• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Aw, crud! Margaret Clark is gone now, too.

David, I know about Promises Broken, I was hoping for something more. C'est la vie.

What past and present tie-in lines do Pocket do?
 
And WAREHOUSE 13 is crying out for a book line . . . .
Indeed. If its ratings continue to top 4.4 million unique viewers per week, it might have a large enough fan base to sustain a tie-in book line. And I'd really like to write one of those...
 
Well thats funny, all that came up was the Google Australia home page :rolleyes:

Sorry, it works as link in Australia, providing me with about ten pages of links to Pocket media tie-ins, past and present.

Go to Google and type in: "Pocket Books" tie-ins
as your search term to replicate my search.

I really hate that rolls-eyes emoticon. It's so annoying.
 
^ It worked for me too (and I'm in the U.S., not Australia). But even if it hadn't, I don't see how anybody, least of all Therin, earned an eye-rolling.
 
And some series don't even get tie-in novels. Man, I would kill to read some NCIS novels, preferably written by Dayton.

But as far as I know Bellisario is against having tie-in books. :sigh:
I would read those. As for Bellisario, he left so you never know...

I'd loved to have done one for Rome.
I would read that...

And I'd have loved to have seen one (or many) for Jericho. :(
...those too..

I'd love to do a CHUCK novel.

And WAREHOUSE 13 is crying out for a book line . . .
.
...and those.
Me too.
 
^ It worked for me too (and I'm in the U.S., not Australia). But even if it hadn't, I don't see how anybody, least of all Therin, earned an eye-rolling.
Sorry; I was trying to demonstrate how useless and annoying it is to respond with eye-rolling to posts that made honest mistakes.

He did it, and I did it right back.

It's possible the underlying sarcasm was lost.
 
^ That's not exactly true. There are still three editors in that department; it simply has not been publicly announced yet who is assuming responsibility for the Star Trek titles. We all need to just be calm, and in time this will all work itself out.
 
I'm afraid that I must now reveal that I am the new editor, and there are going to be some changes.

Expect nine DS9 novels a year! :devil:
 
^ That's not exactly true. There are still three editors in that department; it simply has not been publicly announced yet who is assuming responsibility for the Star Trek titles. We all need to just be calm, and in time this will all work itself out.

Three editors? I thought it was just Ed Schlesinger and Jennifer Heddle. Who's the third?
 
We all need to just be calm, and in time this will all work itself out.

rabble, rabble, rabble, rabble, rabble, rabble...

Come on, David. Keep calm? don't jump to conclusions? Where do you think you are posting? Everything here is either Nirvana or End Times, childhood-raping disaster. No place in here for cool heads! :lol:
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top