I guess Illyria is okay. I'm relieved that she didn't end up just being the season's 'big bad' like a second Jasmine as I was initially anticipating. I appreciate the unique direction the writers took the character making her not just one of those evil God-like beings, but one that has fallen from grace in a way, with the same megalomaniac ambition and ego such villains tend to have, but lacking the knowledge and resources to achieve the goals it demands. She sort of reminds me of Anya in a way, specifically when Anya first lost her powers and would say stuff like,
"When I get my powers back, you will all kneel before me!", arousing only apathy and amusement from those around her.
I also like Illyria's superiority complex about humans. It reminds me of '90s animated villains Darkseid from
"Superman" and Apocalypse from
"X-Men" who used to make me laugh with all their constant statements about how puny and pathetic humans are compared to them. Illyria calling the humans stuff like moss, apes, ants, etc. is pretty funny. So I can find a few things to admire about the character and I agree that it has really allowed Amy Acker to show her range as an actress, but I still have difficulty totally embracing it. On an objective level I recognize its merits, but I can't get involved in its arc emotionally, as I guess we're supposed to since we see how troubled she is. It's hard to find her a sympathetic character when I just miss Fred, and looking at her just reminds me how much I'd rather be following Fred's emotional journey rather than hers. Overall, to me she still feels like a disappointing replacement for Fred.
What's weird about the last half of season 5 (and I blame Illyria partially for this) is how aimless it feels. I'm not getting the excitingly foreboding vibe I got in the better early seasons where everything seemed to be building to some huge climax at the end. In previous seasons, I knew what the show was building towards, so I'd just get anxious to see
how they resolve it. For example, showdowns with Holtz, the Pyleans, or Darla.
This time, I can't even guess what the big conflict will be at the end, since there's no clear single antagonist (the senior partners are hinted at, but have never been seen). Lindsey was brought back, but he doesn't seem to be as potentially dangerous as used to be either. They're hinting at Angel going all immoral again as he agrees to sacrifice a baby to some demons, but this twist doesn't have the freshness or impact of the similar twist in an earlier season where Angel fired his staff and started being all self-destructive and isolated.
While I'm grateful to the writers for not taking the predictable route of making the whole season lead to a showdown with Illyria, I also feel like all the time spent figuring what to do with her might have been better spent building towards a showdown with
someone. There has been mention of an apocalypse, but that doesn't feel as ominous as it should. I'm not sure why. It might be because I'm a little burned out on apocalypses after how many times
"Buffy the Vampire Slayer" did them.
There are only three episodes left and I'm not feeling as primed for some killer finale as I did towards the end of previous seasons (except season 4, where the arc bored me to that point where I just wanted everything to be over with fast). Maybe it's better that I'm so unsure of where this show is going. Perhaps I'll be surprised and blown away at the end, but since people say
"The Girl In Question" is a more light-hearted episode, I'm assuming that means there are only two episodes to tie up all the loose ends in a serious dramatic fashion? This is a lot of work for two episodes to do. I hope the writers were up to it. I'll find out soon enough. I just have to get through the (infamous?)
"The Girl In Question" and then
shit gets real, right?
