• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Lucasfilm announces a new direction for the Star Wars EU

<<Plagueis creating Anakin: BACK ON THE TABLE.>>

This was 95% implied to have happened in the Darth Plageuis novel. Either that, or the Force created Anakin as an opposite reaction to their attempt to create life. Either way works for me.
 
It's not a reboot, The movie is ignoring the EU books, just as every Trek movie made has ignored the books.

The difference being because of the new sequels the Star Wars EU is being 'retired' and subsequent novels will take place in the new established universe from the movies.

The Star Trek EU continues on as it's "own thing". If anything the fact that they always existed side by side probably made it easier to keep it since it never mattered.

Up until the first sequel comes out it will have been decades where Star Wars fans who read the EU only had that to fill in the blanks as to what happened after ROTJ. The Star Trek world kept coming up with new things thru TV and movies.
 
Tim Zahn has weighed in.

[...] there's nothing inherently demeaning in the term "Legends." Think back (a little farther…a little farther) to Disney's 1950s "Davy Crockett" TV series, (a show I grew up with) which presented stories and legends about the King of the Wild Frontier. Historians have Crockett's genuine history, but there's nothing that says these TV adventures *didn't* happen, right? So until and unless the legend puts Davy in Tennessee at the same time the real history puts him in Virginia, we can still believe those adventures happened. That's how I expect it to be with the "real" Star Wars history versus the "legendary" adventures of the EU.

[...]
 
Nope, merely a sequel to the existing canon. Exactly as we knew would happen whenever they decided to make a 7th movie. Anyone that really believed the EU was just as "canon" as the movies was just fooling themselves.
 
Neither the Star Wars films nor the Star Trek films are reboots. Battlestar Galactica is a reboot. The new Spiderman films are reboots.
 
Trek is only effectively a reboot, since the existence of an altered timeline within that fictional universe gives the writers a chance to rewrite TOS and subsequent history while leaving the original timeline we're familiar with intact in a parallel reality. From Paramount's point of view the two most recent Trek films constitute a very profitable franchise reboot, but not from any internal storytelling (i.e. nerdcentric) standpoint.

Episode VII isn't a reboot. It's a direct follow-up and continuation of a film series that's been in existence for almost 40 years. The first six episodes in the Saga are still canon.
 
Neither the Star Wars films nor the Star Trek films are reboots. Battlestar Galactica is a reboot. The new Spiderman films are reboots.

I'd say the Trek movies are fundamentally reboots. Yeah Old Spock is running around but really for all practical purposes it's a new animal.

EDIT: Beat to the punch...
 
I like to look at the positives.

Vergere and all her bullshit: GONE.

Admiral Daala: NEVER EXISTED.

Plagueis creating Anakin: BACK ON THE TABLE.

WOOOHOOOOOO!!!!! :beer:

It might be "realistic" but I always thought it was shitty Han and Leia lost two kids.
 
Can anyone else see JJ writing a scene where Han kills someone then turns to Leia, "What? so I shot first".
 
The post-Return of the Jedi continuity is overwritten. Thus, rebooted.
Did I somehow miss a whole slew of SW films that took place after Return of the Jedi?
Oh, only the visuals count?

If you choose to put it in the most simplistic way possible, yes. The thing is that this has ALWAYS been Lucasfilms' policy. EU is canon until it's contradicted by a film (or a TV series, or literally anything Lucas decided to elevate to "official" canon status). People are trying to lay this at Disney's or JJ's door, but if Lucas had not sold the franchise and had decided that he himself was going to make Episode VII, we would still be where we are RIGHT NOW. At least where post-ROTJ EU is concerned. Lucas was never going to let himself be constrained by it, so why should Disney or JJ?
 
I stumbled upon a very interesting and well-researched and cited website regarding the level of canon in the Star Wars expanded universe. They've come to the conclusion based upon quotes from Lucas and other higher ups at Lucasfilm and it's affiliates that novels? Never really has been the real Star Wars universe. I mean, that'll happen when only about a million people read each of these. And that was back during the NJO days. Those numbers surely dwindled as the series continued.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top