I would prefer a release between April and August, or October and December.
I find it disgusting that "Black Panther" is the only MCU film that was given a February release. And if "Deadpool" was released in February, that tells me that the studio originally didn't have high expectations for it. And I can only assume that the MCU has low expectations for "Black Panther".
You're random conspiracy theories never fail to amuse.
Logan was released on 1st March and did just fine, only a few weeks after BP's current release date.
Let's not also forget that Marvel has THREE films out in 2018 -
Black Panther, Avengers Infinity War and
Ant Man & The Wasp... spreading them out seems sensible to me.
I also wouldn't be surprised if BP has a decent sized role in
Avengers 4 so it makes sense to give him a proper lead in after his taster in
Civil War. I also feel it to be a bizarre fallacy that a good film can't make money wherever it's placed. The market is already super-saturated with tent-pole films, with films cannibalising each others box office, much to studio detriment.
Over recent years distributors have been spreading their wares out a little thinner across the year in an attempt to give a touch of breathing room for their properties. Can't see any different here. Even if
Deadpool was a "fluke" it still shows that people will go and watch a good film (subjective there I know) no matter the time of year.
If you really want to stretch marketing opportunities, February is Black History Month in the US, and given Marvel are making a film with a largely black cast, a black director, a black writer I've no doubt (cynical or not) they will look at capitalising on their diversity as part of their production.
So, yeah, sure, Marvel must have no confidence in their new hero and product because, February...
Hugo - wants a trailer