Merriam-Webster said:While the present objection to it is perhaps more heated than rational, someone writing in a formal prose style may well prefer to use as, as if, such as, or an entirely different construction instead.
I like that description.

Merriam-Webster said:While the present objection to it is perhaps more heated than rational, someone writing in a formal prose style may well prefer to use as, as if, such as, or an entirely different construction instead.

"Join us next week for another exciting adventure in deep space on... STAR TREK! And now, a word from our heroes."
Kirk: Mister Spock, how is it you're able to maintain that that steady logic through even the direst of circumstances.
Spock: With an arduous mental discipline... and these.
Kirk: Chesterfields?
McCoy: So that's your secret.
Spock: (Passes out cigs. They light up.) Chesterfields keep my thoughts focused no matter the situation.
McCoy: (Puffing.) They keep my hands steady, too. In fact, I recommend them to all my patients.
Kirk: Well, Bones, this is something I never thought I'd see.
McCoy: What's that, Jim?
Kirk: You two agreeing on something.
McCoy: When it comes to Chesterfields, we can all agree.
(A Klingon enters smoking.)
Klingon: You got that right.
Spock: Chesterfields. They're the logical choice.
"Join us next week for another exciting adventure in deep space on... STAR TREK! And now, a word from our heroes."
Kirk: Miss Uhura, how is it you're able to get a signal to us on the planet through even the direst of circumstances?
Uhura: With great determination-plus Starfleet R&D's newest communication devices
Kirk: Androids?
McCoy: So that's your secret.
Uhura: (Passes out phones. They activate them.) Androids work well each and every time.
McCoy: (Fooling around with his.) They keep me on the go as well. In fact I think that everybody should have them all of the time
Kirk: Well, Bones, this is something I never thought I'd see.
McCoy: What's that, Jim?
Kirk: You liking technology.
McCoy: When it comes to Androids, we can all agree.
(A Klingon enters using one.)
Klingon: You got that right.
Spock: Android phones. They're the logical choice.


I am realizing my enthusiasm for grammar issues on this board far outweighs my enthusiasm for most Trek questions (except the two "fact-checking" threads). I wonder if there is a grammar board out there. Anyone know?

Not in front of mom, though.For the record, there was smoking on both Downton Abbey and Sherlock tonight.
NBC knew younger viewers were watching -- I have press clippings from 1967 in which this is discussed, and suggested as a reason for renewal. Why they weren't doing a better job targeting that demographic...that I can't illuminate for you.
In reality, Star Trek‘s young adult audience wasn’t any larger than the ABC and CBS programs it competed with. According to Television Magazine, the four episodes broadcast between October 27th and November 17th, 1966 averaged 8,630,000 viewers in the 18-to-49 age group, making up 43% of the show’s total audience [51]. By comparison, during the same period ABC’s Bewitched (which aired opposite Star Trek from 9:30-10PM) averaged 10,210,000 young adult viewers or 37% of the total audience.
As for CBS, My Three Sons (aired from 8:30-9PM) averaged 8,580,000 young adult viewers (the series was pre-empted on October 27th) or 36% of the program’s total audience. Thus, while Star Trek had a larger percentage of viewers in the young adult demographic, two of the programs it competed with had more viewers overall (and Bewitched had more young adult viewers as well). This was at the start of the show’s run; ratings fell every season.
Of course, there's a long history of iffy and outright bad grammar in advertising. For instance, Tide detergent had a real howler in their slogan a few years back: "Style is an option. Clean is not."



And I cannot for the life of me figure out what "Imagine Greater" is supposed to mean. Will someone please get Syfy a noun??
Now, that's not exactly what the prescriptivists were about. They were merely trying to capitalize on the rampant class anxiety of people who thought their own English wasn't as good as the rich people's.No surprise. Just one more bit of allegedly "correct" grammar, like the so-called "split infinitive" rule, that's actually just a fantasy made up by prescriptivists so they could pretend their English was better than that of the masses.

And I cannot for the life of me figure out what "Imagine Greater" is supposed to mean. Will someone please get Syfy a noun??
Every time I see that phrase I think, "I can imagine any number of things greater than what you're doing!" It's positively Pavlovian by now.
And I cannot for the life of me figure out what "Imagine Greater" is supposed to mean. Will someone please get Syfy a noun??
Every time I see that phrase I think, "I can imagine any number of things greater than what you're doing!" It's positively Pavlovian by now.
My Pavlovian response is "That doesn't mean anything!"
I had the same problem back in college when "My bad" caught on. That was fingernails on a chalkboard to me. Your bad what? Nouns! Where are the nouns?
This thread is full of win.Every time I see that phrase I think, "I can imagine any number of things greater than what you're doing!" It's positively Pavlovian by now.
My Pavlovian response is "That doesn't mean anything!"
I had the same problem back in college when "My bad" caught on. That was fingernails on a chalkboard to me. Your bad what? Nouns! Where are the nouns?
I confess: I can't get used to "fail" as a noun, as in "epic fail!"
We already have a word for that: "failure."
This thread is full of win.My Pavlovian response is "That doesn't mean anything!"
I had the same problem back in college when "My bad" caught on. That was fingernails on a chalkboard to me. Your bad what? Nouns! Where are the nouns?
I confess: I can't get used to "fail" as a noun, as in "epic fail!"
We already have a word for that: "failure."![]()

And I cannot for the life of me figure out what "Imagine Greater" is supposed to mean. Will someone please get Syfy a noun??
Every time I see that phrase I think, "I can imagine any number of things greater than what you're doing!" It's positively Pavlovian by now.
My Pavlovian response is "That doesn't mean anything!"
I had the same problem back in college when "My bad" caught on. That was fingernails on a chalkboard to me. Your bad what? Nouns! Where are the nouns?

We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.