I was not a fan of Vader losing his temper and shouting in ANH. It felt to me like Jones was still uncertain about how to do the character while the first movie was being made.
But you have to look at this in context, the character you think about now as Darth Vader didn't exist when they made the first film (regardless of Lucas's revisionist history) - he was the henchman of the week who's first name was Darth (rather than it being a title) and rather being the father of Luke and Leia (because they aren't brother and sister at this point) who has a tragic backstory he's just a heavy.
This is why HD was only meant for stuff that was made with HD in mind...
Huh? The movie was shown in 35mm (and 70mm!) when it was released, both offering resolutions far beyond the capabilities of HD. Granted, it's far easier to pause a Blu-Ray than it is a film print, but still.
It depends. Are you watching the film as an actual "film" - with that sheen that the movie image provides and which is preserved in HD with plasma TVs - or is the image being viewed by way of the 1080 LCD sets that render the image the same as videotape with that "sheen" (which I believe is called interlacing) removed? If the latter, then you're going to see things that were literally invisible when presented on actual film. You can usually tell when you're watching something deinterlaced on 1080 LCD because films like Tim Burton's Alice in Wonderland look like chromakeyed 1970s Doctor Who (which is why I bought a plasma).
Alex
Huh? The movie was shown in 35mm (and 70mm!) when it was released, both offering resolutions far beyond the capabilities of HD. Granted, it's far easier to pause a Blu-Ray than it is a film print, but still.
It depends. Are you watching the film as an actual "film" - with that sheen that the movie image provides and which is preserved in HD with plasma TVs - or is the image being viewed by way of the 1080 LCD sets that render the image the same as videotape with that "sheen" (which I believe is called interlacing) removed? If the latter, then you're going to see things that were literally invisible when presented on actual film. You can usually tell when you're watching something deinterlaced on 1080 LCD because films like Tim Burton's Alice in Wonderland look like chromakeyed 1970s Doctor Who (which is why I bought a plasma).
Alex
I'm not exactly sure what you're talking about, but I have a plasma television. As Jesse Pinkman would say, "Deeper blacks, yo."![]()
Well, he did have a kind of tragic backstory - he was a fallen Jedi and former student of Obi-Wan, now on life support. I guess being Luke's father somehow makes it more tragic, or something.
Plus at the time, Jones would have no idea of the future iconic nature of the character, it was just another job.
Well, he did have a kind of tragic backstory - he was a fallen Jedi and former student of Obi-Wan, now on life support. I guess being Luke's father somehow makes it more tragic, or something.
I don't think it's mentioned outright until the third film, but before that it's represented by the breathing.
This is why HD was only meant for stuff that was made with HD in mind...
Huh? The movie was shown in 35mm (and 70mm!) when it was released, both offering resolutions far beyond the capabilities of HD. Granted, it's far easier to pause a Blu-Ray than it is a film print, but still.
It depends. Are you watching the film as an actual "film" - with that sheen that the movie image provides and which is preserved in HD with plasma TVs - or is the image being viewed by way of the 1080 LCD sets that render the image the same as videotape with that "sheen" (which I believe is called interlacing) removed? If the latter, then you're going to see things that were literally invisible when presented on actual film. You can usually tell when you're watching something deinterlaced on 1080 LCD because films like Tim Burton's Alice in Wonderland look like chromakeyed 1970s Doctor Who (which is why I bought a plasma).
Alex
*Look, I was born in '74 and I knew it as Star Wars, but I've come to accept it as A New Hope because "Star Wars" can encompass so much these days. It's kinda veering into "get off my lawn/give me five bees for a quarter" territory to insist on some sort of naming purity by only referring to it as Star Wars.
milo bloom said:It's kinda veering into "get off my lawn/give me five bees for a quarter" territory to insist on some sort of naming purity by only referring to it as Star Wars.
*Look, I was born in '74 and I knew it as Star Wars, but I've come to accept it as A New Hope because "Star Wars" can encompass so much these days. It's kinda veering into "get off my lawn/give me five bees for a quarter" territory to insist on some sort of naming purity by only referring to it as Star Wars.
I hardly think Darth Vader looks "crappy" in the original film, but clearly the series is long overdue for a full 3D/HD remake complete with smell-o-vision as Lucas originally intended. Just be sure to cast Hayden as Vader and replace Jones' voice with a modulated Hayden Christensen in all the films with Vader for continuity.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.