• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Bigfoot.

Rincewiend

Admiral
Admiral
So i was visiting one of my favourite time-wasting websites called Listverse and they had a list of 20 Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Yeti sightings...

http://listverse.com/2011/05/23/top-20-bigfoot-sightings/

Personally i always thought that of the many cryptozoids(?) it's probably the most likely to really exist...
Some of the footage is really amazing and could make me say that there might be a lot of thruth in it's existence...
 
Some of the footage is really amazing and could make me say that there might be a lot of thruth in it's existence...
I've been told that there's one born every minute.

My personal feeling is that all the bigfoots are hiding in their flying saucers.

---------------
 
The one thing I really question about Bigfoot is that I am sure we would have at least found the bones or remains of one by now.
 
For some reason my first thought on seeing this thread was a nostalgic longing for "In Search Of..."
 
The one thing I really question about Bigfoot is that I am sure we would have at least found the bones or remains of one by now.

Unless there's just one. ;)
With a really, REALLY long lifespan.

That's the problem with all these cryptozoological creatures -- for any of them to exist, there would have to be a breeding population, meaning at least several hundred individuals. Surely we'd have definitive proof by now -- a carcass or two, or at least some verifiable film/video footage that's not a guy in an ape suit.
 
What the heck, I'm bored; I'll play devil's advocate.

The Patterson film is the only film footage I would consider to be likely authentic, most of the other films and stills seem unconvincing and are likely hoaxes. The Patterson film has been analyzed to death, and not only does it hold up to scrutiny, but biomechanical experts have shown that no guy in an ape suit could walk or move the way the thing in that film does.

As far as finding bones goes, actually we rarely find bones of any creature in the wild, even members of species of high population density, especially in forested areas where scavengers scatter bones and what's left gets covered up with leaves and moss to decay in a matter of months! So it's not surprising, much less problematical, that we don't find the bones of a species of such low population density as a Sasquatch would have, if it exists.

As far as breeding populations go, we're talking about remote wilderness areas where nobody goes, and even to this day are rarely explored. So it's entirely possible that such habitats support breeding populations. It’s only when we encroach on the fringes of their vast uncharted territory that we have the occasional encounter.

Having said all the above, I should probably state, for the record, that I am far from convinced myself on the subject, but I do try to be fair minded and knowledgeable on both sides of the issue about this and other things.
 
Last edited:
That's the problem with all these cryptozoological creatures -- for any of them to exist, there would have to be a breeding population, meaning at least several hundred individuals. Surely we'd have definitive proof by now -- a carcass or two, or at least some verifiable film/video footage that's not a guy in an ape suit.
Well, to be fair there are and have been endangered species of animals with a total population down in the double digits or single digits.

Having said that, I agree we would have definitive proof by now. Scientists have been able to keep tabs on the rarest of large animals when they live in areas as remote as central Africa. The idea that such a large and unusual species could go barely detected in the tourist-attracting mountains of the western United States is hard for me to swallow.
 
Well, to be fair there are and have been endangered species of animals with a total population down in the double digits or single digits.

Having said that, I agree we would have definitive proof by now. Scientists have been able to keep tabs on the rarest of large animals when they live in areas as remote as central Africa. The idea that such a large and unusual species could go barely detected in the tourist-attracting mountains of the western United States is hard for me to swallow.

But playing devil's advocate again, it could be said in all fairness that mainstream scientists have never taken Bigfoot (or any other cryptic) seriously, considering it a waste of time and resources. Since this is the case, nobody with the proper training and resources has even been trying to "keep tabs" on this, it's therefore been left up to mostly amateurs (and a few scientists) who lack the proper research funding and training to track down and observe such a rare and intelligent species as this creature would be.

And again, we're not talking about "tourist-attracting mountains" here, this creature obviously avoids these areas like the plague, we're talking about remote still-largely-unexplored areas. It's only occasionally therefore, when our logging and other activities push into new wilderness areas that likely genuine contact has occurred.

The proper analogy here as rare species go, is with rumors of the Mountain Gorilla or the Giant Panda, both of which went unconfirmed for several generations before any hard evidence was obtained for scientists to study, prior to which mainstream scientists were just as dismissive of these creatures, as they are now about Sasquatch! Considering the modern hoopla over Bigfoot has only prevailed since about the mid sixties of the last century, we may have yet awhile before any hard evidence in the form of captive or killed specimens of these creatures (if they exist) comes our way?

What clouds the issue is all the hoaxes out there, if you see a fuzzy picture of a hairy creature that was supposedly taken in somebody's backyard (figuratively or literally) then chances are it's not real, these are a dime a dozen, and this makes it seem that Bigfoot are all over the place, when in fact they would be quite rare (again, If they do indeed exist).

So I am inclined to be patient and reserve final judgment before dismissing the subject altogether.
 
Last edited:
^^ :lol: I used to like watching The Six-Million Dollar Man, but by that point the show had really gotten silly.
 
There's certainly enough possiblity for some sort of cryptozoological creatures out there to exist, most likely a "bigfoot"-like creature. Wilderness area are sparsely populated, difficult to navigate and prone to weather conditions on how easy they are to survive in for any length of time. Given how tough predators and scavengers are in forested areas it's possible for a creature to go undiscovered for a period of time any carcass would be quickly scavenged and decompose in an area not often traveled by man. There's still countless species still out there not yet discovered -granted many of these are going to be insects and arachnids- and even species presumed extinct have turned up as still in surviving populations.

Of all crytptozoological creatures bigfoot is one of the few that I can "believe" is out there, somewhere, in some form. There's enough reasonable "maybe" there. Creatures like the Loch Ness Monster, however, not so much.
 
There's certainly enough possiblity for some sort of cryptozoological creatures out there to exist, most likely a "bigfoot"-like creature.
Why "most likely"?

Of all crytptozoological creatures bigfoot is one of the few that I can "believe" is out there, somewhere, in some form.
Oh, I see.

I think "bigfoot" is one of the least likely creatures to be discovered, partly because they're "seen" so often and yet remain "undiscovered".

---------------
 
Sightings of civets in Japan used to be debunked, but I actually saw one walking down the street in front of my house about two years ago. It jumped up gracefully onto meter-high wall and walked along it, just as a cat would. And recently a few dead ones have been found. They must have entered the country illegally, but there do seem to be a few of them here, although sightings are still very rare. And after looking at pictures of them on the Web, I believe the one I saw could win a beauty contest. It was all brown except for its black feet and raccoon mask.
 
They must have entered the country illegally, but there do seem to be a few of them here, although sightings are still very rare.
Damned illegal civets, sneaking into the country and taking jobs from hard-working Japanese cats!
 
I've been told that there's one born every minute.

Yeah, and even the smart ones get suckered when they don't do their homework. That old hoaxer really made Leonard Nimoy look like an ass.
 
Videos can be faked. Witnesses lie to get attention. Show me physical evidence.

bigfoot.jpg
 
^^ Proof positive that it’s the Bigfoots who are responsible for making crop circles!
 
I saw Bigfoot once, several years ago. I was driving down a road when I saw the creature standing at the edge of the woods. When my car came around the corner, it turned and ran into the woods.

Well...actually, the road I was driving down was in a residential neighborhood, the "Bigfoot" was just a young kid in some kind of shaggy, brown costume with a hood (Halloween costume? Who knows?), and the "woods" he dashed into were just a single, three-quarter acre, overgrown lot. But, hey, for a kid, it was still a pretty neat attempted prank!

And, to this day, of all the Bigfoot sightings I've ever seen or read about, this one still tops my list as the most convincing. :lol:
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top