This is turning out to be one of the flat-out awesomest things to hit this forum in a long time.
I need to try something like this someday. My colouring always looks far too clean to me.Feelin' Retro ...
![]()
JM.
I'm very glad to hear that from you, Vektor. And I have to agree, the quality of the entries so far is beyond everything I would have expected. This is turning out much better than I thought.I gotta say, though, when this idea was first proposed I thought it sounded like one of those sorta cool ideas that would never go anywhere. Boy was I wrong! This is turning out to be one of the flat-out awesomest things to hit this forum in a long time.
Thanks, Thomas. That's very nice of you.Here here! Props to NCC-1701 for getting the ball rolling!
Oh, come on, they can't be too bad. I think your name looks good on the list ...I gave very brief consideration to joining in myself. I did a test with pencil and paper this morning.
The results were not good.
I actually tried to 'young him down' a bit - the lighting highlighted some areas where I had him looking too old, but, yeah, it's mostly the harsh lighting. I'll look at cleaning up his eyes, tooPtrope, have you tweaked your McCoy? On your webpage, he comes over like his ten year younger brother, here he looks like he is with one foot in the grave (or is that just the different resolution/lighting?). I'd say get his eyes a little less blood-shot and you have basically settled him.
I like the way Spock looks, but I don't think I did a very good job on making him look like Leonard Nimoy - I didn't really have a lot of time to spend on the morph, and I'll be going back to fix it.Spock on the other hand shows how Vulcans age slower than humans. (It is strange how there are several quite good likenesses of Spock around, but I have yet to see some Kirk alter-ego that is halfway passable, although he actually his appearance changes the most between the end of TOS and TMP.)
You and me both!I can't wait to see something tangible coming from that TAS re-animated project, even a small scene i.e. on the bridge as proof of concept.
Oh, come on, they can't be too bad. I think your name looks good on the list ...I gave very brief consideration to joining in myself. I did a test with pencil and paper this morning.
The results were not good.
[01.] NCC-1701
[02.] ThomastheCat
[03.] Ptrope
[04.] PlanetMudd
[05.] Vektor
[06.] Redfern
[07.] Masao
[08.] Venardhi
[09.] Starscape
[10.] jon1701
Does that mean I have convinced you? If so, cool!Ok, that will give me something to learn...again.
Whats the timescale - how long do we get each time?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.