Spoilers Agents of SHIELD- The Final Season Discussion

Discussion in 'Science Fiction & Fantasy' started by Turtletrekker, May 14, 2020.

  1. JirinPanthosa

    JirinPanthosa Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2012
    Location:
    JirinPanthosa
    I like the simpler explanation that they are in the prime Marvel universe and just got really lucky or weren't affected by the snap, or it just happened while they were gone from the timeline.

    Any attempt to move them into a different timeline needs to be able to explain why the Confederacy and Izel didn't come to Earth in the prime timeline, and why there isn't a gravitonium infused Ruby out there somewhere.
     
  2. Jayson1

    Jayson1 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2017
    My big issue is when they come back the Zephyr likely wouldn't be in the same spot and even if it was it would likely be out of gas. I also think Fitz would have died unless Enoch also was taken in the snap because nobody would be around to maintain his frozen chamber device.

    Jason
     
  3. JD

    JD Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2004
    Location:
    Arizona, USA
    If the snap happened while they were in the air on the Zephyr it either would have crashed and been destroyed right then and there, or it would have eventually run out of cash and crashed and been destroyed. Either way, it wouldn't be there when they were unsnapped.
    I was expecting to them to kill off at least one character since it was the series finale, and was presently surprised when everybody made out the side. We did lose Deke to the other timeline, but he is still alive.
     
    Last edited: Aug 17, 2020
  4. EdSanders63

    EdSanders63 Ensign Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2019
    I assumed that the mental command Banner gave the stones to bring everyone back safely kept that sort of thing from happening?
     
  5. JD

    JD Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2004
    Location:
    Arizona, USA
    Even if the people came back safe, that doesn't mean the plane wasn't probably destroyed.
     
  6. ireactions

    ireactions Lieutenant Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2008
    According to Kevin Feige, Banner would have made sure that anyone being restored in ENDGAME would be positioned somewhere safe, so if the Agents disappeared and reappeared on the Zephyr, it would have been safely on the ground, and Fitz would have reappeared inside his cryogenic pod no matter how far the ship had gone in five years.

    https://www.cinemablend.com/news/2471944/yes-the-hulks-snap-in-avengers-endgame-had-a-smart-bonus

    Still a very reasonable criticism of the theory, of course. The other question I've wondered -- how much memory did individuals have of being Snapped and unSnapped? Because my theory depends on the agents not noticing that they missed five years.
     
  7. Jayson1

    Jayson1 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2017
    That's good because could you imagine the other option. They all return high up in the air with no plane and all fall to their death the instant they return. Terrible way to go.

    Jason
     
  8. JD

    JD Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2004
    Location:
    Arizona, USA
    I've never seen anything that would indicate that he also brought back technology, as far as I've seen he just brought back the living things.
     
  9. ireactions

    ireactions Lieutenant Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2008
    That's why I think that the Zephyr had landed when the Snap erased the agents aboard. If they'd been Snapped in mid-air, then Banner would would have restored them at their destination point in Tahiti.

    Also, if the pilots suddenly went missing, the Zephyr would have detected the loss of all manual input from its pilots, gone into full autopilot and landed itself at the original destination at which point the team would have re-materialized aboard, been confused by why their mid-air plane was suddenly on the ground, dealt with the news -- and then May and Coulson would have gone on their holiday while the rest of the team flew off to find Fitz.

    I think?
     
  10. SolarisOne

    SolarisOne Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    I will never understand why some people are so obsessed with trying to shoehorn the Snap into AoS. It's quite obvious the Snap never happened, and there is zero evidence that Thanos even made it to Earth. The AoS timeline only shares some events with the main MCU timeline, and there are certainly no events in the MCU that require any of AoS to have happened at all.

    [​IMG]
     
    The Nth Doctor likes this.
  11. ireactions

    ireactions Lieutenant Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2008
    There's actually a lot of evidence that Thanos made it to Earth? Well, a little. The Confederacy says Thanos is coming and the battle in New York and Wakanda is reported in the news during the closing episodes of Season 5.
     
  12. JD

    JD Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2004
    Location:
    Arizona, USA
    I didn't think they were that specific? I thought they just said something was going on, for all we know something else could have been going on in this universe. Or even if Thanos did show up, that doesn't necessarily mean things played out the same way in this universe as they did in the universe the movies take place in.
    I just think it works a lot better for the show and the movies if they are in separate universes.
     
    SolarisOne likes this.
  13. Turtletrekker

    Turtletrekker Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2003
    Location:
    Tacoma, Washington
    Avalon and The Nth Doctor like this.
  14. David cgc

    David cgc Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2002
    Location:
    Florida
    That doesn't quite add up, because the team time- (and timeline-) traveled to a point just before they went back in time at the end of season six, so there was never a point where they weren't in the universe and could've slipped around the Snap. There might've been more to it in the line (something like, "We're passing back through the shockwave from the Snap in 2018. Lucky thing, too, since we're here, we can't be affected, and since we're immune, our past selves are, too, or else there'd be a paradox, so that's how we all got lucky." But with more technobabble). And even if they were going to say Infinity War happened during the season six finale instead of the season five finale like it seemed, you've got the same "everyone's too happy" problem in the flash-forward ending that keeps people from just accepting the team got lucky off-screen between scenes of the season five finale (which, I admit, is unsatisfying, but it is what it is. I mean, I spent whole episodes of this show waiting for people to start dissolving out of nowhere as an added dramatic complication, but that's what happens when mommy movie division and daddy TV division are fighting again).
     
  15. ireactions

    ireactions Lieutenant Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2008
    It doesn't add up at all, but I can see why Jed Whedon would take the view that the Agents travelling through the quantum realm at the end of Season 6 put them outside the Snap. Despite "The End" directly referencing INFINITY WAR, Season 6 was written with the attitude that all the episodes were happening before the Snap as the creators were not aware of what would or wouldn't happen in ENDGAME.

    It's pretty tragic that by Season 3 of AGENTS OF SHIELD, the writers had been reduced to watching the trailers of Marvel movies to have any idea what was happening.

    Any specific tie-in to ENDGAME would have been during Season 7 as they filmed that after INFINITY WAR had been released to theatres and the AOS team would actually know what happened in the movie.

    I'd just go with my theory.
     
  16. Oso Blanco

    Oso Blanco Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2001
    Location:
    Berlin, Germany
    Parts of seasons 5, 6 and 7 were so bizarre that I halfway expected the reveal that they actually had never left the framework. Which would be the most logical explanation of them all. The first time I was almost convinced that they were stll in the framework was the scene on Tahiti ... which looks so incredibly fake, it just can't be real!
     
    Valin likes this.
  17. Jayson1

    Jayson1 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2017
    Maybe they are all still in the framework and don't even know it. Meanwhile in the real world they are stored somewhere safe were Nick Fury sometimes comes and checks on them. Deke turns out to not even be a real person.

    Jason
     
  18. Oso Blanco

    Oso Blanco Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2001
    Location:
    Berlin, Germany
    That's what I meant. It would really explain it all nicely, and even without crazy time travel or multiverse theories
     
  19. Jayson1

    Jayson1 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2017
    It would fit but I think it would kind of be a bummer to think they are all trapped inside it and that the beloved Deke character wasn't real.


    Jason
     
  20. 1987SpaceGuy

    1987SpaceGuy Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2019
    while some of you prefer to theorize and fit it all into timelines, here some an interesting discussion with the showrunners Maurissa Tancharoen and Jed Whedon.

    Source: https://tv.avclub.com/the-agents-of-s-h-i-e-l-d-showrunners-reveal-the-plan-1844694196

    The A.V. Club: I wanted to talk about something I really admired about the finale, which is how unabashedly nerdy it is.

    Jed Whedon: I don’t know what you mean. [Laughs.]

    AVC: There’s so little handholding. If somebody doesn’t remember what happened at the end of season six, too bad, because you’re not explaining it. You jump around in time like a Christopher Nolan movie. It’s all very puzzle-pieces-sliding-into-place, sci-fi shenanigans—did you already have this big, elaborate reveal planned as you were filming season six’s ending?

    JW: We knew what this season was going to be at that point. We knew that we were going to be jumping through time. And so we planted little stuff that would be easily avoidable if we didn’t end up tying up those loose ends. You know, people in hazmat suits with no faces are easy to excuse as anything else. But we sort of had an idea of what we were gonna do—with no real sense of how we were going to tie that all together. But, you know, confident that we could probably figure it out. So we sort of threw some balls up in the air and hoped that we’d be able to juggle them later. We knew we would have to explain the Fitzsimmons of it and that part of it was its own little bubble. But, yeah, we went in with, I would say, some distant hopes on the horizon. But it did become a brain pretzel-twister by the end.

    Maurissa Tancharoen: At the end of this, everyone’s brains were melted across the board. Our writers, cast, crew.

    JW: It was the first time my first A.D. came up to me and said, “I love you, I love your episodes. I hate this.” [All laugh.]

    AVC: Given how spectacular-looking these last two episodes are, what was the behind-the-scenes strategy for that? Did you have to do a lot of back and forth with ABC in terms of budget?

    MT: We really appreciate you saying that, because as the season progresses, the budget always starts to...

    JW: Part of the game is, how to measure it out. We had the amount of chips that we could use, and we had to save some for the end.

    MT: We’re glad that you weren’t noticing the return to the dark corridors [in previous episodes].

    JW: Oh, he’s noticed. [Laughs.]

    Jeffrey Bell: He’s noticed. The way it works is, you know, there’s a pattern budget, we get the same amount for every episode. And so one of the things that we’ve gone to ABC about—and they’ve been good about—is we say, this week we want to have tuna sandwiches for lunch, so that next week we can have, like, a five-course meal. And the problem is, we started in the 1930s and spent all our money. We just got backlot period costumes, which energized everybody and got everyone really excited. But we have the same amount for every episode. So it’s up to us and our our wonderful line producer, Garry Brown, to really be able to do that. You know, we’re a network show with not a lot of money. And so we’re sad when the corridors are more than we want—you know, we’re as aware of them as you have been from time to time. [All laugh.] And it’s not what we want, it’s just all we can afford to do. We do try and save, so that we can go out with some scope and style.

    JW: That’s one of the things that led to space. Space is a good way to—look at, like, Battlestar [Galactica]. You know, it felt big. And they’re in that same ship, so that little bit became our model once we went to space, because we knew we had the sets we’d had and how to manage them. So the Zephyr jumping through time seemed like it was going to make financial sense... until everyone needs a hat.

    JB: We shoot in Los Angeles, which we’re thrilled to do, but to go off the lot, it’s just a lot. It’s cheaper to go to another planet than to go to Van Nuys.

    AVC: When it ended, did you say to yourselves, “All right, I’m not writing another scene set in a hallway for at least a year”?

    JW: We’re actually working on a new show called Hallways. [All laugh.] I believe that Mack comments on that in the final—

    AVC: I wondered if that was the writers voicing a little personal exhilaration.

    MT: Absolutely.

    JB: Otherwise, the corridors we have in the last two are pretty, pretty sexy corridors.

    JW: Yeah, we have some nice corridors in them.

    JB: Shiny black corridors. We were very excited about those.

    MT: As much as we grew tired of the corridors, we were very sad when they were torn down. Because we had spent so much time in them.

    AVC: They were corridors, but they were your corridors.

    MT: Exactly. They were ours.

    AVC: Fitz’s absence drove the plot this season. When did you first know about Iain’s absence? As you began shaping the season, did you know you’d get him back at a certain point, or did you intentionally decide to keep him out until the end as a sort of safety precaution?

    JW: I think we were confident we’d get him back, because if we didn’t, we’d be so mad at him. But we did build it with that in mind, and also with the concept that when we got him back, that no time would have passed for the character, which was... over the years, we always talked about, in the writers room, how they’re a “forever love.” We feel about them the way that the audience does. And we knew we were going to keep them together. So the only thing you can do is put obstacles in their way. And we had already done that a lot. So this was another time where we were feeling that same problem. And so we tried to build it in a different way, and keep him alive in a different way and make the absence more of a plot point than just a barrier in their relationship. As you see at the end, the payoff is that they already had their happy ending. And so, to quote the president, it is what it is.

    MT: We tortured them for the entire run of the series. So it made sense to us that when we do see them, in the end, they have the happy ending that everybody was hoping they would have.

    JB: To be clear, we shot every moment of Iain that we were given.

    MT: [Laughs.] Yes.

    AVC: Given how playful much of this season was, it often felt like a victory lap and a chance for you guys to cut loose and have some fun with these characters we’ve spent so much time with.

    MT: A jumped-the-shark victory lap, is that it? Is that what you said? [Laughs.]

    JB: We talked about it—that it’s okay to jump the shark.. But as you go over the shark, you high-five the shark.

    MT: And it’s not just one shark. It’s that we lined up a bunch of sharks, and high-fived them.

    AVC: What was the particular mission statement you went into the season with, or what guiding theme did you have as you were starting to put it together?

    JW: We knew we were going to be reliving some S.H.I.E.L.D. history, which we thought was fun. And it was a way to reward our own mythology and the people who followed it all these years. But, yes, the spirit of it was, “Let’s just have fun.” We’ve talked a little bit about how we thought season five was our finale. And we thought of it as, like, you finished the game and then you download a couple bonus levels, you know? So we did feel a bit of freedom. We took some chances on stuff, some big swings.

    MT: Risks, I would say. Yes, we took some risks, but in the end, I feel like we did everything that was meant to be done.

    JW: There was a lot more in the writers room of pitches that, on previous seasons, you would have gone, “That’s funny. So what do we really do?” Instead, we went, “Okay.”

    JB: There was a lot of joy in the pitching. There was a lot of joy in the storytelling. And we wanted a certain nostalgia and joy. It was like, “Let’s look back, and twist and turn.” But we’ve had seasons that had a little bit more angst to them, and though the stakes were high here, the general tenor was more joyous than it had been in past seasons.

    MT: And also with the time travel, it was a way for us to tap into the nostalgia that we were feeling in making this last season together. It’s the nostalgia that was just inherent in everything that we did throughout the process of our last season. With each meeting, we would say, “This is the last props meeting. This is the last time we have to do this production meeting. This is the last time we’re gonna be on the stage.” And then as we were wrapping up our stages like that, it wasn’t even in metaphor. The stages were actually being torn down around us to make room for something else.

    AVC: What was a weird story idea that you had in the back of your head that you wanted to try but never could, whether it was because of circumstances or because you were like, “That’s never going to happen”?

    JW: There was talk about Sousa having to do a detour undercover as a cop to fight in the streets in Avengers because Enver [Gjokaj, who plays Daniel Sousa-Ed.] was in that film [as a police officer], but there was enough timeline problems. [Laughs.]

    JB: We had a lot of ideas where we were—and I’ll say this, I don’t care—we were given the green light originally to use certain characters from Marvel, and started to break story based on those characters—[Coughs.] MODOK—and then they retracted it. So there were a bunch of things that were going to get a little batshit crazy that were above our pay grade, in terms of the toys we were allowed to play with.

    JW: And some of our coolest characters, I’ll say, were adjusted off of those ideas.

    MT: I think some of our best storylines and character development was born out of us having to pivot and scramble. And that’s the fun of our jobs—and the nature of working with an entity like Marvel, where there are a slew of characters to pull from, and there are a bunch of established moving parts. And then when you place your hopes and dreams in something and then it’s not possible...

    JW: We tried never to put all of our eggs in one basket.

    MT: Right. And you scramble. But that’s how our mythology was even formed in the first place.

    JW: Bell always described making TV as, you’re building a plane as it’s falling out of the sky.

    MT: Or you’re plugging holes in a sinking ship.

    JB: Yeah, or you’re laying track on a train that’s—

    JW: All dire situations.

    AVC: Leading to inevitable death.

    JW: Yeah, none of them are any fun. [Laughs.]

    AVC: One of the things that really changed right around the time of seasons three and four was how the show cast off the weight of being so beholden to the MCU in really direct ways. With a few years of hindsight now, what were the biggest frustrations creatively in those early years, and what were the most freeing aspects of these later ones?

    JW: When we started, there’s a million eyes on it, a million cooks in the kitchen, and we had a secret that we couldn’t tell in Hydra. [The first season eventually had S.H.I.E.L.D. infiltrated and taken over by Hydra, as shown in Captain America: The Winter Soldier —Ed.] And I feel like once that reveal happened, we sort of started living in our own mythology. And from that point on, the show took on a different feeling for us. I think that it became something that we were building as opposed to something we were trying to fit in.

    And I remember Bell drawing the Venn diagram of where we were supposed to hit, like, ABC’s expectations and Marvel’s expectations. And we had this little wedge that was what we were supposed to be doing. But I feel like once we come to season two and it just built from there—

    MT: You’re forgetting the general audience expectations, all the Marvel fans.

    JB: One of our challenges was, we were a Marvel TV show and we weren’t allowed to have any of the Marvel characters.

    MT: The only established character from the MCU was Coulson, who’d been in a few of the movies.

    JB: We were starting a Marvel series with five new characters who hadn’t existed in the comic books. So people were like, “Boo, we don’t like these people.” And what Marvel would give us is, “You can’t even have Loki’s staff. You can have, like, this left-handed thing.” You know? So there was an expectation from the audience that we’re gonna see a superhero show with a lot of Marvel brand names. And we weren’t allowed to do that. And we had the big secret, which was we cannot say the “H” word. We could not say “Hydra.” We could not spoil that for Winter Soldier or it would ruin it for everyone.

    MT: Or even allude to the notion of spies or a mole or anything like that.

    JB: So we were a tech series the first season. We were like, here’s this cool tech, here’s this cool thing. But if you go back and you’d look at what—Deathlok was coming along, and all these characters and all these bad guys at the end, all tied into Hydra, we just couldn’t say the Hydra name.

    MT: Yeah. And despite it being more case-of-the-week when we first premiered all of those—

    JW: We were hiding them.

    MT: Yeah, we were hiding that ball. But we also were planting all the pieces, so then, once it opened up, we were able to dive into the Hydra thing.

    JW: But I think that the real difference was the time spent with the characters and people started to feel like they had a connection to them. Sort of being able to tell those stories and lean into it and be confident in that. And that happened at the end of season one, into season two.

    But like you’re saying, by season four, we felt like we had our feet on the ground. And we definitely—four was the one where we tried the stuff that we thought was the hardest to pull off, and most rewarding, in a way. But it really stems from the fact that after the first season, when it was like, “Who are these people?” Now, they’re like, “How could you do that to them?!”

    JB: Once you got Comic-Con people showing up saying, “I’ll be your Fitz if you’ll be my Simmons,” and seeing so many young Asian American women go up to Chloe and Ming at these things and just talk about what it meant... Once those characters took life, it really changed the show for us in a really beautiful way..

    AVC: How did you determine what kind of ending you had in mind for each character? Did you know pretty far ahead of time you wanted that bittersweet scene of all of them talking in the room as holograms, having gone off to live their own lives?

    JW: I think the main goal was the feeling. The first thing we were trying to land on in the [writers] room was, what’s the feeling we want to leave with? We’d already done the end of season five. So what we were trying to capture was, again, the feeling we were having in production, which was, it’s that part of life where it’s a different goodbye. It’s not about loss. It’s about moving on and growing up and that thing that happens where you are very close to people and then you move away, or your job ends after seven years and you go your separate ways. And trying to capture that feeling, that was the goal. And then everything else fell in according to that, was trying to serve that idea. “What’s the end of their arc? What’s bittersweet to know about May? That she’s actually teaching now and that they’re not together?”

    MT: And I do think the one-year jump serves to amplify that bittersweet quality, because we, as the audience, are aware that they’ve been in their new lives, separate from each other, for a year. They’re established, they’re starting to settle into it. But seeing them in that room, and then learning that it’s a virtual room where they actually can’t reach out and touch one another, or give each other a hug... I think in that feeling of longing for one another and that feeling of the loss of what once was—it really lands the bond that they will have forever, even if they won’t be in each other’s lives.

    JB: I think having Enoch say, “This will be your last mission together,” giving the characters that knowledge, gave them the sense that the cast, crew, and writers had.

    JW: And the audience.

    JB: And the audience, which is, “What do you mean, this is the last mission? Why is that, and what does that mean going forward?” And then you see them at the end, you first think, “No, they came together!” But when it becomes the holograms, you see that, “Oh, they’re actually not together.” So there was a vibe we were definitely going for.

    AVC: Presumably, the only other big question you guys had was, “How can we get more Enoch in there?”

    JB: Yeah, that was Joel’s [Joel Stoffer, who plays Enoch —Ed.] doing. He just showed up and kept surprising us with wonderful things. So we just kept writing for him.

    MT: I mean, he was one of our most pleasant surprises ever.

    JW: He was cast at the end of a season because he sounded good saying [Adopts stentorian voice] “Phillip J. Coulson...”

    MT: Yeah, as a voice, basically just a silhouette. He’s very talented.
     
    Jayson1 and Turtletrekker like this.