I went to the cinema on opening day and I remember the very first scene where you hear the beeps and then the camers swings away from the hull off the USS Kelvin and you hear those transmissions to Starfleet. I knew then that this was gonna be good.
I gasped in shock when the woman got blasted into space and then musec faded to silence!
I was grasped with emotion as the situation became grim for the crew.
To me this was one of my all time openings to any star trek movie!
How anyone could not like such a powerful opening is beyond me!
I agree the execution in the movie as far as numerous scenes are concerned was top notch, but you also don't understand the complexities of human behavior if you say that it's 'beyond you' if anyone could not like 'such a powerful opening' and the fact that each individual react in their own way depending on the circumstances.
There are no universal rules.
There are established norms of society.
To simply condemn (or ridicule) everyone who don't react in the same way when someone dies (regardless of the type of situation/circumstances) is just playing it 'stupid' and not accepting people for who they are.
The scene was enjoyable yes, but it didn't invoke an emotional response from me.
Am I supposed to be condemned and burned on a stick for it?
Please.
You have as much right to your opinion as do they. People on here tend to take other's opinions as a personal affront. Don't let them get you down.I went to the cinema on opening day and I remember the very first scene where you hear the beeps and then the camers swings away from the hull off the USS Kelvin and you hear those transmissions to Starfleet. I knew then that this was gonna be good.
I gasped in shock when the woman got blasted into space and then musec faded to silence!
I was grasped with emotion as the situation became grim for the crew.
To me this was one of my all time openings to any star trek movie!
How anyone could not like such a powerful opening is beyond me!
I agree the execution in the movie as far as numerous scenes are concerned was top notch, but you also don't understand the complexities of human behavior if you say that it's 'beyond you' if anyone could not like 'such a powerful opening' and the fact that each individual react in their own way depending on the circumstances.
There are no universal rules.
There are established norms of society.
To simply condemn (or ridicule) everyone who don't react in the same way when someone dies (regardless of the type of situation/circumstances) is just playing it 'stupid' and not accepting people for who they are.
The scene was enjoyable yes, but it didn't invoke an emotional response from me.
Am I supposed to be condemned and burned on a stick for it?
Please.
In what way am i showing condemnation or anything else by giving my opinion that I can't understand why anone cannot like the opening? I was just giving my opinion. I can't understand it but who am I? I'm not suggesting that everyone should like it because I do, just that I can't believe that anyone deosn't. No offence was intended by my post and if anyone is offended then that is also "beyond me".
Yeah, what she said!I think we all need to lighten up a bit on this board.
It is bad because of the character assassination of James Kirk's mom compared to Roddenberry's vision for her.
As I have explained elsewhere, Roddenberry wanted her to have no last name and be a "New Human" who had many sexual partners, the first of which was named only James. It was for this love instructor that she named a son she happened to have with a particularly good lay named Kirk. As a New Human, she certainly would not have been a Starfleet officer.
Now Abrams has ruined the character, turning her into a competent Starfleet officer and the loving wife of her husband, George Kirk, yet another Starfleet officer. They went even further as to give her a last name, which no good New Human would ever have.
Kirk's mom should be as Roddenberry envisioned: into free love and telepathically linked to her fellow New Humans.
Ewww. This would take the "everyman" aspect away from Kirk and turn him into some sort of "hippie/commune" love child. No thanks.
What the hell was Roddenberry smoking when he thought of this odd background story for Kirk's parents?
It's an overstatement for me to say that I didn't like the opening scene, but I don't think it was anywhere near my favorite part of the movie. I thought the guy playing George Kirk was bad, and the dialogue as a whole felt clunky and awkward.
...
Not just a tear, a CRY. And everytime i listen to the soundtrack, when that piece is played i get a big old gooby teardrop in each eye.
I don't hate the opening but it doesn't move the earth for me like it does for others. to each their own / ke sera sera / vive la difference / it is what it is / etc. . .
Well I personally agree that the opening sequence was NOT as emotional or gripping as numerous people seem to claim.
It evoked 0 emotional response from me.
It was entertaining sure, but hardly 'spectacular' ... although I'm also pleased that the movie is doing well on all sides overall.
Didn't like the beginning at all. Found it hokey that the moment they face a terrifying destruction is the moment that Kirk's wife is deep in labour. Then, instead of giving the woman meds to stall her labour until the shuttle reached a safe distance, they actually insist she deliver right at that moment.Meanwhile, Kirk has the ability to pilot an entire spaceship by himself while discussing baby names with his wife?
Whatever....
Yeah me too. I got quite choked on all three viewings.It made me cry both times I watched it.
I loved it, personally.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.