Since when has a burrito not been generic? It's a pretty common food product.
Way to miss the point. Of course TOS gave us Space Hippies.Perhaps TOS characters referred to, say, the Monkees, or TNG Nirvana, but I can't remember.
The same as reason as any piece of fiction. It's the way real people talk.Of course, they will, but in fictional storytelling there's always a reason why characters are made to do so. What is the reason for this one?
You're reading way more into the food choices than the writers ever did. Yeah some were character bits. Other were just ordinary things like chicken sandwiches and coffee or a burrito. They're exist to show the characters are just like us.The examples you gave sound very generic. I recall more specific types of food are mentioned in other shows, and I could always figure out the reasons why they appeared: Earl Grey tea and the idea that Picard's character is European (to show another dimension of the "beige" atmosphere of the show), one of those time travel episodes from Voyager involving food that reminded them of American baseball (and many things that the crew misses as they are so far away from their homes), and Scotch for the original cast (perhaps reflecting not only leisurely views of drinking from the '60s but also the view that outside the search for "strange new worlds" they also sought what was both familiar and strangely valuable).
Teen profanity?Perhaps there are similar reasons for having contemporary teenage profanity, burritos, and club music for the last few episodes of this franchise, but I still have to find them, or we can probably wait and see if more references crop up. For now, I can only guess that writers are trying to appeal to young viewers.
Well, it was certainly clear she thought so. Just a bunch of goddamn technobabble bullshit to me.And the stuff Tilly was working on WAS fucking cool.
First time I watched that scene, I bursted out laughing. Of course, wordplay's kinda my thing--I'm the guy who literally couldn't breathe while watching and rewatching the Taxi scene where Christopher Lloyd asks "Whaaaaat doooooes a yeeeeeeellow liiiiiiiight meeeeeeean?" YMMV.I'd be stunned in any century if I heard someone say "well, double dumbass on you"
I miss the tea and Shakespeare and classical music concerts, damn it! *pout*And, honestly, you want do want keep things a little realistic and down-to-earth just to avoid giving the impression that STAR TREK is rooted in some sort of old-fashioned notion of "refinement" in which progress consists of everybody sipping tea, quoting Shakespeare, and enjoying Gilbert & Sullivan.![]()
Touché."You see, in our century we've learned not to fear words."
Technically the bad language and other phrases they use do not jibe well with TOS. Phrases like "Seriously??", "Don't get your panties in a bunch", and "this is so fucking cool" are not the kind of phrases we ever heard in the original series. Kirk and Spock were also out of place when trying to use curse words in Star Trek 4. They did it to make the characters more relatable to today's generation at the price of making them unrelatable to the original series.
I figured Kirk called Mccoy "Bones" because of what Mccoy said in Star Trek 2009 regarding his ex-wife taking everything in the divorce and "all he had left was his bones". But yeah they make them sound 2017ish and not TOSish. The price for that is it feels less like they're really in the same era as TOS. Ah well, suspension of disbelief againAs opposed to Kirk joking about dipping little girl's pigtails in inkwells? Or calling the ship's doctor "Bones" like the '"sawbones" in an old TV western?
TOS's dialogue sounded casual and colloquial to audiences in the 1960s, just as DISCO's dialogue sounds casual and colloquial to audiences in 2017. It's all about not sounding stiff and stilted just because you're in the future.
I figured Kirk called Mccoy "Bones" because of what Mccoy said in Star Trek 2009 regarding his ex-wife taking everything in the divorce and "all he had left was his bones". But yeah they make them sound 2017ish and not TOSish. The price for that is it feels less like they're really in the same era as TOS. Ah well, suspension of disbelief again
Technically the bad language and other phrases they use do not jibe well with TOS. Phrases like "Seriously??", "Don't get your panties in a bunch", and "this is so fucking cool" are not the kind of phrases we ever heard in the original series. Kirk and Spock were also out of place when trying to use curse words in Star Trek 4. They did it to make the characters more relatable to today's generation at the price of making them unrelatable to the original series.
I take it you still think having a character say "fucking" must be some tactic to appeal to youth culture rather than the most likely reason being that it's just a common phrase warm blooded adults use every now and then?
I mean, I'm pretty sure "fucking" was as commonly used in the 1960s as is today. The only big difference is that television in certain sections, out of reach from uppity parents, are no longer arbitrarily restricted from uttering that word. I'm pretty sure if 1960s television didn't have restrictions over certain words we would have heard an f-bomb in Star Trek.
I would also like to know what exactly burritos have to do with... anything.
Should we declare ENT non-canon because there was a reference to Hoshi eating soba noodles, which also never appeared in TOS?
Kor
Nobody was ever going to utter "fucking" on UPN.Well, it did involve Tilly, who based on her character is one of the youngest in the group. I think the only thing missing was the high rising terminal and use of words such as "like."
Next, I don't think it was commonly used in the 1960s, and isn't commonly used today. By that, I mean the use of profanity to describe almost everything by generally all age groups in all circumstances.
Finally, given your argument, we should have seen that f-bomb across various TV shows during the last few years. Why didn't it show up? Probably because the use of language isn't ultimately driven by being "uppity" but by other factors.
Were there threads like this in 2009 when Kirk said "bullshit" to Spock Prime?
I swear, some folks are just LOOKING for things to not like in DISCO and make a mountain out of a mole hill, however incidental.
I'm surprised nobody is upset that beer pong was featured. I mean, that game was never shown in any iteration of Trek, so it must be a canon violation. Am I doing this right? Oh, and burritos, because I live in a world where burritos were only associated with "youth culture".
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.