Well if nothing else, the prequels have given Disney a really good guage for what NOT to do in a SW movie. Obviously they'll never admit it, but I'm sure thats what's in the back of the mind of everyone who's working on these movies.
Disney normally thrives on kid-friendly characters like Jar Jar,
They'll do whatever they think will make the best movie. It is no longer his universe to control and no longer his story to tell. Thank god.Well if nothing else, the prequels have given Disney a really good guage for what NOT to do in a SW movie. Obviously they'll never admit it, but I'm sure thats what's in the back of the mind of everyone who's working on these movies.
I love all the Star Wars films, prequels and all, so I am actully hoping that Disney doesn't just decide to ignore what Lucas has accomplished. They need to respect what has already been put on film, whether or not those movies met with approval from every aging fanboy. The prequels have a huge contingent of fans and were very successful, so what I don't want to see are Star Wars films trying to alter what was Lucas's story. It's his universe from top to bottom, Disney needs to still respect that.
I wouldn't argue Lucas didn't stink some things up when making the Prequel Trilogy, but at least it was his creation, he still owned it and hadn't yet handed it over to another media giant to do with as they saw fit.
I welcome a Star Wars without Lucas' touch.
Millions of fans would slit their wrists!
I welcome a Star Wars without Lucas' touch.
I welcome a Star Wars with a JJ Touch.![]()
This is really no different than the Marvel Cinematic Universe and we've maintained a relatively high level of quality with the worst films being just decent, which is going to get even bigger as time goes on. They're working out two or three movies every year for the foreseeable future culminating in Avengers 2.
I guess if we look at the "Trilogy" films as Avengers and all of the other standalone films as the Marvel solo movies, one per year doesn't really seem that excessive. And it's unlikely that the creative staff will be doing one movie per year, but different creative teams per film (writers, directors, actors, ect) with a few people overseeing the entire project/universe like the Marvel Cinematic Universe. I don't think one Star Wars film per year is really that bad when looking at it this way.
The adventures of Han Solo or Lando Calrissian. Young Qui-Gon and his Master Count Dooku. Mandalorians. Boba Fett, anti hero.
I welcome a Star Wars without Lucas' touch.
I welcome a Star Wars with a JJ Touch.![]()
YOU GOT THE TOUCH
YOU GOT THE POWAHHHH
The adventures of Han Solo or Lando Calrissian. Young Qui-Gon and his Master Count Dooku. Mandalorians. Boba Fett, anti hero.
I wouldn't mind seeing all of these. The Qui-Gon and Dooku idea sounds really intriguing, since before his alienation from the Jedi Order and fall to the Dark Side Dooku was one of the great swordsmen of the organization and a Jedi of exceptionally high standing.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.