I watched the episode on Amazon and Danny definitely says "I got our bench".
The character of Harold Saxon appeared in 0 minutes of screen time prior to "Utopia," and yet he was integral to Series 3's arc. I don't really understand this complaint.As for the whole Missy thing, we've only seen her in just a few episodes this season right? How can a character only showing up for like 10 minutes of screen time be so integral to the arc? I'm a little worried after finding a new revelation last night.
I was really hoping that we would actually see Clara as a normal girl this season, but I get the sense that she won't be. I even saw some speculation about going back to how Clara got the Doctor's Tardis number and the whole "Woman in the Shop" thing (Which I completely forgot about) and I'm worried that this series has turned into CLARA Who instead of DOCTOR Who. If my fears are warrented, than I will be glad to get a new companion soon.
Most famously, Edwin Abbott Abbott's Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions is all about a fellow named A. Square from a two-dimensional universe who ends up travelling both to "Spaceland" and "Pointland." It's excellent and hilarious.
A more recent example is The Planiverse, by the Canadian mathematician A.K. Dewdney. One of the humorous aspects of Dewdney's story is that the two-dimensional creatures could not have a complete digestive tract (since it would cleave them completely in two). Rather, they were required to excrete wastes from the same orifice by which they consumed food.![]()
The character of Harold Saxon appeared in 0 minutes of screen time prior to "Utopia," and yet he was integral to Series 3's arc. I don't really understand this complaint.As for the whole Missy thing, we've only seen her in just a few episodes this season right? How can a character only showing up for like 10 minutes of screen time be so integral to the arc? I'm a little worried after finding a new revelation last night.
I was really hoping that we would actually see Clara as a normal girl this season, but I get the sense that she won't be. I even saw some speculation about going back to how Clara got the Doctor's Tardis number and the whole "Woman in the Shop" thing (Which I completely forgot about) and I'm worried that this series has turned into CLARA Who instead of DOCTOR Who. If my fears are warrented, than I will be glad to get a new companion soon.
Has the new series ever had a companion that someone didn't think was overtaking the show?
I just wasted an entire afternoon watching the movie.Flatland.Now I'm wondering what it might actually be like to encounter a 2d species. Surely this has been covered in sci-fi before?
Carl Sagan also discusses this in Original Cosmos.
Flatland.Now I'm wondering what it might actually be like to encounter a 2d species. Surely this has been covered in sci-fi before?
Carl Sagan also discusses this in Original Cosmos.
A more recent example is The Planiverse, by the Canadian mathematician A.K. Dewdney. One of the humorous aspects of Dewdney's story is that the two-dimensional creatures could not have a complete digestive tract (since it would cleave them completely in two).
Was just browsing GB. Anyone else notice the shape of the windows behind Missy?
Why? Was Peter Capaldi too busy?An interesting tidbit from the writer's blog is that in the original drafts the Doctor was not originally sidelined in the TARDIS. That came about after he was asked to make it a Doctor-light episode.
Missy and the Nethersphere isn't an arc. Everything we have seen of them so far amounts to no more than a teaser.The character of Harold Saxon appeared in 0 minutes of screen time prior to "Utopia," and yet he was integral to Series 3's arc. I don't really understand this complaint.As for the whole Missy thing, we've only seen her in just a few episodes this season right? How can a character only showing up for like 10 minutes of screen time be so integral to the arc? I'm a little worried after finding a new revelation last night.
Missy and the Nethersphere isn't an arc. Everything we have seen of them so far amounts to no more than a teaser.The character of Harold Saxon appeared in 0 minutes of screen time prior to "Utopia," and yet he was integral to Series 3's arc. I don't really understand this complaint.As for the whole Missy thing, we've only seen her in just a few episodes this season right? How can a character only showing up for like 10 minutes of screen time be so integral to the arc? I'm a little worried after finding a new revelation last night.
From what I understand he was filming Mummy at the same time Jenna was filming Flatline.Why? Was Peter Capaldi too busy?
Saxon's in the background all the way through series 3...in fact he's even mentioned in Series 2 and in the Christmas special between 2 and 3.
Why? Was Peter Capaldi too busy?An interesting tidbit from the writer's blog is that in the original drafts the Doctor was not originally sidelined in the TARDIS. That came about after he was asked to make it a Doctor-light episode.
Missy and the Nethersphere isn't an arc. Everything we have seen of them so far amounts to no more than a teaser.The character of Harold Saxon appeared in 0 minutes of screen time prior to "Utopia," and yet he was integral to Series 3's arc. I don't really understand this complaint.As for the whole Missy thing, we've only seen her in just a few episodes this season right? How can a character only showing up for like 10 minutes of screen time be so integral to the arc? I'm a little worried after finding a new revelation last night.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.