A little off topic but in one of the relaunch books it was mentioned that Picard offered Pulaski the CMO role on the Enterprise-E after Crusher left at the end of Nemesis. She turned him down.
I preferred Pulaski - better actress, better character, and more credible all-around.
After all, the only reason Beverly was there in the first place was to provide "conflict" with Picard - because of their past, and his part in Jack Crusher's death.
Pulaski was opinionated, but she stood up for her patients (ie. Deanna, when she was pregnant). She wasn't a static character, as she eventually came to regard Data as more than a mere piece of walking hardware. And she had a respectful relationship with Worf (although I find it difficult to believe that Klingons have a tea ceremony!).
Sums up my feelings on Pulaski as well.
I'll also add that she was the only character on TNG to truly question and challenge Picard. She really pushed his shit in, which, imo, was what he really needed in terms of his own character development. I had hoped Riker would've been that defiant character, but somewhere along the way he got castrated... oh say about after "Best of Both Worlds, part II."
She felt like a fully-formed character and person, unlike Crusher, and while Pulaski has her roots in McCoy, the character and actress transcended the retread origins in just one season.
Whereas I never felt Crusher moved beyond being Janice Rand with a medical degree, i.e. the love interest that Picard (or Kirk) could never really have.
Moreover, I couldn't stand Gates McFadden's performance in the role or how the character was written. Crusher got more and more shrewish as time wore on. Q was right when he transfigured her into a yapping dog in "True Q."
"She gets more shrill with each passing year." (Q) Yeah, she did.
Here's what I posted in the other Pulaski thread, riffing off Timewalker's post in that very thread.
I preferred Pulaski - better actress, better character, and more credible all-around.
After all, the only reason Beverly was there in the first place was to provide "conflict" with Picard - because of their past, and his part in Jack Crusher's death.
Pulaski was opinionated, but she stood up for her patients (ie. Deanna, when she was pregnant). She wasn't a static character, as she eventually came to regard Data as more than a mere piece of walking hardware. And she had a respectful relationship with Worf (although I find it difficult to believe that Klingons have a tea ceremony!).
Sums up my feelings on Pulaski as well.
I'll also add that she was the only character on TNG to truly question and challenge Picard. She really pushed his shit in, which, imo, was what he really needed in terms of his own character development. I had hoped Riker would've been that defiant character, but somewhere along the way he got castrated... oh say about after "Best of Both Worlds, part II."
She felt like a fully-formed character and person, unlike Crusher, and while Pulaski has her roots in McCoy, the character and actress transcended the retread origins in just one season.
Whereas I never felt Crusher moved beyond being Janice Rand with a medical degree, i.e. the love interest that Picard (or Kirk) could never really have.
Moreover, I couldn't stand Gates McFadden's performance in the role or how the character was written. Crusher got more and more shrewish as time wore on. Q was right when he transfigured her into a yapping dog in "True Q."
"She gets more shrill with each passing year." (Q) Yeah, she did.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.