I'm not talking about this time period.During the time of Discovery they quite clearly are part of Starfleet, given they have a unit based on Discovery, and the entire scene in the OP.
I'm talking about Enterprise and DS9.
I'm not talking about this time period.During the time of Discovery they quite clearly are part of Starfleet, given they have a unit based on Discovery, and the entire scene in the OP.
But why take the risk, for someone they know is more likely than not to betray them? What advantage do they gain by even trying to co-opt or manipulate her? MUGeorgiou's one and only useful characteristic was that she could pass for an otherwise deceased Starfleet captain, and now that Starfleet's disavowed her, that's shot to hell too. She not only has no loyalty to the Federation, she has little to no knowledge of its universe, no skills at how to navigate it, and no useful connections there. Recruiting her — indeed, even revealing their existence to her — makes no sense whatsoever in-universe. If all they want is someone ruthlessly immoral, surely there are qualified candidates who at least know the lay of the land.
They're not officially sanctioned and they report to no-one. They're an extra-legal entity.
They are not Starfleet.
Somebody said before the writers just on a whim made the black badges Section 31, and that it wasn't planned from the start.Since CBS owns Section 31 I doubt anyone had to approve it's use in DISCO. Books and comics ( and even the films) are licensed products. The TV shows, not so much.
Yes, and because Section 31 is part of their movies, they will have been informed. Do you not think the two companies about to start merging together are talking to each other about Star Trek on a regular basis, especially given that CBS manages licensing and merchandising for the movies on behalf of Viacom, a company you didn't even know existed?Because CBS let them use the licence.
CBS owns all of Star Trek, Paramount/Viacom just has the rights to make movies,
The top argument levelled against Discovery is that they are coming up with too many original ideas and concepts that are too different to what's come before...
Yes, and because Section 31 is part of their movies, they will have been informed.
Nope because they own the character.If there's about to be a new actor playing Spock on television, do you not think CBS has to tell Viacom?
You don't watch the show, from your own admission. Honestly, you are a bandwidth waster that adds nothing to this section of the forum. You're a troll, and everyone sees it.I have yet to see anyone make that argument, outside of the visual changes. The story components are 95% pure fanwank.
Used to be, the shows would open up new elements of the universe, the novels/comics (if one was so interested), came around and filled in the blanks. Now, all Star Trek is on TV is "fill-in-the-blanks".
You don't watch the show, from your own admission. Honestly, you are a bandwidth waster that adds nothing to this section of the forum. You're a troll, and everyone sees it.
I don't think that's how it works.Yes, and because Section 31 is part of their movies, they will have been informed.
No.If there's about to be a new actor playing Spock on television, do you not think CBS has to tell Viacom?
Stop replying because your comments are getting dumber and dumber.Section 31 is owned by CBS they don't need to tell them squat.
Nope because they own the character.
You've seen all of the episodes, don't even try to bullshit me.I've seen twelve of the fifteen episodes, and have stated such on numerous occasions. Care to try again?
I don't think that's how merchandising licensing works.CBS has to merchandise the new movie coming out, so yes, they are telling Viacom what they're planning, because you know, if there are two Spock action figures out at Walmart, they will dent each other's sales.
CBS has to merchandise the new movie coming out, so yes, they are telling Viacom what they're planning, because you know, if there are two Spock action figures out at Walmart, they will dent each other's sales.
Don't talk about things you don't understand.
You've seen all of the episodes, don't even try to bullshit me.
It happened with the JJ movies.CBS has to merchandise the new movie coming out, so yes, they are telling Viacom what they're planning, because you know, if there are two Spock action figures out at Walmart, they will dent each other's sales.
You just said he didn't watch the show.You've seen all of the episodes, don't even try to bullshit me.
PM me with spoilers.Nope. Care to try again? First I haven't seen it, then I've seen it all... what's next? I've secretly seen season two?![]()
Yes, and Viacom is their absolute biggest partner for the franchise, to the extent this TV series has the same executive producer.CBS owns Star Trek. Go look at newer novels and discs. All the Trademarks are owned by CBS.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.