• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

America's Attack on the Lemonade Stand

Status
Not open for further replies.
What right did they have to have a military base in another countries territory, none at all is the answer, by that logic Britain should of kept a military base after the revolutionary war on American soil...

I latched onto this bit, just to prove how wrong and misinformed you are. By your statement, you are saying that Ft. Sumter and all the other Union forts were built in the Confederacy AFTER they seceded. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fort_Sumter

To sum it up: Fort Sumter was built following the War of 1812, as one of a series of fortifications on the southern U.S. coast. Construction began in 1827, and the structure was still unfinished in 1861, when the Civil War began.


I never claimed they were built after, I claimed they instigated the war by refusing to leave what was now property of the Confederacy, the fort belonged to the Confederacy, not the Union, the Union refused to leave it.
 
What right did they have to have a military base in another countries territory, none at all is the answer, by that logic Britain should of kept a military base after the revolutionary war on American soil...

I latched onto this bit, just to prove how wrong and misinformed you are. By your statement, you are saying that Ft. Sumter and all the other Union forts were built in the Confederacy AFTER they seceded. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fort_Sumter

To sum it up: Fort Sumter was built following the War of 1812, as one of a series of fortifications on the southern U.S. coast. Construction began in 1827, and the structure was still unfinished in 1861, when the Civil War began.
Lincoln had a time machine, watch Aqua Teen Hunger Force.

And a rocket capable of a moon launch! Take THAT, Kennedy!
 
Don't you know the true powers of FEMA? They can take over the government.

During a holiday, the President will declare an emergency and grant them emergency federal powers. Citizens will be herded into camps and the invasion will begin.

This happens December 21st, 2012.

I was talking to this guy smoking a ciggie the other day and he told me the date was set.

Did he tell you the time that it would happen?

Always the date never the time.
 
What right did they have to have a military base in another countries territory, none at all is the answer, by that logic Britain should of kept a military base after the revolutionary war on American soil...

I latched onto this bit, just to prove how wrong and misinformed you are. By your statement, you are saying that Ft. Sumter and all the other Union forts were built in the Confederacy AFTER they seceded. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fort_Sumter

To sum it up: Fort Sumter was built following the War of 1812, as one of a series of fortifications on the southern U.S. coast. Construction began in 1827, and the structure was still unfinished in 1861, when the Civil War began.


I never claimed they were built after, I claimed they instigated the war by refusing to leave what was now property of the Confederacy, the fort belonged to the Confederacy, not the Union, the Union refused to leave it.

No it didn't. Fort Sumter was property of the US Federal government, and the Confederacy that attacked it was in open rebellion. The Union army refused to leave it because it was their property. It didn't become Confederate property until after the Union garrison surrendered.
 
Don't you know the true powers of FEMA? They can take over the government.

During a holiday, the President will declare an emergency and grant them emergency federal powers. Citizens will be herded into camps and the invasion will begin.

This happens December 21st, 2012.

I was talking to this guy smoking a ciggie the other day and he told me the date was set.

Did he tell you the time that it would happen?

Always the date never the time.
Trust no one.
 
I latched onto this bit, just to prove how wrong and misinformed you are. By your statement, you are saying that Ft. Sumter and all the other Union forts were built in the Confederacy AFTER they seceded. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fort_Sumter

To sum it up: Fort Sumter was built following the War of 1812, as one of a series of fortifications on the southern U.S. coast. Construction began in 1827, and the structure was still unfinished in 1861, when the Civil War began.


I never claimed they were built after, I claimed they instigated the war by refusing to leave what was now property of the Confederacy, the fort belonged to the Confederacy, not the Union, the Union refused to leave it.

No it didn't. Fort Sumter was property of the US Federal government, and the Confederacy that attacked it was in open rebellion. The Union army refused to leave it because it was their property.

If your lease is up on your apartment, you have to leave, the feds lease was up...they had to be evicted.
 
I suppose in good conscience I should withdraw my suggestion to Ninjacore that she check out TNZ. She couldn't make it for five minutes there with this kind of stuff. Not fair to her.
 
I never claimed they were built after, I claimed they instigated the war by refusing to leave what was now property of the Confederacy, the fort belonged to the Confederacy, not the Union, the Union refused to leave it.

No it didn't. Fort Sumter was property of the US Federal government, and the Confederacy that attacked it was in open rebellion. The Union army refused to leave it because it was their property.

If your lease is up on your apartment, you have to leave, the feds lease was up...they had to be evicted.

The US government was not leasing that land from the CSA, but nice try. You don't have to have a lease for your own property, after all.
 
I never claimed they were built after, I claimed they instigated the war by refusing to leave what was now property of the Confederacy, the fort belonged to the Confederacy, not the Union, the Union refused to leave it.

No it didn't. Fort Sumter was property of the US Federal government, and the Confederacy that attacked it was in open rebellion. The Union army refused to leave it because it was their property.

If your lease is up on your apartment, you have to leave, the feds lease was up...they had to be evicted.

That's a terrible metaphor. EDIT: What Robert Maxwell said above me. The Confederacy attacked the fort. That we can agree on. Can we also agree upon the fact that the Confederacy started the war?
 
No it didn't. Fort Sumter was property of the US Federal government, and the Confederacy that attacked it was in open rebellion. The Union army refused to leave it because it was their property.

If your lease is up on your apartment, you have to leave, the feds lease was up...they had to be evicted.

The US government was not leasing that land from the CSA, but nice try. You don't have to have a lease for your own property, after all.


The federal government lost rights to that land when the state it was on seceded...duh...
 
No it didn't. Fort Sumter was property of the US Federal government, and the Confederacy that attacked it was in open rebellion. The Union army refused to leave it because it was their property.

If your lease is up on your apartment, you have to leave, the feds lease was up...they had to be evicted.

The US government was not leasing that land from the CSA, but nice try. You don't have to have a lease for your own property, after all.

I'm coming over to your apartment tomorrow and moving into the kitchen. Take all your stuff out of it or I'll destroy it. Ninjacore logic rules!
 
If your lease is up on your apartment, you have to leave, the feds lease was up...they had to be evicted.

The US government was not leasing that land from the CSA, but nice try. You don't have to have a lease for your own property, after all.


The federal government lost rights to that land when the state it was on seceded...duh...

Ah, so the CSA was within its legal rights to simply snatch land away from the Union government? Sounds like larceny to me.
 
If your lease is up on your apartment, you have to leave, the feds lease was up...they had to be evicted.

The US government was not leasing that land from the CSA, but nice try. You don't have to have a lease for your own property, after all.

I'm coming over to your apartment tomorrow and moving into the kitchen. Take all your stuff out of it or I'll destroy it. Ninjacore logic rules!


No, the south wanted to leave with their own states, not steal northern states, so not a valid comparison at all, and I live with my dad, in his house...not an apartment...
 
If your lease is up on your apartment, you have to leave, the feds lease was up...they had to be evicted.

The US government was not leasing that land from the CSA, but nice try. You don't have to have a lease for your own property, after all.


The federal government lost rights to that land when the state it was on seceded...duh...

No it didn't. The only way for that to have happened is if the Union legally recognized the independence of the Confederacy; they did not ever do that. So in the eyes of the Union, the Confederacy was a part of the Union, albeit one that was in open rebellion.
 
The US government was not leasing that land from the CSA, but nice try. You don't have to have a lease for your own property, after all.


The federal government lost rights to that land when the state it was on seceded...duh...

Ah, so the CSA was within its legal rights to simply snatch land away from the Union government? Sounds like larceny to me.

the land was the states, not the feds...
 
No, the south wanted to leave with their own states, not steal northern states, so not a valid comparison at all...

Who said that "the south" owned that land?

Define "the south." It's not like there was a referendum that permitted every southerner to vote democratically on whether to leave the Union or not, was there?

So you mean the governments of each state?

How representative were those governments? Who voted for them? Who was allowed to vote in each state?

Did the governments of those states hold legal title to the land in those states? Did they do so under the same principles of law that permitted them to own, buy and sell other human beings and hold them captive?

Frankly, I doubt that you know enough about anything to even know which if any of those questions make sense, much less what the answers might be. :lol:
 
No, the south wanted to leave with their own states, not steal northern states, so not a valid comparison at all, and I live with my dad, in his house...not an apartment...

I was talking about RoMax's kitchen not yours. I would never move to the South.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top