Yeah, we get it, you don't like the new
Star Trek.
And?
Just keep reminding yourself one of two things:
1) This film is evil, and anyone who enjoys it is also evil,
or
2) This film is orgasmic, and anyone who rejects it is an evil moron.
Obviously, those are the only two choices, right?
Me, I really, really dislike the movie at its core, even though there were bits and pieces of it which I did like. I had high hopes initially, and got more "down" on it as more of the bad (IMHO) choices became public... and all the more so as the reasons BEHIND those choices were made public.
Abrams simply doesn't get Star Trek. Much as he didn't get "Superman." Any of you ever see the Abrams-written script he came up with for his "Superman" movie? Again, it shows a complete lack of respect for the core elements of the source material.
While I can't immediately find the scanned posting of his Superman script, here's a bit from "Ain't it Cool" reviewing it. Obviously, a lot of personal stuff in here which you can just scan over, but pay attention to the basics of the script.
http://www.aintitcool.com/display.cgi?id=13350
Awful... just awful. And that's pretty much the same approach Abrams took with Trek... keep a few visibly-recognizable surface elements, but deeply change the central tenets. THAT is what I dislike about the new movie, ultimately. It's not the same... it's not even close... it's a "changeling," pretending to be something which it isn't... and something which it really almost OPPOSES.