^On the show, Earth Starfleet didn't have a lieutenant commander rank. Apparently that changed by the time of the novels.
^On the show, Earth Starfleet didn't have a lieutenant commander rank.
^On the show, Earth Starfleet didn't have a lieutenant commander rank.
Really? Just because one was never shown on the series doesn't mean it didn't exist.
It's a TV show. Nothing exists until someone writes it into an episode.
Besides -- ensigns had one rank pip, lieutenants had two, commanders had three, captains had four. How do you fit a lieutenant commander into that?
The point is, there is no "real" Trek universe where something exists without us knowing about it. It's just a bunch of stuff people make up.
The blurb sounds great.
I have to say Christopher, I'm really looking forward to this. I'm hoping you can do with this what Kirsten Beyer did with Voyager; making Enterprise interesting to me again.
This synopsis sounds great... really looking forward to this one!
RotF:ACoF begins in September 2162, nearly two years after Archer was last referred to as a captain. So there's been time for these characters to go through more than one change in rank.
I was actually a bit put off that Reed somehow managed to get to Captain already, but when you put it like this, I guess I'm good with it. TBH, I had completely forgotten the lieutenant commander reference from To Brave the Storm that The Wormhole mentioned... I thought last we had seen him, he was still a lieutenant. (I was also under the seemingly incorrect impression that United Earth Starfleet didn't have a lieutenant commander rank...)
^On the show, Earth Starfleet didn't have a lieutenant commander rank. Apparently that changed by the time of the novels.
It's a TV show. Nothing exists until someone writes it into an episode.
Yeah, like bathrooms. You going to argue that the ship never had any until we saw one?![]()
Enterprise was on the air four years and in that time we never saw anyone ranked Lt. Commander nor was anyone of that rank mentioned. It's perfectly reasonable to assume such rank does not exist in the United Earth Starfleet.
A question concerning the ranks. Shouldn't Archer be a Commodore? We know from First Flight that rank is used in the 22nd century. Also, as I recall Reed's rank was Lt. Commander in the last Romulan War book, and now he's a Captain? Or is his actual rank still Lt. Commander (or possibly full Commander) but he's called Captain Reed because he now commands a ship?
Keep in mind that the last time we definitely see Archer as a captain in the novels is in November 2160, a few months after the war ends. In the chapter of To Brave the Storm that depicts the Federation's founding ceremony, Archer's rank is not mentioned, nor is anybody else's. (TATV doesn't count since the books have treated it as a historically inaccurate reconstruction.) RotF:ACoF begins in September 2162, nearly two years after Archer was last referred to as a captain. So there's been time for these characters to go through more than one change in rank.
This was intentional. I didn't want to pick up exactly where the previous book left off. I wanted there to be enough of a break between The Romulan War and Rise of the Federation that I could make a fresh start, that this would clearly be the beginning of a new era. So there's been time for a fair amount of change in the characters' lives since the last time you saw them -- not unlike the transition from TOS/TAS to TMP, or from TMP to TWOK. When you pick up this book, you'll find that most of the characters are in new positions -- sometimes just the same job on a different ship, sometimes a more significant change.
Enterprise was on the air four years and in that time we never saw anyone ranked Lt. Commander nor was anyone of that rank mentioned. It's perfectly reasonable to assume such rank does not exist in the United Earth Starfleet.
It's also perfectly reasonable to assume it DOES exist. To wit:
- Earth Starfleet is a navy. It may not be THE navy, but it is *a* navy.
- We never saw anybody promoted straight from Lieutenant to Commander, did we?
And whatever the case with the UE Starfleet, there are lieutenant commanders in the UFP Starfleet as of RotF.
^Kirk was promoted from captain to admiral prior to TMP and again prior to TWOK. But it's generally accepted that he was a rear admiral, which in the US Navy was the equivalent of the commodore rank once that rank was phased out -- i.e. just one step up from captain rather than two.
Personally, I find the whole upper/lower half thing clunky. The Canadian Navy still proudly uses the rank of Commodore.![]()
(Of course, the show writers didn't really stick to this, because they ended up using UES ships in a military role all the time, just like in the 23rd & 24th century shows.)
But mainly in situations where NX-01 was the only ship that could get there fast enough, so it was more a matter of lacking alternatives.
As did the UE Starfleet. Forrest was a commodore in "First Flight."To be fair, I believe Rear Admiral Lower Half is the USN equivalent of commodore, and based on Kirk's stripes in TMP, he would have been equivalent to USN's Rear Admiral Upper Half, still two steps up from captain.^Kirk was promoted from captain to admiral prior to TMP and again prior to TWOK. But it's generally accepted that he was a rear admiral, which in the US Navy was the equivalent of the commodore rank once that rank was phased out -- i.e. just one step up from captain rather than two.
Personally, I find the whole upper/lower half thing clunky. The Canadian Navy still proudly uses the rank of Commodore.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.