• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Both Sides Give Me a Headache

I refuse to be apologetic for Trek being critically praised, financially successful, and widely popular.

TY

RAMA
 
I'm not sick of both sides per se, I just wish they would both be civil and allow for a simple difference of opinion, and have discussions rather than attack each other as being idiots or elitists.

I mean, that's what it is, a frakking opinion. Everyone's entitled to them. :rommie:
 
It makes me wonder what they liked about the 1966 show to begin with, or indeed even if they did at all. What the elder show cultivated in me was the desire to look at things from both sides and to try to respect those other opinions without resorting to insults or violence.
I liked it for what it was star trek ,yes its not tos but how can you not enjoy this different take on a classic show .Star trek tos is and will be star trek to me,if new actors are going to do it now , dont copy what you can not beat, but put a new spin on it to be close to it .
 
I refuse to be apologetic for Trek being critically praised, financially successful, and widely popular.

TY

RAMA
No one in this thread has asked you to. Perhaps you were looking for another thread?
 
Those for and against have largely fallen into two archetypes, both of which are seriously starting to get on my nerves.

For: OMG, THIS IS THE BEST EVER, ANYONE WHO THINKS OTHERWISE IS A TOTAL LOSER!

Against: THIS VIOLATES CANON, IT IS CRAP!

Rational discourse falls by the wayside and it's hard to get a thought in edgewise.

It's rare to find anyone here that is able to say the movie was fun but it was still badly done (Brutal Strudel does a great job of doing this balancing act).

Anyone else getting a little tired of it all?

First...to keep the discussion "rational" as you said...remember that noone on either side posted in CAPS LOCK...or with OMG!!!!1111 IT IS NOT TEH CANNNNON!!!!111 not that you did that, but we've all seen that leet stuff thrown around even though nobody really did that.

I had a problem with some of the gushers before the movie came out because you'd say something like the bridge was too white, then they'd peg you as a grandpa that didn't want change and that I must want the bridge to look exactly like the TOS one.
I enjoyed the movie immensely I should mention.
 
Well, archetypes are generally...generalizations:) I was just using shorthand to sum up the vitriol expressed by both sides.
 
Franklin, well, of course but I first started watching it when I was young and impressionable (not saying you weren't young when YOU watched it, just delving a little into my own background). The fact that they used reason on more than one occasion to work out a problem inspired me. Whether the show justified that inspiration or not, I can't say.

Well, I was young. Tweeners, they call 'em, today. And the only real effect TOS had on me was to make me go :drool: at how Theiss dressed many of THE WOMEN. ;) Seriously, that and liking the characters. I wanted to be Kirk. See, I don't care for any other science fiction other than Trek, unless Red Dwarf counts. If it weren't for the characters, the show (and DS9 and TNG, which I watched) would mean nothing to me.

But, I do appreciate your point of view.
 
Praetor, don't go down that long dark path;)

But thank you, Franklin, that's the kind of post I enjoy. I know you guys are capable of them!
 
It makes me wonder what they liked about the 1966 show to begin with, or indeed even if they did at all. What the elder show cultivated in me was the desire to look at things from both sides and to try to respect those other opinions without resorting to insults or violence.

i could flip that around and say that is a pretty simplistic viewpoint of
the series.
yes at it's best it had that but then again there were also some great episodes that are fan favorites were you either had insults or violence and in some cases both.

really sometimes the moral theme got laid on so thick the message got lost with last battlefield perhaps the best example.
lacking in subility there is no empathy or attempt to see how the two characters got to the point there were.
yeah we know blind bigotry is stupid but it is easier to expose it when one sees how subtle it can be and how easily it can worm a way within a society.

want insults check out kirk in several episodes.

we dont really see the klingons point of view in errand of mercy.
just all of sudden things escalated between the klingons and the federation with the klingons coming across as nasty agressors until the organians smack both sides on the nose.

as for the movie.. heck the big sub theme is getting young kirk and spock to gradually see each others point of view.
 
I did mention it's just what it meant to me as a VERY young person (I'm talking 6 and 7 years old), I didn't intend it to be an in-depth analysis of the overall series, Pookha.

Indeed, I wasn't even referencing it against XI. I was referencing it against the people who seem so intolerant of other viewpoints.
 
hm this is tolerant toward those who like the movie..

It makes me wonder what they liked about the 1966 show to begin with, or indeed even if they did at all. What the elder show cultivated in me was the desire to look at things from both sides and to try to respect those other opinions without resorting to insults or violence.



well perhaps there is a new meaning to the word in some parallel universe.
;)
 
Yeah, well, you're completely misreading the intent and no disrespect, but I don't think you read through the whole thread to understand what I was talking about.

Once again, I was talking about the people on BOTH sides who have been intolerant of each other. Doesn't seem very Treklike to me.

If you choose to believe I was insulting fans of the movie, that's on your own understanding, not mine.
 
your intent may have been to make a comment about the extreme of either side but the impression came about because you said the above after several people commented they liked the movie.
the timing was interesting.
and after all the your example of the ideal rational poster here was ..
It's rare to find anyone here that is able to say the movie was fun but it was still badly done (Brutal Strudel does a great job of doing this balancing act).

as someone else noted what does that say about those who use who believe it is both fun and a good though not perfect film.


and well part of it is we have heard the song and dance so often of you are not a true trek fan if you like this movie people perhaps get a little gun shy..
especially considering what you posted as your rational ideal.
:)
 
Well, all films have flaws, doesn't mean you enjoy them any less. Well, not all films but most.

Surely you recognize the plot holes and the contrivances in the film. It doesn't mean they weren't ENJOYABLE holes and contrivances.

And I could care less about TOS in regards to my opinion of the movie. I could bring that into the equation but I try not to. I always try to ask myself...am I just saying that because it's really something that would annoy me in any movie or is it just because it's a franchise I enjoy so.
 
Jesus! All this arguing in this thread has given me a headache! :guffaw:

I'll admit that I've conducted myself -- at times -- less than steller...but sometimes with all the agreeing it's a little boring. I know that's a terrible thing to say but I'm just trying to be honest. :eek:
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top