Well for my part I don't think I have ever brought up The Orville on this board as I only just have seen it recently. As for Voyager it's everyone else that brings it up hereI prefer not to have the comparisons made. That's my personal desire in order to approach things as they are in reality, not just my personal expectations. I'm not perfect at it, but that's a goal.
If the comparisons are made, I feel the need to defend DISCO, largely because I do admit my bias in that I think there is a bunch of unloving critics who use things like VOY, Orville, or whatnot to beat DISCO with.
Seriously though, do you feel you need to filter Discovery through a dislike of previous Trek to give it credibility? I wonder if that is a natural defence mechanism. Like if Discovery is all that, then surely there would be no need to piss on any other show because Discovery would be stand alone good, right?
To borrow your template: (where relevant)Well, if we're going to go with other series, we might as well go all in.
Well, if we're going to go with other series, we might as well go all in.
Star Trek:
TOS --> My Favorite
TNG --> It's Okay, sometimes Really Great, but sometimes it makes me cringe.
DS9 --> My Favorite of the '90s Series.
VOY --> It's Okay overall, but it really depends on the episode. It's like New England weather.
ENT --> It's the one Star Trek series I couldn't get into. It just didn't click with me.
DSC --> My Other Favorite
Other Space-Based Series:
The Orville --> I like it, I get a kick out of it.
Battlestar Galactica (2000s version) --> Great, better than anything... until it wasn't.
Farscape --> Nutty, fun, crazy, and it kept you on your toes.
Firefly --> Kicks ass and takes names.
Babylon 5 --> I've barely seen any of it. At some point before I die, I will.
Stargate (any of them) --> Not my thing.
Star Wars --> I'll see the movies, and I like them, but I'm not a hardcore fan. I'm a layman.
Doctor Who --> I like Tom Baker, David Tennant, and Matt Smith. I'm looking forward to Jodie Whittaker.
I think I've covered the major bases.
On this board? No. On the General Trek board? Yes.Well for my part I don't think I have ever brought up The Orville on this board as I only just have seen it recently. As for Voyager it's everyone else that brings it up here
Since The Orville was mentioned. It is pretty good.
I do try and keep shows comments to their own boards unless I'm responding to another show already brought up. Thing is The Orville hasn't got a board has it? There was a thread here but I was out of the loop for months, so late to the party! I think it (The Orville) shows a liking for Trek.On this board? No. On the General Trek board? Yes.
Yeah, people will compare. It's a human function. SF Debris did it in his DISCO reviews. By the way, you might enjoy them. A lot of his points reminds me of some of your remarks as well.
You don't say?I think it (The Orville) shows a liking for Trek.
Well put.Best Trek ever? Well, no, I don’t think so. Not yet. But the funny thing is that even though I agree with most of the criticisms that I see offered by others, the flaws don’t bother me much at all. I’m finding myself engaged with the characters, ship and universe in a way that I haven’t been since I was a kid watching the first one.
Struggling? Hardly it would seem:So it's 'flaming' reaction, lol. Like payback because Discovery is struggling to hold its own??
So, it's fully compliant with all recent post 1987 and classic Star Trek then.The plotting on this series has sunk to "Trekkies will eat anything" levels.
My take: If we're going to compare to DISCO to the previous shows, we should compare it to the shows as they actually were, not to some idealized, rose-tinted memory of them.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.