• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Another Pic Surfaces of Khan's Baby from TWOK

Yes, but if I recall correctly, Sackett's accounts contradict the idea that Roddenberry got in trouble with the SEG over the use of fans.

My understanding is that he didn't get into trouble, but the SEG simply moved to close the loophole he'd found in their regulations. The point was the SEG really couldn't fill the required number of pre-made costumes with the required number of correct-height/weight professional extras. Some of the fans used were already SEG members anyway.

GR was great at finding loopholes and ways around the rules. He was the first Trek Troll. :lol:
 
Yes, but if I recall correctly, Sackett's accounts contradict the idea that Roddenberry got in trouble with the SEG over the use of fans.

My understanding is that he didn't get into trouble...
That was my point. I was trying to find any reference to the SEG rules of the time. Thanks. :)

I have the Making of TMP book here, but I'm having a hard time finding any reference to the Rec Dec and extras, as the book has no index.
You won't find a reference to GR getting into trouble from the SEG in that book because it's the official Paramount-approved account. The lawyers have already gone through its manuscript. To admit the production broke rules in print would be opening up the possibility of litigation or industrial action.
Then I'm perplexed as to why you cited the book as below. Or am I missing something else you were pointing me to in said volume?
Therin of Andor said:
I really would like a source on these claims as I've heard actors tell these things, but I've yet to see them substantiated.
"The Making of Star Trek: The Motion Picture" by Susan Sackett (Pocket 1980), also Susan Sackett's monthly "Starlog" column, and "On the Good Ship Enterprise" (Donning) by Bjo Trimble.
 
The 'mister' Saavik stuff supposedly comes from Coast Guard parlance?

Hmmmm, intriguing.
 
Holy cow. Thought I knew every angle. For a moment, the idea of Kirk raising Khan's surviving child flashed through my mind, but nah. Glad they cut that scene out. Oy! -- RR
 
'm perplexed as to why you cited the book

When you said, "I really would like a source..." it seemed like you were saying there wasn't anything in print whatsoever re getting the fans in as extras, and I rattled off two books I knew mentioned the event in some detail. Sorry. I wasn't saying those two books actually backed up the theory you'd heard.
 
'm perplexed as to why you cited the book

When you said, "I really would like a source..." it seemed like you were saying there wasn't anything in print whatsoever re getting the fans in as extras, and I rattled off two books I knew mentioned the event in some detail. Sorry. I wasn't saying those two books actually backed up the theory you'd heard.
Thanks for clarifying...I'm still unable to find reference to the RecDeck at all in The Making of book...but that's most likely because it's just something I am missing when skimming through it.
 
I'm still unable to find reference to the RecDeck at all in The Making of book...but that's most likely because it's just something I am missing when skimming through it.

Aha! It was Susan Sackett's "Starlog" column that covered the fan extras' casting call (in issue #20, p 22).

Also Bjo Trimble's "On the Good Ship Enterprise" (Donning, 1982) and Walter Koenig's "Chekov's Enterprise" (Pocket, 1980), both of which mention partial lists of the fans who made up the successful group of about 170 (of over 350 hopefuls).

A very early article by Dennis Fischer (later a regular "Cinefantastique" reviewer) was featured in "Enterprise Incidents" (#7, Nov 1979, pp 4-8) and called "Part of the magic: the experience of being a Star Trek extra". Dennis's article was written only days after the filming of the scene, and before any official publicity material about the TMP aliens had even been released. It has the best list of fan participants, with a lot of information on who's who, and where to find some of them in the scene.

http://therinofandor.blogspot.com/2007/08/faces-in-crowd-ive-wanted-to-do-this.html

I guess if you want information on any ruling that was made after the fact, you could write to the current version of the Screen Extras Guild?
 
Oh, no. I was more challenging those who claim Roddenberry "got in trouble" for using fans as extras to cite evidence, because all the sources I had seen referred to the rules and loopholes in the number of paid SEG extras you were required to have.
 
Whereas I don't actually give a shit. ;)

I want to say, DS9Saga, that the ref to the SEG coming down on Roddenberry was in either Joel Engel's biography or James Van Hise's biography of Roddenberry. (The unique thing about Van Hise's biography is that it covers, at laborious length, Roddenberry's near-pornographic Tarzan script. Engel and David Alexander stay the hell away from that.) But since I don't have access to either book right now, I can't check.
 
That is ONE CREEPY subplot I'm glad Nick Meyer had cut out. I realize 18 years on a planet with Marla McGivers would lead to a lot of intimacy and possible pregnancy, but such a thing would never have felt right in the context of the Khan story. Not one like TWOK.
 
From the actual released film itself, you'd think Joachim was Khan's baby.:lol:
 
Damn, that is a disturbing picture. I'm glad they cut it out.

Yeah, having an "innocent" baby blown up on the Reliant by the Genesis explosion would just be wrong and too much of a distraction in the movie. It woulda derailed it, I think. Khan going down is one thing, but having a baby die is another.
 
In an early draft of the script, Kirk secretly beamed the child off the Reliant and had him raised to adulthood by friends in South Carolina:







untitled-8.jpg


Joe, noted Trek historian
 
That is ONE CREEPY subplot I'm glad Nick Meyer had cut out. I realize 18 years on a planet with Marla McGivers would lead to a lot of intimacy and possible pregnancy, but such a thing would never have felt right in the context of the Khan story. Not one like TWOK.

Why? Kahn lost his family in his race for vengeance, sacrificing everything in his quest to get Kirk. Where as Kirk found his family, friends, and the meaning to his life because of Kahn.

"It's the best of times, it's the worst of times." Kahn's own attempts to "kill kirk" give kirk his life back.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top