I rewatched the first season recently and I think it is markedly different in tone and structure - episodes like "Children of the Comet", "Where Suffering Cannot Reach", and "Ghosts of Ilyria" are solid three-act standalone stories of the type that S3's had a lot of trouble (or is just uninterested in) making.I think this season might be as good as season 2 or 1. But the excitement of the novelty is wearing off - it's more visible what this series "is", warts and all.
Jammer:
- Stepping back and looking at the season as a whole, it does feel like there were quite a few missed opportunities in favor of goofy comedies. This has become a show that eschews serious intentions in favor of being lightweight and likable. It does a lot of things to pay homage to Star Trek, but it doesn't spend enough time being Star Trek. Next season, I'd like to see something with some real substance. I don't feel like we've gotten one of those in a while.
Not an attempt to dissuade you from your view, but I have a completely opposite opinion on Kirk’s presence. I genuinely enjoy Wesley as Kirk and two of my favourite episodes feature him prominently (A Quality of Mercy and Tomorrow…).The biggest problem of this series might be Kirk. He does not work at all as a character, there's no chemistry with anyone, especially not Spock, and he's always coming over like a sitcom character
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.