• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Grade the movie...


  • Total voters
    796
In TWOK, Kirk and Khan never even meet in person, even though Kirk is the hero and Khan is the villain. That left the audience totally confused. Bad film.

In TWOK, Kirk and Khan never even meet in person, even though Kirk is the hero and Khan is the villain. That left the audience totally confused. Bad film.


A missed opportunity...and I'm saying did STID do it RIGHT...making Khan more fierce as well as meeting Kirk in person. Khan even uses Kirk as a means to an end in STID...but then viciously attacks him. It feels like the movie one upped TWOK.

RAMA

The hero not meeting the villain happened in The Fifth Element, so it wasn't out of place in TWOK.
 
In TWOK, Kirk and Khan never even meet in person, even though Kirk is the hero and Khan is the villain. That left the audience totally confused. Bad film.

In TWOK, Kirk and Khan never even meet in person, even though Kirk is the hero and Khan is the villain. That left the audience totally confused. Bad film.


A missed opportunity...and I'm saying did STID do it RIGHT...making Khan more fierce as well as meeting Kirk in person. Khan even uses Kirk as a means to an end in STID...but then viciously attacks him. It feels like the movie one upped TWOK.

RAMA

The hero not meeting the villain happened in The Fifth Element, so it wasn't out of place in TWOK.

TWOK(1982) came before The Fifth Element(1997)...
 
Kirk was prepared to rescue Nero and his crew and he took Spock's rejection of the offer as a chance to execute Nero.

Or a chance to end the most dangerous villain the world had ever seen. You are insisting on viewing this a certain way.

Also: Spock just lost BILLIONS of his kin. If you don't think this is going to affect your decisions, I don't know what to tell you.

And the idea that a theatre of people would give up a rousing cheer over the execution of a foe that's been rendered helpless makes me wonder just what they feel.

They feel it's a MOVIE with a rousing ending for the villain.

Please don't try to conflate that with anything pertaining to reality. I laughed my ass off when I saw Hannibal Lecter show us a guy's exposed brain and eating it, in the second Lecter movie. I wouldn't find it funny in real life. :rolleyes:
 
And the idea that a theatre of people would give up a rousing cheer over the execution of a foe that's been rendered helpless makes me wonder just what they feel.

We don't have to bring ourselves down to the level of those we're fighting.

So, when you saw "Star Trek" (2009), and Nero got his comeuppance, your fellow cinema audience members all sat there, stunned, and murmuring, "Murderers! Murderers!"?

If these same people watched Balance of Terror would they be calling for Kirk to blow away the Romulan Commander? His actions could have started a war that could have lead to the loss of a lot more than just Vulcan.

The point of that ep was that he was more of a noble savage, not a delusional, grief-stricken, vengeful whackjob like Nero.
 
Spock's key line in STXI: "No, not this time."

Spock wasn't gung ho about killing Khan because Khan's crimes were nothing in comparison to what Nero did. Even the killing of Pike, a friend and mentor of Spock, doesn't come close to the six billion Nero killed, including his mother.
 
Anybody else thinking that Khan is still alive so he can come back in 15 years to unleash his wrath on Kirk?

Maybe he'll spend that time in a Spanish prison camp doing hard labor and get a nice tan.

The universe is still trying to correct itself, you know.
 
In TWOK, Kirk and Khan never even meet in person, even though Kirk is the hero and Khan is the villain. That left the audience totally confused. Bad film.

A missed opportunity...and I'm saying did STID do it RIGHT...making Khan more fierce as well as meeting Kirk in person. Khan even uses Kirk as a means to an end in STID...but then viciously attacks him. It feels like the movie one upped TWOK.

I know it's the in-thing at the moment to shit on old Trek but I can't agree that STID ups TWOK by introducing movie cliches and removing the element that made TWOK unique.

The villain and the hero meeting up for traditional fisticuffs is bordering on the cliche these days, as is the villain 'using' the heroes (see The Dark Knight, The Avengers, Skyfall...)

TWOK would not nearly be so highly regarded if they all beamed down to a planet somewhere and had a punch up.
 
I know it's the in-thing at the moment to shit on old Trek but I can't agree that STID ups TWOK by introducing movie cliches and removing the element that made TWOK unique.

TWOK is unique ?

The villain and the hero meeting up for traditional fisticuffs is bordering on the cliche these days

"These days" ?
 
I know it's the in-thing at the moment to shit on old Trek...

Whose shitting on old Trek?

The Wrath of Khan and Star Trek Into Darkness are two films separated by thirty-plus years and different audience expectations. I watched TWOK after the second time I saw STiD and it is still an incredibly entertaining film.

Either Nero was going to be captured or destroyed by Kirk. They weren't going to take a chance on him slipping through another black hole and causing more havoc elsewhere.
 
Khan's crimes were nothing in comparison to what Nero did.

As far as Spock knows, maybe, depending on what Spock Prime related in the Cliffs Notes call. I don't know if it's worth getting into a "who is the worse genocidal terrorist" contest between Nero and nuKhan. Khan just puts a little more intellectual pretention into his mass murder.

Anybody else thinking that Khan is still alive so he can come back in 15 years to unleash his wrath on Kirk?
Great minds do think alike! This universe has set things closer to where I'd like them to be.
 
If you are going to use elements from the prime reality, at least get the elements right. Khan was a Sikh. He governed a region of territory in either Africa or Asia. Instead, we get a Caucasian. This s**t was tolerable in the past; it's less so now. And, now, if the info is correct, we have another date point for the Eugenics War, these wars occurred in the 1950s. (300 years before 2259.)

Remarkably, I'm not giving a damn about this. Despite Khan being one of my faves from the old show and movies, I won't be judging this movie on how closely it follows them.

It's not as if, for example, the character was ever credibly portrayed as a Sikh anyway.

^ That actually makes a bit of sense, since Khan was never particularly religious anyway. So they really couldn't portray him as an authentic Sikh, because Khan doesn't care about anything but power. His name may be Sikh-derived, but that's it. He doesn't observe any Sikh traditions that we're aware of. In fact he seems to go out of his way to avoid them.

He has the long hair (minus the turban, which all male Sikhs must wear as a covenant of their faith) and in the novels written by Greg Cox, he's based in Amritsar and dresses like one. So yeah, he's most likely still ethnically Indian, but it's obvious (to me at least) that he had plastic surgery, since he's still a wanted war criminal.

Anybody else thinking that Khan is still alive so he can come back in 15 years to unleash his wrath on Kirk?

He still is, but he's probably frozen, and about to be placed on a robot ship and sent to a distant planet (along with his 'family') so that he can live in peace away from the rest of humanity, hopefully. Just like at the end of 'Space Seed'.
 
He has the long hair (minus the turban, which all male Sikhs must wear as a covenant of their faith) and in the novels written by Greg Cox, he's based in Amritsar and dresses like one. So yeah, he's most likely still ethnically Indian, but it's obvious (to me at least) that he had plastic surgery, since he's still a wanted war criminal.
The irony here is, if anyone (as you've implied) around here is qualified to ordain someone as Khan, it's Greg Cox. And he's one of Cumby's biggest advocates.

That should be a lesson to everyone else.
 
Ok, in what way is TWOK "unique", then ?

In that the protagonist and antagonist never actually meet up. Yes, there are other movies in which this happens but we're talking relative to other action/adventure movies.

And I don't know how old you are, but this cliché you talked about is far from recent.
Pretty much my point. In fact, it was cliché in 1982, hence TWOK's 'uniqueness' for breaking the mold.
 
In that the protagonist and antagonist never actually meet up. Yes, there are other movies in which this happens but we're talking relative to other action/adventure movies.

You didn't specify that, but I wasn't expecting TWOK to be literally "unique" in any regard.

Pretty much my point. In fact, it was cliché in 1982, hence TWOK's 'uniqueness' for breaking the mold.

Hell, it was cliché in the 40s. So basically, that was my point. "These days" was misleading.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top