I understand your point, I do however I think anybody that has watched the Discovery Channel or nature survival shows knows that the longer you survive in the wild, the better at it you become. Voyager stuck to it's premise during seasons 1 into part of 3. After 3rd season they knew how to get by in the DQ, so issues of energy & supplies stop being an issue.MacLeod said:
presence said:
It seems like we sometimes bring our expectataions of how Voyager "should be" and then fault the show for not living up to our wishes. Why come to it with an agenda at all? Why not enjoy it, just as it is? It doesn't have to be like TNG, DS9, or even something my Aunt Martha said. When I first heard about the series, I groaned. It sounded to me like the Federation meets "Lost In Space". Now that I'm watching it, I think GR would be smiling.
Which is all very well and good, but after the highs of DSN and TNG, for me VOY fell somewhat flat. Sure it had it's moments but I found them far too few. As for Charatcers the only one I found remotly interesting was the Doctor.
Sure VOY had a great premise that many myself included think it failed to live up to. For those that enjoyed it the way it was that's great, but perhaps if some of the things that annoy the people who think Voyager failed to live up to its premise where included perhaps for you it would have turned from a great show in to a truly excellent show.
Voyager and it's crew learned to adapt.