Probably a classified nomenclature for the spore drive implants.WTH is "Organ 2A-5"?
Probably a classified nomenclature for the spore drive implants.WTH is "Organ 2A-5"?
![]()
From season 1's "Choose Your Pain".
That was confirmed to be a production error.From season 1's "Choose Your Pain".
Heh yeah, IIRC that info comes from the Tardigrade display.Man, that Tardigrade DNA really messed him up. He has three lungs, four kidneys, and three stomachs.
I'm only halfway through season 3 but I have to assume that Gray becomes a compelling character in the latter half judging by people on here hoping to see him return. Because right now he's a nothing character, imo.
I'm really struggling to understand if Gray is even alive and not just some affectation of Adira's struggling mind, but that's part of their journey on the show.
No it isn't.That's a failing on your part.
The fact that DSC is the first ship-based live-action Star Trek series with a main cast of characters who aren't all bridge officers or Department Heads is part of what makes it great.
What were the other ones?
VOY?
ENT ?
TOS?
Quark is arguably a department head since he does run the station's bar.Then DS9 had Quark...
Supposed to be. Didn't really work out. And as Captain's yeoman she's bridge personnel. Smith or Jones was on the bridge too. Not sure about Colt.Well, in TOS Rand was supposed to be a main cast member, and the yeoman isn't really a bridge officer. Then DS9 had Quark...
I'm pretty sure it was hinted at during the DISCOVERY part of the Star Trek Day event that Gray was going to get a physical body at some point in the new season.Gray obviously actually exists on some level given the Kelpien holodeck could detect him and rendered him as a hologram.
TOS definately. VOYAGER and ENTERPRISE? I don't know. I'll grant that they were good in their own way. Certainly better than the shows being made now, but they weren't on par with TOS. At least I don't think so.What were the other ones?
VOY?
ENT ?
TOS?
Perhaps I misunderstood your "no it isn't". I assumed it was directed towards "ship-based live-action Star Trek series with a main cast of characters who aren't all bridge officers or Department Heads"TOS definately. VOYAGER and ENTERPRISE? I don't know. I'll grant that they were good in their own way. Certainly better than the shows being made now, but they weren't on par with TOS. At least I don't think so.
Nothing ever will be like TOS. And it can never be. Times have changed, art has changed and it is time to move forward, not look backward.TOS definately. VOYAGER and ENTERPRISE? I don't know. I'll grant that they were good in their own way. Certainly better than the shows being made now, but they weren't on par with TOS. At least I don't think so.
Backward is the only way to look.Nothing ever will be like TOS. And it can never be. Times have changed, art has changed and it is time to move forward, not look backward.
Not if you wish to move forward. Reflection can bring about positive change, but rumination just breeds depression and anxiety.Backward is the only way to look.
Not if you want a future.Backward is the only way to look.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.