II i was too young to fully appreciate it but i remember being scared of Khan (but funny i cant remember what i thought of the brain bugs). also remember thinking the nebula at the end was The Black Hole which id seen recently and that they were going into it LOL. spocks death felt epic like it was really happening. and that he was really dead.
III was amazing it felt so epic and big like it was really there in space witnessing the giant space station and destruction of the Ent. plus it had abit of a star wars feel to it with the cantina, alien microbes, crew becoming rebels, the klingons, phaser fights/ship battles, and the epic fight at the end with all the lava recalled Temple of Doom.
IV was such a feel good movie and was a great timetravel movie (remember it was only the year after BTTF so timetravel was very cool). i thought it was the best out of the 4 at the time (had seen TMP on tv and later as part of a I-IV marathon at the cinema in late summer 87 - what an awesome day that was)
V i was so hyped for it after IV (still a kid) but i remember thinking something wasnt quite right. the FX werent as good as the previous ones, plus it was too jokey (ok IV was basically a comedy but it was funny...not desperate like the gags in this). and the end felt very rushed. even as a kid when you think every movie you see at cinema is awesome i could tell it didnt click (but i still liked it enough to buy the starlog movie magazine and DC comic as i did for each film

VI was just amazing from start to finish. Incredible FX (felt like T2 with the blood and shapeshifter), felt like an epic star trek (as in going from planet to planet unlike some of the other films). feel good like IV, epic battle at the end. remember thinking it was the best one of all 6 (not now though) a true continuation and conclusion to Treks II, III, IV. (and totally made up for V. in fact V being like it was kind of made VI feel even more of a treat!)
GEN obviously felt like a real event going in but quickly started to feel like a TNG two parter on the big screen. very disappointing after VI. Kirks death felt forced like it had to happen cos the writers wanted it to. not organic and neccesary like Spocks.
FC was obviously a step up from VII and felt epic and exciting action packed with a Wrath of Khany type feel (2nd improved film, sequel to an ep, Moby Dick) and also felt like part of the Alien invasion genre that was in full flow in 96 (ID4, XFiles), with the added bonus of a new more Enterprise looking like Enterprise & cool new uniforms (again like II). remember being abit underwhelmed by the ending of Data making out he was on borg side, then switching. i dunno what i was expecting (Ent destruction again?) but it just felt like abit of a cop out to me back then (nothing wrong with it though really)
INS felt boring from start to finish. they showed the Phantom Menace trailer before and it just looked amazing and totally blew anything that followed in Trek IX away (this was obviously before anyone knew what TPM would turn out like - not much better than Trek IX LOL)
NEM was again a big disappointment. (which was surprising as everyone was expecting it to be good from the First Contacty/Ridley Scotty style trailers and that it was an even number) i remember being shocked that an even Trek film was no good (although that said the odd bad/even good rule never held for me as id always considered III to be a good one)
ST09 - it was great seeing a full on big budget Trek film from a new team and was great having the original characters again (and Nimoy of course). of course it was strange seeing other actors playing the roles but then again a younger different actor had portrayed spock in Trek III so it helped think it was abit like that. i remember being underwhelmed by the ending however (similar to FC) from when Kirk and Spock beam on the narada - right up to the end when the Ent escapes the black hole. I thought it was too action orientated, typical of a Michael Bay action film complete with payoff oneliners, shootouts. i felt that when they go over to the Narada and aboard Spock Primes ship they were basically going into the ‘Prime Universe’ and messing about with Next Generation/Prime stuff, - so i was expecting abit more resolution on the prime universe/future (and especially Kirks as his upbringing got so screwed thanks to nero) and have it play more of a role in the conclusion. maybe I was just too old now for loud explosions, shooting and fights and wanted something abit more substantial - I would’ve loved the end when I was a kid but now I wanted something deeper with more meaning, maybe even a twist…(Also it took me a while afterwards to realise there was no Shatner cameo!) But really there was nothing wrong with what they did and a good few trek eps and movies ended the same way with a big fist fight or space battle and saving the day ...(anyway Neros 'I know your face....James T Kirk was a great man' etc was kind of a nod/resolution to Shat Kirk and the Prime timeline).
STID – immediate reaction was blown away by the sheer scale and epicness but couldnt quite believe theyd done Khan and didnt understand why they didnt address how different he was E.g. In the brig khan says Marcus gave him a new face....and/or then had a brief scene of Spock using the ships computer to unearth a photo of Montalban - the same photo of Khan from the briefing room scene in Space Seed (or that he wasn't khan at all just saying he was and at the end we see the real 1967 MontalKhan in a cryopod)
Last edited: