Aside from how flat it is, I like the Discoprise. It's not as good as the original or the 2009 version, but I prefer it to the refit and the Beyond Enterprise-A.
I'm not seeing any resemblance.the more it looks like the that Uss Kelvin kitbash thats out there thats made up to look like the enterprise with a neck and pylons
I like the Abramsverse version far more than what we have with Discovery. The Abramsverse version retains the optimistic look of the future. Lighter colors for the ships, better lighting.
It is a shame that overall Discovery has really missed the point of Star Trek's look. An optimistic view of the future that actually looks optimistic. They have fallen in the trap of things looking dark and gritty, and it simply doesn't match up with the rest of the franchise
.
Yeah, the TOS Connie wasn't that bright. It's a light grey.
![]()
![]()
The Kelvin Constitution is closer to the Refit colouring.
![]()
Heh...I just realized what the Discoprise reminds me of. The old Franklin Mint pewter Enterprises, with their 24k deflector dishes:
![]()
It's like I'm watching season 2!
![]()
Thanks to the passage of time, some of them even have modernized nacelles:
![]()
Would look perfectly at home next to Discovery.
![]()
It DEFINITELY looks like Bridge window behind some semi-transparent material. Transparent trilithium alloy perhaps?
Not going to lie. I think spikes would like nice on the nacelles. Not just because of "The Cage" but spikes fit Disco.
![]()
Would look perfectly at home next to Discovery.
Look, this might just be my personal gripe based in a design background, but it's hard to believe that, if the DSC version were the original and the TOS ship were the update, we wouldn't be having this exact same conversation. I've yet to see any reasonable evidence that the original adheres to some kind of golden ratio of design or elegance of form that isn't influenced by sixty years of familiarity, nostalgia, and reflection. I've seen people map out the original's dimensions to demonstrate its mathematical elegance, and it's always according a naturally subjective and selective perception of forms based on design rules that frankly aren't the end all of design.
It seems to me that we're never going to be able to adequately judge or evaluate the goodness of the original or any reimaginings thereof because we can't turn off decades of personal perception and immersion in Star Trek.
Looks like Kelvin Enterprise.Thanks to the passage of time, some of them even have modernized nacelles:
![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.