or possibly Romanas?They were Susan's. Duh.![]()
or possibly Romanas?They were Susan's. Duh.![]()
I wonder if there is a second wardrobe somewhere of all the clothing left behind by companions?
or possibly Romanas?They were Susan's. Duh.![]()
I wonder if there is a second wardrobe somewhere of all the clothing left behind by companions?
plus if he ever did regenerate into a woman, he will have something to wear.or possibly Romanas?They were Susan's. Duh.![]()
I wonder if there is a second wardrobe somewhere of all the clothing left behind by companions?
That could potentially be a very poignant moment if the Doctor had a scene there.
Imagine the tears as he finds Sarah Jane's Andy Pandy outfit...
or possibly Romanas?They were Susan's. Duh.![]()
I wonder if there is a second wardrobe somewhere of all the clothing left behind by companions?
That could potentially be a very poignant moment if the Doctor had a scene there.
Imagine the tears as he finds Sarah Jane's Andy Pandy outfit...
SorryU.S.S. Bones ... why have you forsaken us?
Give us a new review!
SorryU.S.S. Bones ... why have you forsaken us?
Give us a new review!. It's hard to find the solid block of time necessary. The good news is, I have most of the next three days free, so I should be able to have one up (or maybe even two) by the end of Sunday.
One thing to throw out there until then though: what exactly was the point of Julie Gardner? Could she be the luckiest person in all television?
SorryU.S.S. Bones ... why have you forsaken us?
Give us a new review!. It's hard to find the solid block of time necessary. The good news is, I have most of the next three days free, so I should be able to have one up (or maybe even two) by the end of Sunday.
One thing to throw out there until then though: what exactly was the point of Julie Gardner? Could she be the luckiest person in all television?
She's the producer, she keeps the budgets in check, runs ideas past the brass and tries to get them to run with it, etc...
Sorry. It's hard to find the solid block of time necessary. The good news is, I have most of the next three days free, so I should be able to have one up (or maybe even two) by the end of Sunday.
One thing to throw out there until then though: what exactly was the point of Julie Gardner? Could she be the luckiest person in all television?
She's the producer, she keeps the budgets in check, runs ideas past the brass and tries to get them to run with it, etc...
I sometimes think people imagine TV shows miraculously spring into life without anyone behind the scenes doing anything...
It's articles like that that make me wish I read the magazine... but I don't.I was reading Moffat's article in the latest DWM and he explains quite well the different things that he, Piers Wenger and Beth Willis do.
As the article puts it. "Piers is also the head of drama for BBC Wales, the same role Julie Gardner had until she moved to LA."
I have to admit that in some of the commentaries she is so overly enthusiastic that she does seem to come across as a bit of a "yes man" for Russell.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.