I can't be the only one here.
Seems so great to be apart of something with such a rich fan base.
Then again, you have people like Beltran who say being on Trek was the worst time of their life.
But you also have people like Visitor who say that being on Trek was the best time of their life.
It depends on how the role is written and whether it is challenging enough for an actor, and can also be influenced by the working environment, chemistry with the other actors, by how much the actor connects to the role or likes the show in general, etc... just like in any other show. I don't see what's so special or different about Trek.
I'd love it, but that's because I'm not an actor.
I can understand though that an actor that's been around a while would not necessarily find Star Trek the most fulfilling work.
Sure the pay would be good, as many actors want a steady paycheck, but saying "Sensors non responsive sir," wouldn't be the highlight of an acting career.
That's if your role is to stand there and utter meaningless technobabble. On the other hand, you might get a very emotional, dramatic storyline, even if you're just a guest star who is to be killed at the end of the episode. Again, I don't see what differentiates Star Trek from any other franchise or TV show out there. Is standing there and saying "sensors not responsive, sir" any different than standing there and saying "The patient is in stable condition" or "The estimated time of death is 12 hours"?