And I'm sure you can provide a valid cite for that claim?One of the reasons gun owners worry about Obama is his statement to Sarah Brady that he was working on gun control under the radar...
Allow me.And I'm sure you can provide a valid cite for that claim?One of the reasons gun owners worry about Obama is his statement to Sarah Brady that he was working on gun control under the radar...
Obviously Obama provided the grant to buy guns so that he could exploit the incident to push through gun control.And now it turns out that the federal government paid for the guns used in the Aurora shooting via a $26,000 NIH grant to the shooter - which he spent on guns so he could conduct his wacko social experiment.![]()
In other news...Christian Bale visits.
Obviously Obama provided the grant to buy guns so that he could exploit the incident to push through gun control.And now it turns out that the federal government paid for the guns used in the Aurora shooting via a $26,000 NIH grant to the shooter - which he spent on guns so he could conduct his wacko social experiment.![]()
Pretty much inevitable that this would happen I think. Still crazy to see it in writing.
![]()
Bale w/one of the Victims in Aurora, today. He met with a number of them, apparently. This is just the only photo atm.
News story: http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/31301174/detail.html
The idea of suing WB is completely asinine to me. But this guy wants to do it. He blames WB for dramatizing the kinds of things that Holmes did, yet he paid to see the damn movie. Now paying for movie shouldn't put anyone's lives at risk or cause them trauma no matter what they are seeing.. but if you sue Warners you might as well sue any studio that puts out a film where someone uses a gun. It's BS.
Let's add to that the fact WB has been really great during this whole thing, not only holding back on revealing the BO take of the film, but also offering to donate considerably funds for recovery efforts. And I'm sure Bale's visit had to have the blessings of the studio somewhere along the line.
The idea of suing WB is completely asinine to me. But this guy wants to do it. He blames WB for dramatizing the kinds of things that Holmes did, yet he paid to see the damn movie. Now paying for movie shouldn't put anyone's lives at risk or cause them trauma no matter what they are seeing.. but if you sue Warners you might as well sue any studio that puts out a film where someone uses a gun. It's BS.
Let's add to that the fact WB has been really great during this whole thing, not only holding back on revealing the BO take of the film, but also offering to donate considerably funds for recovery efforts. And I'm sure Bale's visit had to have the blessings of the studio somewhere along the line.
I stand corrected on that last point, as Warners said that officially, he came on his own (check last paragraph of the linked article). I just assumed that they had to be involved at some level, if not an immediate one. Still, my overall point holds: WB did nothing wrong in this case save for releasing a movie.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.