Still nope.I think so. They follow the abrams way and it seems to look so much like pew pew pew Star Wars. Even the phasers are now laser bolts just like in star wars. No more continuous phaser stream. A pity.
Still nope.I think so. They follow the abrams way and it seems to look so much like pew pew pew Star Wars. Even the phasers are now laser bolts just like in star wars. No more continuous phaser stream. A pity.
I'll bet the materials still are improved over the original design. Some things are just an apex design and the only changes are miniscule, improvements in materials.I was looking at the capsules. Yeah the Amish Wagons are meant to be primitive, I’m some Amish communities they don’t even allow bicycles because they are considered machines. So the Amish example does not count.
Neither of your examples are 900 years.
I was looking at the capsules. Yeah the Amish Wagons are meant to be primitive, I’m some Amish communities they don’t even allow bicycles because they are considered machines. So the Amish example does not count.
He'll keep going too. It's his thing.Oh, this is becoming difficult to read now.
I think it's funny that Voyager ships (and background aliens!) showed up in Enterprise (200 years before AND on the other side of the galaxy AND used by different aliens!) and nobody cared, but an indistinct smudge being a reused shuttle is an abomination.
And a saloon is ultimate proof of modern Trek being Star Wars. Or something.![]()
I can't believe anyone would compare the level of details attained by a franchise that has Billion Dollar movies and the budget to go along with it to a streaming show made from home. Wow.Us Ship folks like to get the details correct if possible.
Each Era has it's own set of Ships & Shuttles.
Star Wars manages to pull off pretty good internal consistency about this basic thing.
Why can't Star Trek?
I'm pretty sure people cared. People still care, I saw a reddit post referring to the Dauntless in "Azati Prime" earlier today. People have just moved on and there were less people watching at the time. Other people just have short memories. Every Trek show has had people rip into it. I bet people were complaining about the scale of Tsiolkovsky to Enterprise-D in "The Naked Now" and the reuse of the Grissom model AND the blatant ripoff of an original Star Trek episode. People were probably crapping on Star Trek 5 and it's 78 decks. Enterprise and JJ's films got absolutely eviscerated. Now people have just pointed their hate at the next new thing that's come along.I think it's funny that Voyager ships (and background aliens!) showed up in Enterprise (200 years before AND on the other side of the galaxy AND used by different aliens!) and nobody cared, but an indistinct smudge being a reused shuttle is an abomination.
And a saloon is ultimate proof of modern Trek being Star Wars. Or something.![]()
probably?!People were probably crapping on Star Trek 5 and it's 78 decks.
In any case, one can point out “wrong” details even in works they like...I mean, one of my favorite movies is TWoK and I’ll be the first to say that the whole genesis thing doesn’t make sense.
Yeah it's amazing how instead of making a boring '80s style drama show or '80s style sitcom "in space"; Alex kurtzman wants to return Star Trek to what made it fun, enjoyable, and interesting to watch in the first place. The less preaching we get from a 50-plus year old man the better.I think so. They follow the abrams way and it seems to look so much like pew pew pew Star Wars. Even the phasers are now laser bolts just like in star wars. No more continuous phaser stream. A pity.
The one on the right is too advanced. I can see far too much detail for me to be able to suspend my disbelief and accept it as being a design 1800 years older than the one on the left.
This is my feelings very strongly. I know it often gets accused of "what about-ism" but this is part of Trek and it isn't going to change until making productions are able to do so without the stress of production schedules and deadlines and rendering times.Yeah, you see it a lot with the nit-picky stuff aimed at DSC. Most of it leads me thinking ‘you must hate a lot of Star Trek then...’ because most often it’s just stuff that’s happened before and quite regularly.
Trek was doing "Westerns" before Star Wars was just a gleam in Lucas' eye.And a saloon is ultimate proof of modern Trek being Star Wars. Or something.![]()
And that's perfectly fine. Honestly, I too sometimes like to point out the things that don't make sense even though I'm a fan. It just gets old to point out every "wrong" thing in a show to try to say how it isn't good, when past shows all have their own "wrong" things.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.