I always felt that the stories by the other writers went a long way toward making the B5 universe as rich as it was. Granted that they weren't arc-heavy but there's nothing that says every episode needed to advance the arc a certain amount.
Jan
The only drawback I saw to the way jms approached the storytelling was that it practically burned him out. Other than that it seemed to work out quite well to me, because the focus was with one writer: jms himself, keeping a better coherency on the overall story. With the more separated episodes, not all of them may have fit as neatly into the overall story, but then they weren't supposed to be that way. Those episodes provided detailing and background for the characters and setting. An episode like "Survivors" divulges Garibaldi's issues with alcoholism, never intending to resolve the matter. It may not have been one of the better episodes, but I don't feel it damaged the show either. I don't see that as "maintaining the status quo" so much as building the world around the story.
God - or in some cases the Devil - is in the details.
I was recently watching a where Boxleitner said he wishes that JMS had continued the story of Sheridan and a few of the other main actors rather than going with a whole new crew. But I think that's probably cause he really loved the material, and was as disappointed as anyone Sheridan was taking a backseat to cameos. Jerry Doyle is retired from acting too, and a lot of the cast are dead (either irl or ic) - though I'm sure any remaining will happily appear, I can't see anyone commiting to a seires.
"Soul Hunter" is the one Joe said was too "Star Trek" in the first version. He provided both versions in the script books. "Believers" was pretty much filmed shot-for-shot what Gerrold wrote. The B-plot about raiders was added when Richard Compton hadn't filmed enough footage to fill the time.Indeed. As I recall 'Believers' and 'Soul Mates' were sent back to the writers by JMS to be rewritten, essentially because they maintained the status quo and didn't advance the overall story.
I'm not sure what the original draft of 'Believers' was like beyond it being "too Star Trek"
I've got a question...has Joe ever stated why he hasn't explored the novel route since the conclusion of the previous line? I know most fans really enjoyed the three trilogies we got and I always thought that novels were the best way to continue telling the B5 story.
Or is this another fun intellectual property rights issue?
So this thread has morphed into a full blown B5 discussion? Interesting and understandable since we don't have anything to talk about. I've got a question...has Joe ever stated why he hasn't explored the novel route since the conclusion of the previous line? I know most fans really enjoyed the three trilogies we got and I always thought that novels were the best way to continue telling the B5 story.
What about DC, who is owned by the WB, would they even need to negotiate for the rights? And JMS has written comics for them, so they're already familiar with him.A slightly more viable option would be a comic series, given that the industry doesn't seem afraid to dip into relatively obscure IPs for a limited run. As to why that avenue hasn't been pursued? Probably the same as anything else; the publishers first need to contact WB to get the licence and so far nobody has.
On the other hand, if this new series or a movie does somehow get made (and does good business) *then* we'll get more novels, a comic book tie-in and probably a republishing of the old stuff.
What about DC, who is owned by the WB, would they even need to negotiate for the rights?
did they ever do a novelisation of the lost tales?
What about DC, who is owned by the WB, would they even need to negotiate for the rights? And JMS has written comics for them, so they're already familiar with him.
Book of Dark Wisdom #7: "The Darkness Between the Stars".The demonic possession tale was actually adapted for B5 (with a different ending) from a short story that had been published in a small magazine called "The Book of Dark Wisdom" (IIRC).
What about DC, who is owned by the WB, would they even need to negotiate for the rights?
I *think* they are in different business units, so they would still have to 'pay'.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.