So NotTrump is all in on loading up on guns and killing the spiders. The Doctor is horrified by the idea of shooting them and instead tells the team that the humane thing to do is lure them into a small room, seal them in, and wait for them to starve to death.
Why do people keep thinking that was the plan?? Jade explained earlier how her institute humanely killed spiders, and she used the same language to talk about what they'd do with the spiders
after they were contained in the panic room. It was self-evident to me that she meant she'd bring in the necessary euthanizing agents from her lab.
On the other hand, the scientist lady gets a free pass despite being the cause of the whole situation. She and her company experimented on normal spiders and disposed of their corpses after the experiments (but I thought killing spiders was wrong?), but failed to do so properly and released one of the mutant spiders in the wild.
No, the specialist contractors they hired to dispose of the spiders cut corners and dumped them in the landfill. This is another thing, like the euthanasia method, that was specifically set up as a Chekhov's Gun in the scene in Jade's lab so that we'd remember it when it came up again at the climax.
Hmmm. I get your point, but I don't know if it's such a bad thing for the format and formula of the show to change.
Of course not. Change is what's allowed
Doctor Who to thrive for so long. But it's still retained its own distinctive character that was unlike other shows. It's not that I don't want DW to change, it's that I want it to change in a fresh and interesting way rather than feeling like a copy of other shows. I don't want episodes that make people say "That reminds me of
Star Trek" or "That reminds me of
Quantum Leap." I want episodes that make people say "That feels like
Doctor Who, but in a fascinatingly new way."
See, I don't know. While I think it's fair to follow your presumption, I don't think that's quite how the episode lays it out. Jade's rebuttal to Robertson isn't "Until I can solve the problem, or let's deal with it" but rather "Nope, killing them is bad, but locking them away is the humane thing." It's not an uncommon read of the scene either based on looking at the thread.
Yeah, but why does everyone keep assuming the plan was to let them suffocate? Robertson explicitly said that it was possible to survive in there for 6 months. And the spiders weren't nearly large enough to suffocate from their own weight like the queen. It seemed clear to me that the plan was just to contain them so that they could be dealt with later.
The solution the Doctor offers is to bait them into the secret room with Roberton's supply of food and that "fat bass" from Ryan's phone. There's no other talk of what to do once they're in there besides locking them away.
Yes, there is. See my first paragraph above.
Presumably they'll either grow and grow and grow and crush each other, or suffocate/starve after 6 months.
Why in the world would you presume that? It's not like the panic room was permanently sealed. They were able to unlock it the first time, so they could do it again. The panic room was just to contain them until Jade could deal with them properly, which would obviously take much less than 6 months. She's got this whole lab that specializes in spiders, that has experience with euthanizing them humanely and has the resources to do so, and the whole thing is partly her responsibility in the first place and thus she should be involved in cleaning it up. How does it make any sense at all to presume she'd just sit back and do absolutely nothing for 6 months after that door was locked? Especially when we knew from her dialogue that it was important to her to end spider lives humanely?
Folks using TV logic of quick and "painless" gun shots will certain have a hard time parsing it.
That's not Chibnall's fault, it's the fault of all the other writers who've used that misleading trope.