• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

A forgotten Enterprise?

I haven't seen the model itself, but it looks like a fun project. For those of you not familiar with the classic ringship design that first appeared on the wall of the rec-room in "The Motion Picture," perhaps the most spectacular rendering of XCV-330 comes from industrial designer Mark Rademaker:

http://mark-rademaker.blogspot.com/2010/06/update-time.html

I personally think this design feels more realistic, if not necessarily stylistic, as a future spaceship; and if it weren't such a cumbersome shape to produce or manage in the special effects studio, Jefferies' earlier ringship might have been in more serious contention for the final design of 1701.

DF "Knows What It Means to Look Spaced Out" Scott
 
It's an interesting design, but the rings don't appear thick enough to contain any habitable crew space. What are they for? Are they part of the propulsion system?
 
Though I have seen at least one take on the design that used the ring for habitation. Not that I'm keen on the idea.

Just noticed something... that model has a hangar bay slung to the side of the command module. Haven't seen that on a Jefferies Ringship before.
 
Doug Drexler cites Michael Okuda's explanation for the XCV-330 design:

One of the most radical experiments in early Earth starship design was the Enterprise XCV. Unlike the traditional nacelle-and-saucer configuration, the XCV uses an annular propulsion system, based on Vulcan vehicle designs. This ship however, employed cyclotron accelerators to create a high-energy proton flux. The protons circled through the massive outer rings of verterium gallenide segments, generating a symmetrical subspace field. Each of the two coleopter ring structures contained two counter-rotating cyclotrons. The cyclotrons in each ring operated slightly out of phase with each other, generating the propulsive field imbalance that carried the ship through subspace at warp speeds.
Although I continue to have high praise for the respectable compromise Drexler pulled off with the NX-01, I still would have loved for the Enterprise TV series to have been the story of this vessel. No, it wouldn't have had a crew of 88 nor a bridge with duty stations and a swivel command chair and an elevator. But it would have been one exciting show.

DF "These Are the Voyages of the Starship Flying Oil Can" Scott
 
Though I have seen at least one take on the design that used the ring for habitation. Not that I'm keen on the idea.
Mine was that way, but there may be others...

I based my version more on the image shown in the "spaceflight chronology" :



and put primary habitation in the ring, with main systems in the mainly-uninhabited core.



The ring actually consisted of rotating elements. (There was no artificial gravity, by my reckoning, at this point in history.) The ship didn't have "warp drive" but did have "subspace assisted impulse" as its FTL drive system. I even did a Matt Jefferies workpod to go along with it.

 
Last edited:
Doug Drexler cites Michael Okuda's explanation for the XCV-330 design:

One of the most radical experiments in early Earth starship design was the Enterprise XCV. Unlike the traditional nacelle-and-saucer configuration, the XCV uses an annular propulsion system, based on Vulcan vehicle designs. This ship however, employed cyclotron accelerators to create a high-energy proton flux. The protons circled through the massive outer rings of verterium gallenide segments, generating a symmetrical subspace field. Each of the two coleopter ring structures contained two counter-rotating cyclotrons. The cyclotrons in each ring operated slightly out of phase with each other, generating the propulsive field imbalance that carried the ship through subspace at warp speeds.
...I still would have loved for the Enterprise TV series to have been the story of this vessel. No, it wouldn't have had a crew of 88 nor a bridge with duty stations and a swivel command chair and an elevator. But it would have been one exciting show.
Yes, I also think it would have been better.
 
I have to say, Clawhammer, that your XCV-330 project is perhaps the most heart-stoppingly stunning example of virtual craftsmanship I've ever come across. The finished product here is truly something I feel I can touch with my hands. There's an intimacy about this ship, something about the bright gleaming white enamel finish with the subtle imperfections that come from hard work, that make me yearn to learn more about the (few) people who live and work on this vessel. It's like an angelic submarine with a glistening halo. Whenever I show the completed work to folks, there's a tendency to invoke at least one deity.

Would it be asking too many trade secrets if I were to inquire as to how you polish a rendering to make it look photographic? There's so many fascinating details to this ship that I just keep finding.

DF "Where Do I Sign Up to Ride This Thing?" Scott
 
Well, it is always a real pleasure to see your work. It is amazing how much detail you put in.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top