• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Am I the only one wanting a reboot that is a harder sci fi?

A great deal of the "science" in Trek is nonsensical (and inconsistent), which by definition excludes it from the hard SF genre.

Kor
 
A hard scifi trek would have warp ring ships, a much less inhabited universe, and probably focus more on future Earth and local bubble politics than grander stuff.

It's not that such is bad. Or even unwanted. But to call it 'Star Trek' would be hard. The first race humanity deals with are the Vulcans, who are, for all intents and purposes, Space Elves. The Kzinti United Earth fights are big violent misogynistic cats. So on and so on.

It'll be better for a new series to come about that competes with both Trek and the Orville and the Expanse. Something where somehow, FTL is possible, by the obvious Alcubierre drive, and doesn't violate causality (good bye, time travel plots, and honestly, good riddance) and so on.
 
The Expanse is not a casual watch. It takes me a couple of episodes to get back into it when a new season rolls around. But once it gets going, I'm re-hooked and flip to full binge watch mode.
 
Not sure if a "harder sci-fi" reboot of Trek is possible. The franchise is too far along with its portrayal of "science" and "technology" that rebooting with a more real-world plausible science would remove too many of the elements that make it Star Trek.

Now you could have a drama show set entirely on a planet with minimal use of sci-tech and the focus being more on the characters (eg. Starfleet JAG), but i'm not sure CBS sees an audience for something like this as of now and the next few years.
 
But how can show everyone I'm intellectually superior, then? ;)

Why? It's easy: all you have to do is endlessly point out things that everybody already knows (like that alien species wouldn't be able to inter-breed in real life, or that it's unlikely that there would be so many humanoids around) and by calling everything that doesn't fit your high standards of rock-hard scifi "Science Fantasy" instead ;)
 
No thanks,

I also don't get why so many people hold "Hard" SciFi as such an ideal. There's nothing wrong with soft scifi.

Indeed not, but I think specifically with Star Trek it has this veneer of false hardness because it makes such extensive use of scientific terminology and concepts. I think that is why so many in Star Trek fandom are obsessed with "hardness". I doubt people in the Star Wars or Babylon 5 fandoms feel the same way, precisely because those franchises don't make a point of pretending to be harder than they are.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top