• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Animated series episodes

Well, these are little fan-made episodes. Dan has done three of them so far: "The Element ofSurprise" (8 minutes), "And Let the Heavens Fall" (30 minutes), and "Ptolemy Wept" (60 minutes).

Mod could move this thread to Fan Productions.
 
Sorry if this is a little off topic but...is the old animated series any good?

I'm not big on animated shows (I don't look down on them, just not my thing) but I occasionally will get talked into something and like it. I love Star Trek but I always avoid the animated series. Worth watching? Like the show?
 
I'm not big on animated shows (I don't look down on them, just not my thing) but I occasionally will get talked into something and like it. I love Star Trek but I always avoid the animated series. Worth watching? Like the show?

Well, it takes a lot of patience with the limited budget and techniques they had to work with at the time. I'm quite fond of it, but I grew up with it. The animation is limited and the performances from Shatner, Nimoy, and Kelley tend to be pretty flat. But it is as faithful a continuation of TOS as they could make it, with the whole main cast returning except Walter Koenig (who did write an episode), and with half of its episodes written by veterans of the original show. D.C. Fontana was the story editor for most of it, and she strove to tell stories on an equally sophisticated level to TOS, albeit with less sex and violence and with much more freedom to show exotic aliens and settings and tell stories too expensive to shoot in live action. If you can look past the production limitations and focus on the stories, you may enjoy it. It has a lot of mediocre episodes, but there are some classics there, notably D.C. Fontana's "Yesteryear."

If nothing else, it's a part of Star Trek history that deserves to be acknowledged, the one followup to TOS that had the most creators, actors, plots, and settings in common with the original show. It brings back Sarek, Harry Mudd, and Cyrano Jones (with the same actors) as well as Amanda, Kor, Koloth, and Bob Wesley (without the actors). It's the debut of Robert April as the first captain of the Enterprise (rather than just a rejected name for Pike) and has the only onscreen mention of McCoy's daughter.
 
Well, it takes a lot of patience with the limited budget and techniques they had to work with at the time. I'm quite fond of it, but I grew up with it. The animation is limited and the performances from Shatner, Nimoy, and Kelley tend to be pretty flat. But it is as faithful a continuation of TOS as they could make it, with the whole main cast returning except Walter Koenig (who did write an episode), and with half of its episodes written by veterans of the original show. D.C. Fontana was the story editor for most of it, and she strove to tell stories on an equally sophisticated level to TOS, albeit with less sex and violence and with much more freedom to show exotic aliens and settings and tell stories too expensive to shoot in live action. If you can look past the production limitations and focus on the stories, you may enjoy it. It has a lot of mediocre episodes, but there are some classics there, notably D.C. Fontana's "Yesteryear."

If nothing else, it's a part of Star Trek history that deserves to be acknowledged, the one followup to TOS that had the most creators, actors, plots, and settings in common with the original show. It brings back Sarek, Harry Mudd, and Cyrano Jones (with the same actors) as well as Amanda, Kor, Koloth, and Bob Wesley (without the actors). It's the debut of Robert April as the first captain of the Enterprise (rather than just a rejected name for Pike) and has the only onscreen mention of McCoy's daughter.

Thanks! That was increadibly helpful!
 
Well, it takes a lot of patience with the limited budget and techniques they had to work with at the time. I'm quite fond of it, but I grew up with it. The animation is limited and the performances from Shatner, Nimoy, and Kelley tend to be pretty flat. But it is as faithful a continuation of TOS as they could make it, with the whole main cast returning except Walter Koenig (who did write an episode), and with half of its episodes written by veterans of the original show. D.C. Fontana was the story editor for most of it, and she strove to tell stories on an equally sophisticated level to TOS, albeit with less sex and violence and with much more freedom to show exotic aliens and settings and tell stories too expensive to shoot in live action. If you can look past the production limitations and focus on the stories, you may enjoy it. It has a lot of mediocre episodes, but there are some classics there, notably D.C. Fontana's "Yesteryear."

If nothing else, it's a part of Star Trek history that deserves to be acknowledged, the one followup to TOS that had the most creators, actors, plots, and settings in common with the original show. It brings back Sarek, Harry Mudd, and Cyrano Jones (with the same actors) as well as Amanda, Kor, Koloth, and Bob Wesley (without the actors). It's the debut of Robert April as the first captain of the Enterprise (rather than just a rejected name for Pike) and has the only onscreen mention of McCoy's daughter.
Agree, Christopher is correct about TAS. TAS continues the five year mission began on TOS.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top