23 and already middle aged....
Kids these days, they grow up too fast.
23 and already middle aged....
Basic things like the Doctor in it and not Jar Jar Binks, and the companions not being boring post-modern deconstructionalist "och aye I'm so sassy" Buffy characters, perhaps maybe acting toward supposedly dangerous, unusual and scary situations as though they actually were those things. A good story that makes sense and doesn't hope to just get by on explosions, CGI and jokes for idiots - it doesn't have to be Kinda or Vengeance on Varos every week but some credibility and interesting ideas done well would be nice. There's nothing wrong with trying to be amusing, so long as it actually works and isn't a series of stupid one-liners. A show not made to impress idiots and that makes an effort not to include glaringly stupid things.Well I'm 23 and thought they were fucking embarrassing.I'm 42 and a half and I also loved them.
Yes."That is one big pile of shit."
This had the same atmosphere as an episode of Scooby Doo; it made Red Dwarf look like serious, po-faced hard sci-fi in comparison. The Doctor's ADHD 7 year old who's had too much Robinsons act was more heightened than ever. Rory's dad make a joke about balls, and Samey Pond had an inevitable trite "Och aye, ahm worth ten men ahm so sassy, hoots mon" line. Chibnall's trying to be like Moffat trying to be like RTD. And to think some people want this contemptible hack as showrunner.
The plot was stupid to the point of retardation. The engine right, waves? How does that work? Has Chinball never heard tidal power's generated by tides which are caused by the gravitational pull of the moon? You don't just put a load of water in a fake beach and it magically generates energy. It can't be caused by the ship's own mass-derived gravity, otherwise we could use tidal energy to start piloting planet Earth around. What was the resolution, they needed two related people to pilot with the two magic chairs so the Indian army would shoot the other thing instead? Handy that Rory's dad accidentally came along. Jesus wept.
The villain was the only redeeming thing, a well-acted and interesting character who belonged in a story that couldn't have been written by a toddler. And of course, the Doctor murdered him. Never cowardly or cruel eh.
Ok. I'm going to ask you. What would be your perfect Dr Who story? Story, script, characters etc. What do you want from Doctor Who?
It didn't recognize a Timelord or Gallifreyan so it doesn't know everything.
I suppose, but why not identify the species if not the individual ID? There's the timelock, of course. With the Doctor 'dead' or 'vanished' and timelords never exixting, so to speak, there is nothing for it to guess at. But wouldn't that kind of uniqueness be valuable in itself?It didn't recognize a Timelord or Gallifreyan so it doesn't know everything.
It's just as likely that Solomon bought or stole the database from someone else, and it's of Dalek origin... afterall, aside from the Time Lord's, they are the most widely travelled race out there... so their database, especially after the Time War, would be stupidly valuable to anyone...
And since The Doctor was erased from the Dalek databases, then Solomon's scanner didn't recognise him...
works for me anyway lol
M
Basic things like the Doctor in it and not Jar Jar Binks, and the companions not being boring post-modern deconstructionalist "och aye I'm so sassy" Buffy characters, perhaps maybe acting toward supposedly dangerous, unusual and scary situations as though they actually were those things. A good story that makes sense and doesn't hope to just get by on explosions, CGI and jokes for idiots - it doesn't have to be Kinda or Vengeance on Varos every week but some credibility and interesting ideas done well would be nice. There's nothing wrong with trying to be amusing, so long as it actually works and isn't a series of stupid one-liners. A show not made to impress idiots and that makes an effort not to include glaringly stupid things.
That's a bit of a leading question now, isn't it.Basic things like the Doctor in it and not Jar Jar Binks, and the companions not being boring post-modern deconstructionalist "och aye I'm so sassy" Buffy characters, perhaps maybe acting toward supposedly dangerous, unusual and scary situations as though they actually were those things. A good story that makes sense and doesn't hope to just get by on explosions, CGI and jokes for idiots - it doesn't have to be Kinda or Vengeance on Varos every week but some credibility and interesting ideas done well would be nice. There's nothing wrong with trying to be amusing, so long as it actually works and isn't a series of stupid one-liners. A show not made to impress idiots and that makes an effort not to include glaringly stupid things.
So you think it should be made for clever people like you and not idiots like me who enjoy it?
Well you would think that, being one of the legions much more keen to talk about me than address what I say about the show.I think this might the least subtle troll you've made so far.
Killed, yes. Murdered, not as many.And why do you keep mentioning Murderer Who? Are you not aware that the Doctor has killed many beings over the full run of the show?
By leaving them somewhere to get killed when he could have saved them? I must have missed every episode ever then, because I don't recall that being the resolution too often.Solomon may have had a human face but he seems to have killed more sentient beings than any average Cyberman or Dalek would during it's life. He is worse than eithe Dalek or Cyberman as they are programmed to be the way they are he presumably has free choice. He went out of his way to be cruel and ruthless and the Doctor stopped him. Same way he stops all the other monsters.
I lost a dollar tonight because I bet that someone would say "Doctor Who?" at some point during the story. It seems like it would be the recurring theme based on the prior two stories, but they didn't revisit it this time.I suspect that's more down to the question which must never be answered "Doctor Who?"
That's a rather perverse definition of "murder" you have there. Murder means his death was unjust and unjustified. Where is the supporting argument?Murdered, not as many
So, we are idiots, yes?A show not made to impress idiots and that makes an effort not to include glaringly stupid things.
Hmm, putting aside that bad guys have got it in the neck from nu who ep 1, the first one that jumps to mind is 'Seeds of Doom', didn't seem to mind Scoreby or the main villain getting chopped.I am quite surprised by this, I didn't have the Legion here down as death penalty supporters.
Did I say that? And is this the royal we? Are you grouping everyone together to try create an Us vs You type of thing? Is there no diversity of opinion in your world?So, we are idiots, yes?A show not made to impress idiots and that makes an effort not to include glaringly stupid things.
Are you being wilfully ignorant of the way villains often die and how it happened in this instance? That the Doctor actively could have saved someone easily but had him die instead.Hmm, putting aside that bad guys have got it in the neck from nu who ep 1, the first one that jumps to mind is 'Seeds of Doom', didn't seem to mind Scoreby or the main villain getting chopped.I am quite surprised by this, I didn't have the Legion here down as death penalty supporters.
Why don't you stop talking about me and what I do and talk about the show?Dude, do all of us, including yourself, a favour, and stop watching. Just stop.
I'm 43 and loved the robots...
I'm 42 and a half and I also loved them.
Almost 42 and loved this episode to bits, absolute fantastic romp from start to finish, and I'm still grinning from ear to ear.
"We do not have tantrums!"
And re the Doctor killing Solomon, well firstly it was more of a Batman/Ra's "I won't kill you, but I don't have to save you." and secondly as has been said, Six was way more vicious. Take the killing of Shockeye as just one example.
Are you talking about me and not the show again? You can't help yourself can you.
What in blazes makes you think I'm grumpy?Are you talking about me and not the show again? You can't help yourself can you.
With you level of grumpiness, I'd have guessed 83.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.