a
Pulitzer Prize-winning historian of the period, claims in a letter to the
New York Times that the movie
“grossly exaggerates” its main points about the choices at stake in the passage of the Thirteenth Amendment (November 26, 2012).
[60] Kate Masur (
Northwestern University) accuses the film of oversimplifying the role of blacks in
abolition and dismisses the effort as “an opportunity squandered” in an
op-ed for the
New York Times (November 12, 2012).
[61] Harold Holzer, co-chair of the Abraham Lincoln Bicentennial Foundation and author of more than 40 books, served as a consultant to the film and praises it but also observes that there is “no shortage of small historical bloopers in the movie”