a gigantic "no shit" is in order here.
Well, that explains the lack of a bridge toilet
a gigantic "no shit" is in order here.
It needed to be said because a lot of Trek fans pretend it's not so.Both shows require interstellar travel as a given, and thus require some suspension of disbelief, so I believe a gigantic "no shit" is in order here.
If the conceit was to blow up consoles and hull platings every week on limited imaginative shows like STD, DS9 War seasons, and Voyager, but not Star Trek. The show from the 1960's was about other things other than abandoning ship because the crew was in constant peril to be annihilated. This is what Trek has become, folks. It's not about adventure through exotic worlds and meeting interesting aliens, it's about internal/external fighting, and heavy handed politics.Back to Trek...why doesn't the bridge have transporter pads at each station that can be activated in an emergency? Are they afraid a crew member will chicken out ("I'm so done with this. Bye!") and beam themselves away in the middle of an attack?
Bailey totally would have.Back to Trek...why doesn't the bridge have transporter pads at each station that can be activated in an emergency? Are they afraid a crew member will chicken out ("I'm so done with this. Bye!") and beam themselves away in the middle of an attack?
First, I agree that Star Trek was never a hard-SF show and that “science” always to a backseat to fiction.Both shows require interstellar travel as a given
By Season Three, the intrepid Robinsons are flitting from galaxy to galaxy as if they were on some kind of a …uh… star trek, complete with militaristic uniforms adorned with rank stripes, and assisted by a heretofore unseen space pod.
In the latest John Byrne photo comic "Isolation," he depicts a access hatch and service crawl way on the left side of the primary turbolift. It is accessible in the wall that includes the red Enterprise schematic.![]()
I never claimed LIS was consistent. I said both shows use "magic" science.First, I agree that Star Trek was never a hard-SF show and that “science” always to a backseat to fiction.
That said, and with due respect to you and Maurice, the FTL drive situation is a good example of the primary difference between the franchises. Trek was internally consistent and LiS was not.
The Robinson expedition was supposed to be in suspended animation for at least five years*—suggesting a near light-speed transit to Alpha Centauri—and was driven to hyperlight speeds by Smith’s meddling. Once they crashed , the remainder of the first season took place on the uncharted Priplanus, attempting to survive on a hostile world.
Season Two opened with an emergency liftoff, resort to a fuel barge (!?), and the rest of the season once again marooned. In color now, the stories were alternately whimsical or campy.
By Season Three, the intrepid Robinsons are flitting from galaxy to galaxy as if they were on some kind of a …uh… star trek, complete with militaristic uniforms adorned with rank stripes, and assisted by a heretofore unseen space pod. Narratively, the episodes leaned more toward action/adventure, with survival and flight now taken for granted.
Star Trek, for all its faults, always had warp drive, which acted more or less at the speed of plot, as befitting the ship’s basic mission: space law regulation and contact with alien life. Lost in Space, on the other hand, dramatically changed the ship’s capabilities and the basic premise of the show to fit the needs of this week’s episode with an eye toward the next season’s renewal.
And still the bridge of the Enterprise has only one point of entry and egress. The Jupiter 2 always had two.
View attachment 3972
*The pilot had the trip to Alpha C taking about a hundred years. That was the about the only “science” NASA could approve.
For some odd reason, LIS writers started saying "galaxy" when they meant solar system. And I think it was only in one or two episodes. I only remember it in "Kidnapped in Space," and it was the aliens who said the Jupiter 2 was passing through the Xenian Galaxy. That can be chalked up to a translation error from an alien language.
Fitting the Space Pod inside the Jupiter 2 is pretty easy once you grasp the non-Euclidean geometry that allowed for a third deck (the Power Core in "The Space Creature"). It's all in how you do the math.
Really the only thing that remained consistent in LiS is the look and feel of the tech. It definitely has its own distinctive vibe to it, that warmed over Forbidden Planet mixed with some vaguely NASA-looking elements.
There's a whole category of LIS fan that only cares about the hardware. Some guys are obsessed with the Robot...
My point is the craftspeople seemed to have taken the project much more seriously than the writers or the producers. And that was Irwin Allen all the way: his pilot films always featured well-crafted, expensive sets with verisimilitude only to be used for a schlocky production run. As I said, “curious.”
The pilot and early eps may have had a more serious edge, but i’m not sure there was ever any serious effort made towards logical design / scientific validity on the part of the producers or writers. I buy what GNDN was saying about the production designers taking things a bit more seriously; their hearts may have been in the right place but I’ve read that Irwin Allen invited NASA to tour the production very early on hoping for some kind of “bragging rights” and they quickly distanced themselves from the show because the ship and technology were so implausible.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.