Thought I'd put this topic here, although if the mods feel it's more of a Sports and Fitness topic, feel free to move. 
There was a news item today about a row stemming from a comment made by Prince Edward:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8333204.stm
I can concur that the expedition side of the Award is the most challenging, and at times can be the riskiest to health and safety, which is why we had a lot of training in safety aspects of the expedition - both theory and practical experience - specific to the type of adventure we would go on.
Our expeditions always took us to the Grampian Mountains in Scotland, usually in the late spring and summer when the weather is most ideal. Yet we always had to learn the basics of hillwalking safety, including what to do in an emergency, basic first aid, calling for help, etc. (all this in the days before widespread mobile phone use of course - although acquiring a mobile signal in the middle of nowhere would probably be difficult at best) A minimum expedition team would consist of four boys and/or girls, and if for whatever reason the numbers fell to three or less, we would have to call off the whole trip as taking too small a group would be tricky should something go wrong and the team needed to get help.
Plus, before going off on an expedition, our parents had to sign a consent form to ensure that they too were aware of the risks of such an expedition.
We never had anyone seriously injured in our cohort of DoE participants, although we did have one chap in another year sustain a head injury after a fall, and during an early expedition another group almost fell down a steep slope down one side of a winding path. There were several moments where the occasion did threaten to (and on one or two occasions actually did) get the better of me, giving me, for the first time in my life, the feeling that I really could get seriously injured (or worse) in this wide world of ours.
They were great days. Since then, having settled down into a job (which in itself is another story altogether) I feel I've been too domesticated, less risky, really - and it shows, to be honest. However, I think the Award scheme has helped me become a better person overall, in terms of relationships, hobbies, experiences, and physical and mental wellbeing - I don't think I would have ever experienced such adventurous experiences otherwise, and would have just stuck to being a boring person doing little to nothing for most of my teenage years.
Anyway, anyone else do the Duke of Edinburgh's Award here, either in the UK or in other countries around the world? Do you think it helped you a lot in life?

There was a news item today about a row stemming from a comment made by Prince Edward:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8333204.stm
In terms of the Prince's comments, I think it was a bit much to attribute news of increased participation in the Award scheme to the fairly recent death of a participant. The expeditions and adventures are thrilling in themselves, and there is an element of risk to one's personal safety, but I wouldn't emphasise the perceived risk of death from taking part in the Award as a selling point, nor would I suggest that this was the sole reason to do the Award. Besides, that sort of talk only trivialises what was a tragic loss of life.Prince Edward has suggested the risk of death is part of the attraction of the Duke of Edinburgh award scheme for young people.
He made the comments during a trip to Australia after being asked about the death of a teenager on a hiking trip.
The prince did not comment on the case but said the award's element of serious danger - that "you could die doing this" - contributed to its popularity.
The scheme's organisers insisted it had an "exemplary safety record".
The Earl of Wessex was asked a question by The Australian newspaper about the death in 2006 of David Iredale from Sydney during a Duke of Edinburgh award scheme training camp.
The 17-year-old was walking in the Blue Mountains of New South Wales when he became lost, ran out of water and collapsed.
The prince said he did not know the details of the case, but it reminded him of the death of a British boy in the scheme's early years.
He said that, despite concern from the award's trustees about its future, the tragedy had actually boosted interest from the young.
"Suddenly the award, which was new...(its) reputation among young people was, 'Wow, this is serious. You could die doing this'.
"And the sense of adventure, the sense of excitement, that it gave you that sort of risk element - that's going back many years - but young people are like that, still that sense of adventure, the sense that it (death) is possible.
"Obviously we don't want that to happen. Certainly that's not the intention: we give them the skills to go out there and do it safely and constructively. It was just that psychology, about what makes young people tick," he said.
I can concur that the expedition side of the Award is the most challenging, and at times can be the riskiest to health and safety, which is why we had a lot of training in safety aspects of the expedition - both theory and practical experience - specific to the type of adventure we would go on.
Our expeditions always took us to the Grampian Mountains in Scotland, usually in the late spring and summer when the weather is most ideal. Yet we always had to learn the basics of hillwalking safety, including what to do in an emergency, basic first aid, calling for help, etc. (all this in the days before widespread mobile phone use of course - although acquiring a mobile signal in the middle of nowhere would probably be difficult at best) A minimum expedition team would consist of four boys and/or girls, and if for whatever reason the numbers fell to three or less, we would have to call off the whole trip as taking too small a group would be tricky should something go wrong and the team needed to get help.
Plus, before going off on an expedition, our parents had to sign a consent form to ensure that they too were aware of the risks of such an expedition.
We never had anyone seriously injured in our cohort of DoE participants, although we did have one chap in another year sustain a head injury after a fall, and during an early expedition another group almost fell down a steep slope down one side of a winding path. There were several moments where the occasion did threaten to (and on one or two occasions actually did) get the better of me, giving me, for the first time in my life, the feeling that I really could get seriously injured (or worse) in this wide world of ours.
They were great days. Since then, having settled down into a job (which in itself is another story altogether) I feel I've been too domesticated, less risky, really - and it shows, to be honest. However, I think the Award scheme has helped me become a better person overall, in terms of relationships, hobbies, experiences, and physical and mental wellbeing - I don't think I would have ever experienced such adventurous experiences otherwise, and would have just stuck to being a boring person doing little to nothing for most of my teenage years.
Anyway, anyone else do the Duke of Edinburgh's Award here, either in the UK or in other countries around the world? Do you think it helped you a lot in life?