insults or violence.
No one in this thread has asked you to. Perhaps you were looking for another thread?I refuse to be apologetic for Trek being critically praised, financially successful, and widely popular.
TY
RAMA
Those for and against have largely fallen into two archetypes, both of which are seriously starting to get on my nerves.
For: OMG, THIS IS THE BEST EVER, ANYONE WHO THINKS OTHERWISE IS A TOTAL LOSER!
Against: THIS VIOLATES CANON, IT IS CRAP!
Rational discourse falls by the wayside and it's hard to get a thought in edgewise.
It's rare to find anyone here that is able to say the movie was fun but it was still badly done (Brutal Strudel does a great job of doing this balancing act).
Anyone else getting a little tired of it all?
Franklin, well, of course but I first started watching it when I was young and impressionable (not saying you weren't young when YOU watched it, just delving a little into my own background). The fact that they used reason on more than one occasion to work out a problem inspired me. Whether the show justified that inspiration or not, I can't say.
It makes me wonder what they liked about the 1966 show to begin with, or indeed even if they did at all. What the elder show cultivated in me was the desire to look at things from both sides and to try to respect those other opinions without resorting to insults or violence.
It makes me wonder what they liked about the 1966 show to begin with, or indeed even if they did at all. What the elder show cultivated in me was the desire to look at things from both sides and to try to respect those other opinions without resorting to insults or violence.
It's rare to find anyone here that is able to say the movie was fun but it was still badly done (Brutal Strudel does a great job of doing this balancing act).
I think the movie was fun and well done.
Is that irrational?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.