• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

After watching STIII:TSFS, Ent Vulcans make sense.

Re: After watching STIII:TSFS, Ent Vulcans make se

Sarek had a good reason for his actions, and his more emotional demeanor.

Priestess: "Your request is not logical!"

Sarek: "My logic faulters where my son is concerned."


Sarek was under duress at the time, as his son had just died and his spirit was thought to be lost. Soval and co. have not come up with such excuses for thier behaviour.

I like that they are taking risks with the Vulcan's... I just wish they would be more careful about it. Thus far, it has been pretty hit and miss.
 
Posted by Robotrix_Zero:
Writers, actors and/or directors who don't really know about the old series have heard vaguely that Vulcan = Emotionless...and then they all end up being played as one-dimentional and (IMHO) boring.

And the ones who should be watching out for stuff like this (B&B) don't care.

I don't know that they don't care, really.

I think they're suffering fom the same malady as some of the others you just mentioned. They've never internalized the multi-layered nature of the Vulcan people, so when they try to go for the different facets--which they are, to their credit--they do it rather ham-handedly.

What the folks on ENT do get is that Vulcans are a diverse people. Some of them are more aggressive than others, and some have vey different viewpoints than Spock, or Sarek, or Tuvok.

As for "Trek III", Sarek may not have shouted the lines to Kirk, but he certainly spoke them with intensity and emotion, and he did, slightly, raise his voice. Soval is more voluble than Sarek, but he is indeed a different person, in a different situation, at a different time.

I also don't see the Vulcans as warlike in "Enterprise". But I do think that, having adopted the role of local hegemon in that area of space, they are very quick to take action against forces which would disturb their perception of order. Is that all that different from the Vulcans of later in Trek history? I don't think so. Let us recall Spock's line in "Journey to Babel":

"If he had a reason, my father is quite capable of killing, logically and efficiently."

Again, that is consistent with the Vulcans of "Enterprise", who have--by nature of the circumstances in which they find themselves--a reason to act decisively, and sometimes aggressively.

No, I don't really think the portrayals are significantly different at all. The peeks into mainline Vulcan culture are a bit different, but OTOH, they're also a lot deeper than has generally been done in the past, so there are bound to be some surprises as they bump up against our preconceptions.

Best,
Alex
 
Posted by Timofnine:
I just re-watched Star Trek III, and after seeing Sareks behaviour in this movie you can see that he is acting almost exactly like the Vulcan's as depicted in Enterprise.

He is logical - yet still traces of emotion manage to get through.

Before the mind meld with Kirk, we see anger (through a slightly raised voice) and despair - Sarek speaks just like Soval would in a 'heated' conversation.

I think that people's opinion's of Vulcan's being totaly flat toned in expression comes from Voyager and TPTB's depiction of Tuvok. But what people need to remember is that Tuvok had an individual personality and his species should not be stereotyped by his behaviour. - I'm sure that there are many different extremes in Vulcan behaviour, and the Vulcan's that we see on screen prove this. If we can have extreme's in other races - why not Vulcan's?

Think of the depiction of Vulcan's in that quite forgetteble DS9 episode where a Vulcan crew is playing baseball against the stations crew. The Vulcan's believe that they are superior to human's and even they show some emotion through their cool exterior (Hardcore DS9 fan's would never admit this though!)

It seem's like that Enterprises Vulcan's are being bashed just for the sake of bashing - they are depicted more unconventionaly then usual but why is this a bad thing? Their species is just being fleshed out more and we are meeting more of them - each one an individual with a different personality.

Another thing to consider is that prehaps not all Vulcan's reach Kolinar (the time when all emotion is shed) - prehaps Vulcan's who do not achieve this are always slightly more emotional in their mannerisms.

As for the mind meld issues brought up by the show recently - could Saavik meld? Could Valeris? Why is it so hard to believe that it is only a minority that can meld? Before Enterprise we had only seen a handfull of Vulcan's perform this act, OK they happened to be the main characters but we still only saw a minority of the Vulcan's that we have seen actually meld.

I think that it will be a very interesting arc seeing how the Vulcan's slowly learn to accept something that goes against the very core of their Logic - at the time melds could be seen as very 'emotional' and intimate - two things that the Vulcan's reject. Why would they want to embrace this act with open arms?

I think that the main problem that B&B are facing is a backlash from fan's not because they have ruined continuity - but because they have ruined fan's preconception's, stereotypes and fan-fiction.

bllassspherrrmmyyy :p :p

nice post
 
Timofnine, can I use that last sentence in your original post in my sig? It sums up my thoughts exactly.
 
I think it is interesting to realize the diversity among "logical" Vulcans.

To contrast this, one of the most interesting things about Worf's character was his sense of honor. His Klingon-ness was so much a part of him and his sense of honor was so noble. But when you saw other Klingons it was evident that he was more like an exception to the rule as so many of them behaved dishonorably (Dax said as much in Season 7 of DS9).

Maybe Spock was like Worf. Growing up as half human he had to continually prove his Vulcan-ness, like Worf had to seek out his own identity, so he compensated by becoming even more logical than most Vulcans. And so, T'Pol is more like most Vulcans. Striving to repress all her emotions but unconsciously allowing them to influence her actions.

Hmm.
 
Rothschild sez:
Timofnine, can I use that last sentence in your original post in my sig? It sums up my thoughts exactly.

You might clean up the overuse of the apostrophe first, though. However much I agree with Timofnine's post, it is illogical to use the apostrophe for plural nouns.
 
Posted by Rothschild:
Timofnine, can I use that last sentence in your original post in my sig? It sums up my thoughts exactly.

Yes of course, I haven't quite got around to copyrighting it yet! :lol:

Posted by Raz
Whaaaatttt??? He DID NOT shout those lines. Not at all. I strongly disagree with any assertion that he in any way shouted those lines. Good god.

LOL OK, so he didn't quite shout! But he did raise his voice and still showed alot of emotion through this.


Posted by Dudley
How could someone be made to think that the men responsible for Voyager could possibly do Star Trek right when they're in the driver's seat?

Because some people, myself included, do believe that they got somethings right in Voyager and the series is not as bad as alot of people on this board like to make out. B&B are learning from their past mistakes and triumph's on both Voyager and Enterprise, building on them to try and make future Star Trek better and more accepted by the hardcore aswell as the mainstream. You can not say that they are not trying! :cool:

Here is a slightly off topic yet interesting point that I noticed regarding complaints with T'Pol's 'Vulcan' attire - We often hear people complaining that Vulcan's do not wear catsuits like T'Pol does, but last night I watched the DS9 episodes Vortex and Captive Pursuit?(The one where Nog and Jake eye up the Vulcan women) and in each episode the Vulcan women were shown in a skin hugging catsuit! :p
 
Posted by Timofnine:
I think that the main problem that B&B are facing is a backlash from fan's not because they have ruined continuity - but because they have ruined fan's preconception's, stereotypes and fan-fiction.

Well, that's certainly one reason for it.

Frankly, the "Enterprise" Vulcans make perfect sense to me after seeing "Amok Time", an episode packed full of arrogant, deceitful and emotional Vulcans that I wouldn't trust in a dark alley. :lol:
 
Hear, hear!!

All very good points! And Star trek has always been about bringing down the stereotype ;)

More people need to read this and really think about how things are.
 
Posted by Timofnine:
I just re-watched Star Trek III, and after seeing Sareks behaviour in this movie you can see that he is acting almost exactly like the Vulcan's as depicted in Enterprise.

He is logical - yet still traces of emotion manage to get through.

Before the mind meld with Kirk, we see anger (through a slightly raised voice) and despair - Sarek speaks just like Soval would in a 'heated' conversation.

I think that people's opinion's of Vulcan's being totaly flat toned in expression comes from Voyager and TPTB's depiction of Tuvok. But what people need to remember is that Tuvok had an individual personality and his species should not be stereotyped by his behaviour. - I'm sure that there are many different extremes in Vulcan behaviour, and the Vulcan's that we see on screen prove this. If we can have extreme's in other races - why not Vulcan's?

Think of the depiction of Vulcan's in that quite forgetteble DS9 episode where a Vulcan crew is playing baseball against the stations crew. The Vulcan's believe that they are superior to human's and even they show some emotion through their cool exterior (Hardcore DS9 fan's would never admit this though!)

It seem's like that Enterprises Vulcan's are being bashed just for the sake of bashing - they are depicted more unconventionaly then usual but why is this a bad thing? Their species is just being fleshed out more and we are meeting more of them - each one an individual with a different personality.

Another thing to consider is that prehaps not all Vulcan's reach Kolinar (the time when all emotion is shed) - prehaps Vulcan's who do not achieve this are always slightly more emotional in their mannerisms.

As for the mind meld issues brought up by the show recently - could Saavik meld? Could Valeris? Why is it so hard to believe that it is only a minority that can meld? Before Enterprise we had only seen a handfull of Vulcan's perform this act, OK they happened to be the main characters but we still only saw a minority of the Vulcan's that we have seen actually meld.

I think that it will be a very interesting arc seeing how the Vulcan's slowly learn to accept something that goes against the very core of their Logic - at the time melds could be seen as very 'emotional' and intimate - two things that the Vulcan's reject. Why would they want to embrace this act with open arms?

I think that the main problem that B&B are facing is a backlash from fan's not because they have ruined continuity - but because they have ruined fan's preconception's, stereotypes and fan-fiction.

The actor who played Tuvok based his characterisation on what he grew up with, watching Leonard on TOS. He was aiming to imiatate the only example he had.

It was a good attempt.

Star Trek lore has NEVER implied that all Vulcans go thru Kohlinar training.

It's never been implied they all supress their emotions very well or are always "good people".

Stonn and T'Pring are examples, as is the apparently customary expression "I beg forgiveness", something said when there IS an emotional slip.

As for melding, as we've recently seen with T'Pol and Sato and during the Romulan remote control episode, the Vulcans have recently begun (Enterprise era) to admit that they ALL have telepathic abilities.

They've been supressing them and denying them, but they ARE there.

As can be seen in the TOS episode where a ship with an entirely Vulcan crew is destroyed, the effect of their deaths hit Spock a good distance away. Something like that can hardly be called "rare".

Saavik was not Vulcan. She was apparently half Vulcan and half Romulan (who it seems have somehow LOST those abilities), and was always struggling to achieve a Vulcan-like persona after having had a very bad start in life.

I've always felt the differences we see in her between ST2 and ST3 (aside from her FACE changing :p ) were due to her mentor and guide being DEAD, and her now feeling the need to supress her emotions and strive to be "the perfect Vulcan" all the more.

Valeris? I see nothing to suggest she didn't have the same abilities, but as we know from the novels (quasi-canon), she was a child when her parents died, and she was raised by a non-Vulcan caretaker. She no doubt had never been "properly trained" (as T'Pol described herself), and thus was unable to resist Spock's meld in ST6.

We do notice that both Vulcans shown in VOYAGER simply took their telepathic abilities in stride, as normal.

I suspect those abilities are NOT rare or present in only part of the population. Even in Enterprise, the statement has been made that "Vulcans are telepathic" and when another Vulcan who was a "secret melder" offered to join with T'Pol in a meld, she didn't say anything to suggest such a thing had never, ever been heard of before.

It seems it was known to be a possibility, but looked down on and supressed as part of a mishandling of Surak's teachings.

No. Vulcans are a telepathic race. No doubt abilities vary due to personal makeup AND due to training (just as humans vary in natural abilities and how we use what we are born with and also can improve some things due to training).

This is still fully supported, even with Enterprise being canon.

I just think Manny and what he's done this year has set things back on course, due to B&B leaving it all a little murky and even giving some misimpressions that could be easilly used to think standing continuity has been violated.

Again, Manny rescued us from that, and things are back on course now.

We just need three more years of such corrections, is all, to make sure all is well. ;)
 
Re: After watching STIII:TSFS, Ent Vulcans make se

A lot has happened to ENT-era Vulcan since this thread. ;)
 
For me, T'Pol and the rest of the ENT era Vulcans made perfect sense. See, I was untainted by baseless fannon fantasy that Vulcans were a monolithic society of emotionless automatons. God forbid that every human should behave exactly the same, especially if it were like Bill O'Reilly. :p
 
^ if it weren't for the fact that all Trek has the overwhelming tendency to portray 'aliens' as monolthic cultures, your POV would be more credible. If Bill O'Reilly was the model for an alien race on Trek, you'd be sure to get a planet full of them. :p :p
 
Jesus CHRIST is everything you hate caused by "TPTB"?!?!

Tim Russ decided to emulate Nimoy but be more stern and drab at it.
 
Posted by T'Parm:
Boy this was an old thread. Um why did you dig it up?

I feel like an idiot replying to this thread.

Is he a troll? They do that sometimes. Bring up old threads just to create confusion and see who won't notice it's old.

*sigh*

Like we needed stuff like this right now... :(
 
To some of us newbies on this board, this is a new thread.

Something to think about regarding Enterprise's Vulcans. They have apparently strayed from Sarek's teaching and some of them aren't Vulcan, they're Romulan spies and trouble makers. In general I've been ok with Enterprise's Vulcans because they don't seem all that different from Spock and Sarek. Tuvok was the one that seemed wrong to me. Instead of having emotions that he controlled, it felt like he just didn't have any emotions. But then thinking back, most of the Vulcan characters I've liked have spent a lot of time with humans and that has to have changed them somewhat.
 
Something to think about regarding Enterprise's Vulcans. They have apparently strayed from Sarek's teaching and some of them aren't Vulcan, they're Romulan spies and trouble makers. In general I've been ok with Enterprise's Vulcans because they don't seem all that different from Spock and Sarek. Tuvok was the one that seemed wrong to me. Instead of having emotions that he controlled, it felt like he just didn't have any emotions. But then thinking back, most of the Vulcan characters I've liked have spent a lot of time with humans and that has to have changed them somewhat.

i think the Kir'shara was the turning point because up untill it was discovered, Vulcans had to interprit Surak's teachings and as we all know everyone has their own opinions on topics only their opinions controled there society.
 
It doesn't matter if you think you found evidence in other Treks which has Vulcans acting like they did in Enterprise. Enterprise Vulcans were different than Vulcans in other Treks. This is canon. The Vulcan arc earlier this year (you know "The Forge", "Awakening" and "Kir'shara") have proven so. In fact, "Kir'shara" even showed that Enterprise Vulcans were under Romulan influence. Case closed.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top