• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

A Semi-Hater Revisits Voyager

A good idea, and while you're updating your sig you can update my name. ;) You know, to help avoid the confusion some people seem to have about the The.

Yikes! Don't tell me I was the one who started that. :o

Getting older is not fun...
 
So Voyager is off to a good start, hopefully my rewatching can give me a more positive impression of the show. :)

TABLE of CONTENTS
Season 1
Caretaker
****
Parallax **1/2
Time and Again**1/2
Phage ****
The Cloud **
Eye of the Needle ****1/2
Ex Post Facto *1/2
Emanations *1/2
Prime Factors ****
State of Flux ****
Heroes and Demons **
Cathexis **
Faces ****
Jetrel ***1/2
Learning Curve *

Season 2
The 37's *1/2
Initiations *1/2
Projections ****
Elogium 1/2
Non Sequitur *1/2
Twisted **
Parturition **1/2
Persistence of Vision ***
Tattoo **1/2
Cold Fire *1/2
Maneuvers ***1/2
Resistance ****
Prototype *1/2
Alliances ***1/2
Threshold *****
Meld ****1/2
Dreadnought **1/2
Deathwish ***
Lifesigns ***
Investigations *
Deadlock **1/2
Innocence *
The Thaw ***1/2
Tuvix *1/2
Resolutions **1/2
Basics, Part 1 ***

You are aware you've got five stars next to Threshold? A joke, or just a typo? :rommie:
 
Re: A Hater Revisits Voyager

Now here's where I really disagree with you. I've heard this suggestion before and I flat out hate it! Why should Seven have to be noble? I don't want the abnormal person to have to die so the normal people can live and I really think that if someone has to make a noble sacrifice it's just too easy for it to be the one person who has no loved ones back home, the person who wasn't desperate to get to Earth anyway. I'm very glad they didn't decide to go down this road.
It stems back to something Data said in Time's Arrow; he found it reassuring to know that he would die some day because that made him feel more normal. Dying is normal, it is going to happen to every one of us, so having Seven die would be the ultimate act of normalcy for her character, it would make her more human in my eyes.

As for having nobody caring about her back home, that doesn't matter too much because it would have a huge impact on the crew, particularly Janeway. The crew are the ones we got to know over the last seven years so seeing them react to Seven's death would have been more powerful than watching some random characters we've not seen before reacting to it.

What Seven sacrificing herself says is that the only way she can be truly human is to sacrifice herself. There's no redemption for her in living.

That's bullshit--and violates the optimistic view that Trek's always been about.
 
Spock died, Yar died, Jadzia died... People die, it's the one thing that all of us have in common. I don't see how it goes against Trek's optimistic take of the future to say that people die, but I do think it would be thoroughly depressing to live in a world where nobody dies.
 
Re: A Hater Revisits Voyager

What Seven sacrificing herself says is that the only way she can be truly human is to sacrifice herself. There's no redemption for her in living.

No, it wouldn't say she can only be human that way - not necessarily. You wouldn't like it and possibly I wouldn't either - I'm not generally a big fan of character death, though I concede that it does have its place in good drama - but it wouldn't necessarily say that. It would show that that's one way to be truly human, but that wouldn't mean it's the only way.

What else it said would depend a lot on how it was written and acted. Lots of thoroughly human characters in fiction and people in real life have sacrificed themselves for others, after all.

That's bullshit--and violates the optimistic view that Trek's always been about.

But you know that people do die in Trek and in other fictional works, too, including characters that we really care about. Having beloved characters die isn't always incompatible with basic optimism. Thorin dies in The Hobbit - does that violate the basic premise of The Hobbit and LOTR that good can triumph over evil?
 
Last edited:
Well that's the last straw, this means war against the Voyager forum! Niners attack!!! :mad:







The Niner army will get here soon enough, and then you'll be sorry!










They sure are taking their time though. :alienblush:
 
Spock died, Yar died, Jadzia died... People die, it's the one thing that all of us have in common. I don't see how it goes against Trek's optimistic take of the future to say that people die, but I do think it would be thoroughly depressing to live in a world where nobody dies.

It's not that someone dies that would bother me--I was widowed at 46 and worked in oncology for years, so yes, I am well aware of the fact that people die.

However, to say that the *only* way Seven can redeem herself after her time as a Borg is to sacrifice herself for the crew is beyond cynical.

IMO, and I doubt you will agree. After all, you gave Tattoo reasonably high marks when I found it demeaning garbage. ;)
 
Re: A Hater Revisits Voyager

What Seven sacrificing herself says is that the only way she can be truly human is to sacrifice herself. There's no redemption for her in living.

No, it wouldn't say she can only be human that way - not necessarily. You wouldn't like it and possibly I wouldn't either - I'm not generally a big fan of character death, though I concede that it does have its place in good drama - but it wouldn't necessarily say that. It would show that that's one way to be truly human, but that wouldn't mean it's the only way.

What else it said would depend a lot on how it was written and acted. Lots of thoroughly human characters in fiction and people in real life have sacrificed themselves for others, after all.

That's bullshit--and violates the optimistic view that Trek's always been about.

But you know that people do die in Trek and in other fictional works, too, including characters that we really care about. Having beloved characters die isn't always incompatible with basic optimism. Thorin dies in The Hobbit - does that violate the basic premise of The Hobbit and LOTR that good can triumph over evil?

As I have said, over and over and over and over and over and over....

I was widowed at 46. I worked as a cancer epidemiologist for years. I am more than aware that people die and what the repercussions are for the people around them. I don't mind character death in stories.

It is the idea--and Braga made it clear that this *was* the idea--that Seven can only find redemption by sacrificing herself.

IMO, that is bullshit.

YMMV and probably does.
 
Well, granted that Braga said this - did GodBen? (The GodBen, I should say?) If so I missed it. In any case, all I meant was that, at least in theory, Seven's death need not necessarily be treated that way.

Yes, I know about your views on character death - that's why I was more than a bit surprised by the vehemence of your post.
 
Re: A Hater Revisits Voyager

It is the idea--and Braga made it clear that this *was* the idea--that Seven can only find redemption by sacrificing herself.

IMO, that is bullshit.

YMMV and probably does.

I don't recall Braga stating it that way but I would need to double-check my Season 7 interviews to be sure. The way I recall it was "Human Error" was to be the start of a tragic arc for Seven that would culminate with her death in the finale but I don't remember "find redemption by sacrificing herself" being mentioned by him.

I could be wrong though so if someone has the transcript and/or time to check that would be great.
 
Can anyone tell me the episodes where it turned out that Native Americans .... weren't really Humans. Also the ones where a group of Dinosaurs manged to walk upright escape,develop warp travel,leave Earth and travel 60,000 light years plus and had a fear of being compared to Humans.

Those were classic Voyager Episodes for me.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top