Cuba and China currently as well as the defunct Soviet Union.
And at least two others: North Korea, and 'Democratic Kampuchea' (i.e. the Khmer Rouge).
Cuba and China currently as well as the defunct Soviet Union.
As for Bernie--I want to see what his position on NASA is. Mondale wanted to kill off NASA, and Proxmire--well, the less said about him the better.
I am supportive of NASA not only because of the excitement of space exploration, but because of all the additional side benefits we receive from research in that area. Sometimes, and frankly I don't remember all of those votes, one is put in a position of having to make very very difficult choices about whether you vote to provide food for hungry kids or health care for people who have none and other programs. But, in general, I do support increasing funding for NASA.
Sure, but will he get the nomination or will he run as an Independent?
Or, if he doesn't get the Democratic nomination, will he support the candidate who does?
I can't picture him running as an independent in the general election. Most of his support would come from people who would otherwise vote Democratic, which could contribute to a Republic win.
Sanders is on record (many times) as saying that if he does not get the Dem nomination he will not run as a third party candidate and that he will support whoever becomes the Dem nominee.
The rally in Los Angeles was INCREDIBLE!! Got so energized from seeing 27,000 people all cheering for his wonderful ideas. And now with him leading in New Hampshire, I feel he has a real shot at he presidency.
The rally in Los Angeles was INCREDIBLE!! Got so energized from seeing 27,000 people all cheering for his wonderful ideas. And now with him leading in New Hampshire, I feel he has a real shot at he presidency.
That's really, really great! Glad it turned out as well as it did.
I disagree with the notion that there is no left-populist potential in "red states". Actually in rural areas with a higher worker density the potential is actually higher. The problem is that the New, i.e. post 68, Left plays this "we educated upper middle class vs. you unwashed dumb underclass scum" game and then is surprised that the working class listens to right-wing populists. The Old Left had no problem alligning the middle class intelligentsia with the working class.I love that he's not afraid of going right into the heart of red states with his message
I disagree with the notion that there is no left-populist potential in "red states". Actually in rural areas with a higher worker density the potential is actually higher. The problem is that the New, i.e. post 68, Left plays this "we educated upper middle class vs. you unwashed dumb underclass scum" game and then is surprised that the working class listens to right-wing populists. The Old Left had no problem alligning the middle class intelligentsia with the working class.I love that he's not afraid of going right into the heart of red states with his message
"What's the Matter with Kansas?" is a good book on the subject.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.