David, I know about Promises Broken, I was hoping for something more. C'est la vie.
What past and present tie-in lines do Pocket do?
What past and present tie-in lines do Pocket do?
What past and present tie-in lines do Pocket do?
Indeed. If its ratings continue to top 4.4 million unique viewers per week, it might have a large enough fan base to sustain a tie-in book line. And I'd really like to write one of those...And WAREHOUSE 13 is crying out for a book line . . . .
What past and present tie-in lines do Pocket do?
http://www.google.com.au/#hl=en&sou...gle+Search&meta=&aq=f&oq=&fp=9e13bf5b3a5e7afe
Well thats funny, all that came up was the Google Australia home page![]()
I really hate that rolls-eyes emoticon. It's so annoying.
What past and present tie-in lines do Pocket do?
http://www.google.com.au/#hl=en&sou...gle+Search&meta=&aq=f&oq=&fp=9e13bf5b3a5e7afe
Well thats funny, all that came up was the Google Australia home page![]()
I would read those. As for Bellisario, he left so you never know...And some series don't even get tie-in novels. Man, I would kill to read some NCIS novels, preferably written by Dayton.
But as far as I know Bellisario is against having tie-in books.![]()
I would read that...I'd loved to have done one for Rome.
...those too..And I'd have loved to have seen one (or many) for Jericho.![]()
...and those.I'd love to do a CHUCK novel.
And WAREHOUSE 13 is crying out for a book line . . .
.
Me too.
Well thats funny, all that came up was the Google Australia home page![]()
Link worked for me.![]()
Well thats funny, all that came up was the Google Australia home page![]()
Link worked for me.![]()
Sorry; I was trying to demonstrate how useless and annoying it is to respond with eye-rolling to posts that made honest mistakes.^ It worked for me too (and I'm in the U.S., not Australia). But even if it hadn't, I don't see how anybody, least of all Therin, earned an eye-rolling.
He did it, and I did it right back.
Wow I just read that Palmeri was cut last month too.
He did it, and I did it right back.
No I didn't.
Wow I just read that Palmeri was cut last month too.
Marco was let go before Christmas 2008, IIRC.
^ That's not exactly true. There are still three editors in that department; it simply has not been publicly announced yet who is assuming responsibility for the Star Trek titles. We all need to just be calm, and in time this will all work itself out.
I was expecting a KRADlist(TM). C'est la vie,What past and present tie-in lines do Pocket do?
http://www.google.com.au/#hl=en&sou...gle+Search&meta=&aq=f&oq=&fp=9e13bf5b3a5e7afe
We all need to just be calm, and in time this will all work itself out.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.